Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Donna Arnold
Hi! I am trying to refine some XRD data using GSAS and looking for an instrument parameter file for the Rigaku Dmax 2000 x-ray diffractometer. Can anyone help? Thanks Donna

Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Von Dreele, Robert B.
Donna (and anyone else who wonders about this), In gsas\examples there is an iparm file (inst_xry.prm) that can be used for most any Bragg-Brentano powder diffractometer. These instruments all perform more or less equally independent of manufacturer with respect to the things of interest for

Re: Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Maxim V. Lobanov
Your sample will probably broaden the lines (LX, LY, etc.) so much that any attempt to vary the Gaussian coefficients will yield nonsense. Just some remark (of course, I am not a great specialist): At least to my experience, there is always some Gaussian broadening from the sample as well, and

Re: Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Alan Hewat
U, V, and W tend to be highly correlated The correlation between U,V,W is the result of a resolution curve that doesn't have a well defined minimum. If you differentiate the Caglioti equation for the FWHM: FWHM**2=U.tan**2(theta)+V.tan(theta)+W you obtain the condition for the minimum as

Re: Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Peter Zavalij
Theoretically U,V,W should not be refined at all as they describe instrumental broadening, and this is exactly what I do (usually). After diffractometer alignment, a good quality pattern in whole possible angular range has to be collected from Rietveld standard which currently is LaB6. From

Re: Instument parameter file

2004-03-18 Thread Brian Toby
Theoretically U,V,W should not be refined at all as they describe instrumental broadening This is true only when there is no Gaussian strain present. Brian