Re: [Rosegarden-user] ROSEGARDEN 12.04, codename "Freedom" RELEASED

2012-05-10 Thread david
On 05/09/2012 11:03 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > So for starters, I'd say there's a request on the table to add some kind of > global "always used fixed instruments" override. I'll pass that along. Sounds logical to me. -- David gn...@hawaii.rr.com authenticity, honesty, community http://c

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread david
On 05/10/2012 01:10 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > I guess this problem affects all software development, but I wouldn't know > that, because I'm not a professional by any means. I guess Rosegarden is my > rude awakening to all the jubilation and glee I missed out on by being a > liberal arts m

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread david
On 05/10/2012 05:46 AM, Andy wrote: > > Richard Bown wrote: >> Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could >> contribute to new website/direction/developments. >> >> Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some >> people who are big current c

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Abrolag
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:18:11 +0200 Richard Bown wrote: > Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could > contribute to new website/direction/developments. > > Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some > people who are big current contribu

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Abrolag
On Wed, 9 May 2012 07:20:25 +0200 (CEST) Holger Marzen wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2012, Abrolag wrote: > > > On the promotional side... > > For what it's worth, absolutely every track on my website - and there are > > one or > > two there :) - was developed and performed using Rosegarden. This incl

Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Clem, Brian T.
"On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown wrote: > Devs or Interested in Ports I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to help out if there was more general interest. (Why not particularly interested? I just don

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown wrote: > Devs or Interested in Ports I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to help out if there was more general interest. (Why not particularly interested? I just don'

[Rosegarden-user] Wrong instrument sound on record - possible reason

2012-05-10 Thread Abrolag
I've been working on a new composition and had 10 tracks going nicely. I was able to record to any track and get the correct sound. Now I can't. This went wrong when I started to add/delete entire tracks and change the logical order. I remembered this is *exactly* what happened quite some time ago

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread David Tisdell
I can try and recruit some Mac developers but I am not a developer myself. I know how to compile things but not write code. I could also contribute something in the songwriting area. Another thought is that Debian used to post a list of consultants (probably still does) where people could go for l

[Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden on flatte

2012-05-10 Thread Manuel Bärenz
Hello there, I wanted to support Rosegarden on flattr. There is a rosegarden-on-Flattr, but I wanted to ask you first if Rosegarden is actually registered there and I'm spending my money actually on it. Best regards, Manuel -

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Brett McCoy
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Holger Marzen wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2012, Richard Bown wrote: > >> Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could >> contribute to new website/direction/developments. >> >> Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Holger Marzen
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Richard Bown wrote: > Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could > contribute to new website/direction/developments. > > Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some > people who are big current contributors. This is

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Andy
Richard Bown wrote: > Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could > contribute to new website/direction/developments. > > Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some > people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Richard Bown
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could contribute to new website/direction/developments. Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball rolling so apologies in advanc

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
[cc -devel] On 10 May 2012 13:41, Ian Gardner wrote: > I guess people like me are part of the problem in this regard, turn up one > day, chuck something in to do with linked segments and then f. off into the > sunset. Fly-by-night, here today and gone tomorrow contributors :-( Well, you could

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Ian Gardner
>I guess this problem affects all software development, but I wouldn't know >that, because I'm not a professional by any means.  I guess Rosegarden is my >rude awakening to all the jubilation and glee I missed out on by being a >liberal arts major. > >No great loss.  Software is a pain in the as

Re: [Rosegarden-user] ROSEGARDEN 12.04, codename "Freedom" RELEASED

2012-05-10 Thread David Tisdell
Hi Michael, Thank you for all of your efforts on this project. I know its overwhelming and lonely at times. You have all my gratitude for keeping it going. I am looking forward to delving into this release. It comes at a time when I actually have the time to compile it and not wait for a binary in

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Richard Bown
> But don't forget that overhauling websites (regardless of tools) is a > time sink almost comparable to developing software, especially since > everyone always has an opinion... Agreed. And I wasn't offering but some people have and so that's why I thought I'd put together a proposal for potent

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On 10 May 2012 12:38, Richard Bown wrote: > On one point - who hosts the RG website currently and any chance making this > editable with some non stone-age tools and for multiple users? I host it. It gets updated automatically from the Subversion repo. (https://rosegarden.svn.sourceforge.net/svn

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Richard Bown
> liberal arts major. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu1VhsNOwPU > No great loss. Software is a pain in the ass. It is. And any professional software of this size and complexity would be equally gnarly. It's just the way it is and we all learn to accept this eventually because for some of u

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > ...It's a prettier example of the same sort of breed as that car. After a bit more reflection, it occurs to me the real problem is not the eclectic design, but that every neat little gizmo bolted onto this thing was manufactured by a diff

Re: [Rosegarden-user] ROSEGARDEN 12.04, codename "Freedom" RELEASED

2012-05-10 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > "auto" setting does and how/if it works, and why the default behaviour is > "auto". > > I guess the feature was invented to solve a known sequencing problem ? More or less, the feature was invented to solve the problem of what to do when yo