[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread s3cr3to
As I commented in private messages. Everything seems to indicate that the amount of characters in the aliases causes my password to fail. And it seems that using too many characters when recording the aliases causes the App to crash. Regards

[Citadel Development] (null)

2021-05-15 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>Ok. Give me a little framework on what you want me to test and how.  The ideal test is this: Start with a fresh 64-bit Linux VM. Don't bother installing the development tools -- you won't need them. Copy over your database /usr/local/citadel/data to the VM. If you're set up for

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
> * In the alias section, I don't think I can place all my aliases, it >seems to be limited to 512 characters, currently I have 779 and >increasing, of course, I need to debug some aliases. If I am reading this correctly, you need more space for an account's aliases than the s

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>I remembered database_cleanup and wanted to try it after copying my >backup to the corresponding directory. Are you running database_cleanup because your db is corrupted? Or are you running it in an attempt to recover unused disk space? Please read this knowledge base entry:

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread s3cr3to
Thank you Art you can set the hidden server configuration key called "c_shrink_db_files" to any value other than 0. This will cause the nightly auto-purger run to shrink the database files on disk after it has completed its work. *Question #1*. How can I configure that option using the AppImag

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread s3cr3to
On 5/15/21 12:03 PM, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: But right now we are looking for problems specific to the AppImage distribution. Can you confirm that the AppImage is running properly, and it isn't showing any problems that aren't problems with Citadel in general? Like these two things? Wit

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>*Question #1*. How can I configure that option using the AppImage? >I'm very curious to see what size the DB will be at when I do a big >purge on some mailboxes that I'm sure are no longer checked. You can telnet to port 504 and log in as an administrator. The command you want i

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-15 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>*Question #2*: Will the reduced DB still be compatible with my current >8.17 version in production? It would be great to have the downsized DB >for future migration. No. Citadel databases are never backward compatible. Once you start up thew new version of the server with the old