Nov 17 2010 3:32am from samjam @uncnsrd in Mail to
room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
Subject: Re: (no subject)
On 16/11/10 22:29, dothebart wrote:
Ok, most of the needed bugfixes were cherry-picked into stable-78x.
this one i'd like to discuss first,
Nov 13 2010 7:58am from dothebart @uncnsrd
7 uid store 14 +FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen).
##
T 85.88.5.81:144 - 80.134.77.32:64212 [AP]
* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen)).
7 OK UID STORE completed.
Â
is it right we reply with FETCH on a uid store request?
Nov 9 2010 9:08pm from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
Subject: Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated.
826932b012c26b5ef97a5bbf45acf10fca6acc60
so far? imaptest and thunderbird.
Until you've also tested Outlook, Pine, whatever Apple is using these
days, and a mobile
Sorry about the delay in getting these logs... Had my workstation decide to melt down (or at least the CPU, literally... thankfully Intel has a 3 year warranty...)
Logs are attached. At the end of foolog_IMAPS.3 and foolog_IMAPS.4 it appears that we might (and I stress might, because I have no
That's great! Absolutely great! I can now use webcit to view
mailboxes with thousands of messages. Also, lately I've notice
everything much faster! I don't know if my vhoster has moved me to
better hardware or if citadel has just got lots better.
I can confirm that it is in fact
Sep 3 2010 10:23am from Art Cancro a...@citadel.org to
room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
Subject: Commit log refs/heads/master
Files: b6938b71c266f458180103090af0ab72e3d9616c citadel/citadel.h
citadel/include/dtds/user-defs.h
citadel/textclient/citadel.c
Excellent feedback - would definitely be willing to provide. I've used Citadel for a long time, figure it's time to start contributing back :)
Sat Sep 18 2010 07:53:45 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate backtrace if client disconnects in client_write
Stu,
Aug 17 2010 11:05pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
Subject: Re: Unusual SSL behavior, likely bug
if you compile citadel with
'-D BIGBAD_IODBG'
as one of your CFLAGS, it will write a transscript of what its doing
on al IO chanels to /tmp/modulename_fd_random
this could
Hi -
Looks like I've got a real zinger of a corner case... Have discovered some unusual behavior in the IMAP server which only exposes itself if SSL or TLS encryption is being used. When using Evolution to move a single or group of message(s) selected via a custom query folder, Citadel ends up
FYI - It looks like the issue with PINE/Alpine are fixed in the most recent
easy install.
- Stu
Jul 21 2010 9:56am from ajc a...@uncensored.citadel.org to
room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 8703
r8703 | ajc | 2010-07-21 12:56:29 -0400 (Wed, 21 Jul 2010) |
Looks like I'm seeing failures on IMAP partial fetch here... Citadel is
returning
a null response after upgrading to 7.80. Also tried the newest 7.81.
To replicate, use Alpine to view messages with Quell-Partial-Fetch set to
off.
This is a regression from the previous branch. If you can
Jul 20 2010 2:16pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
Subject: Re:
Jul 20 2010 2:18pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
Subject: Re:
could you ngrep / tcpdum a non ssl'ed communication with a dummy
password?
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/faq:mastering_your_os:net_sniff
Sure... Will do tonight.
2) could be circumvented by writing on another file than we read, and
then swap the actual files
This tactic would also improve ACID compliance/issues with some newer
filesystems... EXT4 and XFS as examples. With XFS, for instance, if a filesystem
is unmounted uncleanly, files which
Dec 18 2009 8:15pm from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
I guess you can email me the details if there's a security problem. If
it's really something that can't be fixed in a compatible way, then
we'll change the command name. Old clients will fall back to
unencrypted connections.
Jan 10 2010 7:44am from dothebart @uncnsrd
Subject: Subversion
Â
So Jan 10 2010 10:08:07 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff:
Subversion
What tools are people using to access Subversion?
Are you using the command line or some front end tool.
Oct 25 2009 4:19am from davew @uncnsrd
Subject: Spider Monkey
I've been looking at the Spide Monkey documentation.
For simple apps that don't use threads it is self contained.
For multithreading apps like us we need NSPR as well so I guess thats
the
place to
Nov 2 2009 11:40am from davew @uncnsrd
Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7989
Â
Mon Nov 02 2009 11:54:17 AM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7989
My test server now spits out Server strangled due
Oct 17 2009 9:54am from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
Hmm. I wonder if now is the time to take that Big Bloated Step (tm)
we've been contemplating for a few years, and bind a scripting engine
into the system?
