y a parser that was written by
someone who believed that DNS replies are not case insensitive (which
is true from one point of view, but not from another point of view!).
For people interested in DNS case (in)sensitivity, have a look at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4343
--
Petr Špaček
--
ripe-atl
recent statistics about this.
Stats would be interesting. Another thing to consider is that lots of
one-off measurements might mean "not much data" and at the same time
"inflating database indices a lot" (or not, depending on the schema).
Petr Špaček
Cheers,
Robert
doing study on any given
outage, or even study about optimization practices over time.
For example, the DNS community has service called DNSViz which does just
one-off measurements, and yet, researchers come and write papers based
on data from DNSViz.
HTH.
--
Petr Špaček
--
ripe-atlas
ure, it should be
possible to intersect set of users vs. set of probe owners and see how
many probes would be affected in the worst case - if all of the users
withdrew all of their probes?
If it is not a _significant_ part of network, I would say ... "Nuke it
from orbit."
--
Petr Šp
I'm trying to do that by manually selecting probe IDs when I
need to, but obviously that does not scale.
Thank you for considering this.
--
Petr Špaček @ Internet Systems Consortium
--
ripe-atlas mailing list
ripe-atlas@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas
ally save money or use
> that money for lottery or beer on ripe event(s) . ;)
Hold your horses, self-signed cert with proper TLSA records in
DNSSEC-signed domain is even better, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6698 .
Besides other things correctly configured TLSA record + client side
va
ments.
>
> So I'm curious if anyone else think it would be a useful feature and
> if there is some demand for such a feature - maybe the Atlas team
> could consider implementing it?
Yes, I think it is occasionally useful.
--
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
Thank you, I will have a look. I must have missed DoT in the UI and API
docs.
Anyway, are there plans for supporting DNS-over-HTTPS?
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
On 08. 04. 19 16:47, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:36:37PM +0200,
> Petr Špaček wrote
> a message of
Hello,
could you share plans for DNS-over-TLS and DNS-over-HTTPS measurements?
I had impression that DNS-over-TLS is already supported but now I cannot
find it in the UI so I'm probably wrong.
Thank you for information!
--
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
ttps://dnsflagday.net/
[2]
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/DNS-Compliance-Testing/blob/master/genreport.c#L216
[3] https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/edns-zone-scanner/
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
On 19. 12. 18 11:29, Daniel Suchy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/19/18 10:33 AM, Petr Špaček wr
s not going to happen, go away"
or is there a room for negotiation?
I can provide detailed argumentation if you are willing to negotiate.
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
>
> Daniel
>
> On 12/17/18 6:40 PM, Petr Špaček wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> this is follow-up from R
11 matches
Mail list logo
