I see a lot of svn log messages something like:
Commit FS#1234.
or
Commit FS#1234 thanks to somebody.
Could we please try to always specify the title of the FS task, or give
some general indication as to what the thing is?
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dding a single track to a playlist,
then go to play a directory. That ought to trigger it.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
et is
screens.c:(.text+0x72e): undefined reference to `talk_time'
Ah no RTC presumably. OK I fix.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
at going under
Cygwin.
Good luck
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
t it seems like a
big undertaking. This might be a good candidate for a plugin, but of
course that would make it pretty useless for us blind users, until we
make the plugins talk. Should I commit it as is?
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
Very. Thanks for taking the time.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Stéphane Doyon wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Marianne Arnold wrote:
Having said this, I'm willing to test any voice patches on hwcodec, just
can't test always and anytime but I was a tester for quite a few other
features. Sometimes it needs some nagging and point
e;
return 0;
}
... and so on.
I'll eventually need to add functions and I might want to cleanup some
things in there, so I thought I should ask where I should put my dummy
stubs for the HWCODEC sim, and I should probably straighten things up so
they're all in the same place.
Hi,
Most exciting question of the day ;-) : What is the preferred way to
provide stubs for functions not compiled into the sim, as in talk.c?
Adding to uisimulator/common/stubs.c, or dummy macros in same header file
as the real prototype?
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Daniel Dalton wrote:
On 13/10/2007 3:10 AM, Stéphane Doyon wrote:
The patch was tested on e200, X5, and I believe someone tried it on one
of the iRiver models.
That might have been me. But with your whole set of patches it seems to not
break anything. I will try your
ted voice users to be very annoying.
(just realised this last bit is in the wrong thread... but oh well :p
)
I imagine so, but is your comment about anything in particular?
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
p.
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
function I can take out. It's down to long RECORD, or a combination with
POWER (which would be acceptable I guess).
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
ure if
I am getting them. You seem to have more spare time than I do :-). I was
out of town this weekend.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
aken by
higher-level menus, like going to low latency in the sound settings menu.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
features. Sometimes it needs some nagging and pointing to the patch entry in
the tracker though. ;)
Wonderful. I'll call on you at some point then.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
P7653 also is good, although perhaps the setting I added in there is
overkill and should always be on.
Personnally, having the ability to turn this one on or off should not be
suppressed.
OK then. Since you guys both agree, then I'll leave it in.
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Daniel Weck wrote:
On 6 Oct 2007, at 04:21, Stéphane Doyon wrote:
-Increase playback speed without affecting pitch. I'm not starting from
scratch here, I have something more or less working, only the integration
into Rockbox is still somewhat rough.
As part
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Daniel Dalton wrote:
On 28/09/2007 1:03 AM, Stéphane Doyon wrote:
I have a lot more ideas on making Rockbox's voice interface more usable,
Could you tell us some of your ideas?
Well, I have some 15 or 20 patches languishing in the tracker, so as I
said before, I
to handle. It suggests an
interesting question however: among the remaining hwcodec users, is there
anyone at all using voice?
Personally I feel that improvements to this unique feature are very welcome
but I often do not feel qualified to review those patches.
Thank you for your encourag
me on this stuff. I need to know whether some of
this can go forward, or whether I should stop, or what I need to do
differently.
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.videotron.com/sdoyon/
get_audio_buffer() from the core playback module.
Hi,
I'm barging in without having done much research on the subject, but I had
this notion that perhaps the recently added cue sheet support could be a
good starting point for handling playback of DAISY?
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
is playing, but apparently it's caused by some other
commit...! Stil need to work out which :-).
- Original Message -----
From: "Stéphane Doyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:46 PM
Subject: Big SWCODEC recording patch doesn't agree wi
on X5 players, I thought I must have
made some sort of mistake and forgot about it, but now it's still not
working for me.
Any help appreciated, thx
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.infinit.net/sdoyon/
if we need to. Of course, it's
likely to insert small pauses between words, making rockbox sound like
those cheap automated phone services...
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.infinit.net/sdoyon/
never losing my place anymore. I would like to know what others
think about the way it's done though. Also it's incomplete: missing key
mappings and visual feedback.
I also have this one that's not voice / accessibility related:
P#6238 A few more intuitive key mappings for X5
Do thes
th this. As I said, that patch really makes the
voice much more responsive.
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.infinit.net/sdoyon/
o would apply to though?
Well I'm trying out one possible solution. I've put my patch up in P#6188,
if anyone is interested in trying it out. It's an alternative WPS mode in
which skip next/prev cause a 5seconds quick skip forward or backward
within the current track. And you can t
worry about missing voice file entries. One could then proceed to code a
text/html reader application. But perhaps at this point it would be best
to move to a PDA with a general purpose OS, because you're likely to want
all sorts of other services.
So in short, no I don't think a TTS for
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
Stéphane Doyon wrote:
-And there's a few features that would be useful to audio book readers...
for one, it's too easy to skip to the next track when you just wanted to
adjust the volume, and the bus happened to hit a bump at t
general, cheers for maintaining my voice feature!
Well for all the possible improvements I've listed, I really must say
that feature is very useful and very appreciated, and Rockbox seems like a
lot of fun to hack.
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.infinit.net/sdoyon/
the code too much.
P#6171: Talking quick screen.
If I may ask (candidly): how much interest is there for what I'm trying to
do, which is to improve speech support and accessibility?
Thanks
--
Stéphane Doyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://pages.infinit.net/sdoyon/
32 matches
Mail list logo
