On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Paul Louden wrote:
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
I'm willing to bet that the word
contribute makes people think of their wallets more than coding.
Good point. Maybe we should call it something else? Develop perhaps?
Participate or Get involved perhaps?
Check out
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Robert Menes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably nothing code-related, but I'd like to make sure the manual is
up to spec.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Rob
I'll commit updated screenshots for the revamped while recording
screen tonight, unless someone beats me
On 9/20/07, Dave Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also strongly in favour of keeping a single channel - I'm not that
annoyed by off-topic chat (I can easily ignore it), and very much like
the fact that the Rockbox community is one where there is no strong
distinction between devs and users
On 6/6/07, Manuel Dejonghe wrote:
I could try to link sh to bash instead of dash, but I'm afraid there
is no difference. And then, I can't check it on my own.
Without knowing anything about the scripts in the build farm, I would
suggest you at least try this out. The echo command in dash and
I like that way too. We could have separate chapters for Radio,
Recording etc. The only drawback is the fact that the manual chapter
numbers will then vary between the targets, and as users tend to name
only the section number instead of its name this might cause some
misunderstandings. Not sure
On 5/10/07, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
...or you have a not supported chapter for the units that don't
support a particular feature. In the above example, for a unit
incapable of recording, Chapter 5 would become:
--
Chapter 5
On 5/3/07, RaeNye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little OT here, but what do you think about a flash (or other semi-video
thingy) ~30 seconds promotion clip for RB?
That would be fun, but to be a little more on-topic, wouldn't an
(interactive) animation showing what happens after you have
After the main menu hit the repos and the fact that this is now the
first contact with Rockbox, I don't think I am alone in thinking that
the manual could use some restructuring.
A lot of problems users had in the past, was to understand the nature
of rockbox. E.g. that the filebrowser is the
On 3/22/07, pondlife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried using a thermometer (or IR camera) to work out which chips
are using power? That was the first stage towards solving the H300 power
consumption problem IIRC.
Isn't the problem with PP-chips that a lot of stuff is integrated in
one
Another issue with Flyspray at the moment is that it is not possible
to select an entire group of targets when you create your task. There
could be something wrong with the clickwheel on the Ipods for
instance. In that case you would want to file a bug report to Ipod,
not Ipod nano.
Martin
On
Hello Mark,
I think palatino.sty is contained within the tetex-extra package. Did
you install that as well as tetex-base?
Martin
On 3/23/06, Mark Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uhmmm, tried \\debian and \\debian\user neither worked.
Managed to get latex installed - quite pleased with
I would suggest Ubuntu as good Linux distribution. As it is based on
Debian, the package system is imho incredibly good. Haven't used
Fedora, but I guess that it is a .rpm based distro which as far as I
know is not up to par with .deb. Ubuntu is also very easy to install
and is functional straight
.. here is what can be shown, any suggestions on the
best fields for each one would be good...
frequency, wheather the radio is tuned or not, stereo, preset number,
preset name, radio mode and radio status
and now im going to bed
On 13/02/06, Martin Arver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's
13 matches
Mail list logo
