Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, David Hall wrote:
Those who value core size over eye-candy would have a nice, clean and
simple WPS interface very similar to today (with arguably less
cruft), while those who want massive eye-candy WPSs would have a way
to implement them without int
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, David Hall wrote:
How is offloading all graphical and extended tag WPS functions to a plugin
in conflict with keeping it simple?
First, it keeps the core simple and that's my primary concern. Then, it is
still (in my opinion) *simpler* than the previously suggested method
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its committ
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Simon M. wrote:
Then I hope very much that it is never considered to move existing wps
functionality to a plugin
I certainly don't think we should do that. This WPS plugin idea I'm talking
about would run instead of the normal WPS, as the normal would be built-in
exactly
You're right about that, but I think that would be a rather small penalty for
running your own wps like this. Also, a TSR can't do anything with the GUI so
it would take some new trick if that's desired.
Then I hope very much that it is never considered to move existing wps
functionality to a pl
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Simon M. wrote:
Why would it be a TSR?
I don't know the internals of rockbox that much, but what happens if I want
to enter the file browser or the main menu? If the WPS is not a TSR it would
be exited and then loaded again -> disc spinup.
You're right about that, but
Why would it be a TSR?
I don't know the internals of rockbox that much, but what happens if I
want to enter the file browser or the main menu?
If the WPS is not a TSR it would be exited and then loaded again -> disc spinup.
But maybe I'm completely wrong here.
If we have the wps in a plugin (which is then a tsr plugin) what
happens if I want to load another plugin? Or another tsr plugin?
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Simon M. wrote:
If we have the wps in a plugin (which is then a tsr plugin) what happens if
I want to load another plugin? Or another tsr plugin?
Why would it be a TSR?
--
Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
On 17/01/07, mat holton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>> I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
> Mostly my boredom.
> Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
> the core size.
>
> As for making a new plugin to d
On 17/01/07, mat holton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>> I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
> Mostly my boredom.
> Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
> the core size.
>
> As for making a new plugin to do the whole wps, I thoug
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
Mostly my boredom.
Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
the core size.
As for making a new plugin to do the whole wps, I thought everyone was
against that idea?
Just out of interest, wha
I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
Mostly my boredom.
Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
the core size.
As for making a new plugin to do the whole wps, I thought everyone was
against that idea?
Well in that case what is it exactly that is wanted, originally the patch just
exited the menu quickly when play was pressed. it was suggested that it
should be the menu (or A-B in the case of irivers)
The patch ended up doing the exact same as the file tree:
play goes to WPS (and starts
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its committ
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin which
would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core, anyway, its
sort of finished and I want t know what people think and weather its
committable?
I think it sound
On 15/01/07, Jonathan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its committable?
17 matches
Mail list logo
