Am Mo, 11.10.2010, 14:37 schrieb Dave Hooper:
I didn't get much chance to investigate (I believe I
have some working changes to remove the macro-hell which gcc should now
have
more luck with, but my arm-elf-objdump seems incompatible with eabi so
unable to easily check the disassembly)
Sigh, right. Can't believe I didn't spot that! Should be fixing tonight all
being well..
On 10/10/2010 03:48 AM, pondlife wrote:
So - pop it on Flyspray, not in SVN..?
Should this addendum to Daniel's proposal be formalized as well?
All new feature commits (the earlier discussed metric of changes
user-seen behavior to the level of needing a manual modification is
dandy) should
On 10/11/2010 12:43 PM, David Hall wrote:
I also believe that the +2 threshold should initially be a tentative
one, subject to later review by the RSB. The ultimate goal, IMHO,
should be an improvement to the overall happiness of the developer
community.
I can envision a cultural divide where
On 10/11/2010 01:47 PM, Paul Louden wrote:
I'd like to propose one additional step - at the time the patch is
posted on flyspray, the person seeking to have it committed sends an
email out to the -dev list. Also, if a patch has been on flyspray for
some time, and has just reached committable
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:22:21PM -0400, David Hall wrote:
All new feature commits (the earlier discussed metric of changes
user-seen behavior to the level of needing a manual modification is
dandy) should be posted to flyspray (where the yays and nays can have it
out) for at least one week
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:43:16PM -0400, David Hall wrote:
I also believe that the +2 threshold should initially be a tentative
one, subject to later review by the RSB.
I'm not convinced that the RSB is the right place for this. While I
strongly believe that the RSB is needed in case of
On 10/11/2010 1:48 PM, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
I'm not convinced that the RSB is the right place for this. While I
strongly believe that the RSB is needed in case of conflicts, I'm loathe
to grant the RSB the power to decide on the actual rules.
Basically, I don't think rules should be made by
Hi,
The Release 3.7, freeze on Monday thread seems to have been hijacked,
so to bring the subject up again, are we freezing now?
I'm also trying to catch up on Rockbox developments over the past few
months, and am wondering if the theme breakage is a reason to bump to 4.0?
I've read the
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Dave Chapman wrote:
Hi,
The Release 3.7, freeze on Monday thread seems to have been hijacked,
so to bring the subject up again, are we freezing now?
I think we should, yes.
I'm also trying to catch up on Rockbox developments over the past few
On 10 October 2010 18:48, pondlife sjba...@gmail.com wrote:
Doing this would almost certainly turn alot of people away because
sometimes a new feature can go from an idea to a commit in an evening
I'd think it better if ideas (and implementations) were shared for a while
(~a week?) before
Would anybody be so kind as to test this patch please:
FS#11666
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/11666
Confirmed continued working on ipod video target build. Not confirmed sim
build (yet, doing that now). Not confirmed that it fixes the PIC problems, as
don't currently have a way of
On 10/11/2010 7:08 PM, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Just trying to gauge opinion.. How do people feel about replacing the
quickscreen action with the hotkey one? (with quickscreen being the
default).
I personally think the quickscreen is totally useless
I still use the quickscreen. I've never used
On 12 October 2010 11:08, Jonathan Gordon jdgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Just trying to gauge opinion.. How do people feel about replacing the
quickscreen action with the hotkey one? (with quickscreen being the
default).
I personally think the quickscreen is totally useless (especially in
its
On 12 October 2010 12:27, Jeff Goode jef...@gmail.com wrote:
The quickscreen isn't a hotkey option yet but it would be easy to add. I
don't have an opinion one way or the other about keymaps for targets I don't
use, so I can't help you there. Too bad that after all this time there
still
15 matches
Mail list logo