Like an open source Lotus Notes!
- Stu
Hi -
Sorry about that - cancel the last message. Accidentally hit Enter and
saved a message that I meant to erase!
Hi -
I would second keeping 0 as the exit code. This is standard knowledge and
would significantly increase needless questions... as well as possibly turn
off those new to Citadel due to the initial stress caused by using the
non-standard values in the first place.
- Stu
Mon Apr 06 2009
Hi -
I just got a box with Suse installed on it configured. I'm going to go ahead
and try to troubleshoot - most likely, there's a bug in the autoconf script
that's not autodetecting the location of the openssl headers.
- Stu
Sat Jan 31 2009 07:49:49 AM EST from BOFHMike Subject: Re:
Hi -
That looks very useful! I will check out the possibilities for integration as
soon as I get some spare time on my hands.
- Stu
Sat Jan 31 2009 06:17:58 AM EST from dothebart Subject: Re:
mod_auth_citadel
Hy Stu, please have a look at:
Jan 24 2009 4:12pm from BOFHMike @mycastlewall (My Castle Wall)
Subject: mod_auth_citadel
I got en error when trying to ./configure --with-apr=/usr/lib
checking Apache APR Version 1 is REQUIRED. Checking for APR... error
configure: error: Bad path to Apache APR 1
Dec 31 2008 8:10pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
Subject: SELinux support for Citadel now available for testing
stu, Google already found you in advance, I've already added you to
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=installation:start#optional.dependencies
and
Sorry about the confusion. I just had a chance to look at the library and it
looks as though I jumped the gun.
The reason for mention was that the struct strbuf is defined as part of the
standard headers on many systems. Since the struct being added in Citadel is
named StrBuf, there shouldn't be
Wouldn't the use of STRBUF break some cross compatibility?
- - -
good job; just a tiny note, since strbuf is ratehr new, some casts into
const
char* are there to get a quick transition, the better way is most
possibly to
give it into functions as deep as you can while
Hi -
I'm assuming, based on my reading of the code and its output, that it parses
the entire database and updates the reference counts system wide. I'm
assuming it is correct to run that after restoring from backups taken on a
running database (i.e. restoring database and logs sequentially).
-
Sorry about the wording below - not enough coffee today - I meant that as a
question so that I can correctly write these scripts!
- Stu
Wed Sep 17 2008 01:31:42 EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Concurrency in FSCK/Refcount adjustments?
Hi -
I'm assuming, based on my reading of the
Hi -
I was testing out some backup/restore scripts that I've been using to
simulate crash/recovery scenarios. I run the backups while the system is live
as my backup window is too long, and wanted to determine what my worst-case
recovery situation would involve. It was just per chance that I
Hi -
I just noticed somthing unusual... I was running the FSCK command to
adjust my refcounts on a test database, and noticed that there may be
bogus refcounts being generated if this command is run at the same time
that a message is received or posted - resulting in duplicates.
Unusual data corruption error
Greetings -
I have been tracking an unusual corruption issue affecting IMAP renames
on folders starting with numberic values (currently when interacting with
PINE/ALPINE as the client). When renaming a folder named 2008 Action
Completed to 2008
Great! I'll try it out against my build. I have access to Thunderbird (in use
here), Evolution (which I use personally), Alpine/Pine (also in use here),
Outlook, Outlook Express, and three PalmOS clients (VersaMail, Chatter - used
by me personally, and Snapper - which has the CBC countermeasure
Hi -
Just wanted to get some feedback to see if a patch for the following issue
would be OK to incorporate... If it is OK, I can code it and submit for
inclusion...
While testing connection from PalmOS using the Certicom SSL libraries, I ran
into a problem. It looks like some versions of the
I do agree that the Citadel side is straightforward. The only area I will
need to research involves Apache mod_svn. Based on my limited knowledge of
the Apache API, it gets iffy at the point of passing the level of access the
user has - i.e. read only or read/write back to the SVN module. If we
I see what you are suggesting. This should definitely be possible by reading
the request location and doing a comparison. I'll need to double check to see
how we can pass the R/W vs. Read Only status back to the AAA state in Apache.
- Stu
Thu Mar 06 2008 05:53:59 PM EST from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi -Interesting you mention that... My system suffered a really odd data corruption problem after upgrading to 7.30.We're a fairly small system (only around ~1 gigabytes worth of mail in the DB at any given time), supporting a small business as well as my own personal email .. The bug exhibited
39 matches
Mail list logo
