Very good to know. Thank you!
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:50 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 04:13 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
>
>>> I *might* download and compile it
>
> As of revision 14597, working with your Unnamed.rg file:
>
> When you find
On 04/11/2016 04:13 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
>> I *might* download and compile it
As of revision 14597, working with your Unnamed.rg file:
When you find the whole notes that are too big for their measures, you
can select them and Adjust -> Notes... -> Tie Notes at Barlines
When you find
On 04/11/2016 07:09 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> So this tie notes at bars thing does work, but these 4-beat notes in a
> 2-beat bar are a case it does not handle. Looks like it has been that
> way about 15 years.
I got that one dealt with. If you ever end up in this situation again,
you
> On Apr 10, 2016 23:07, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:46 AM, chuck elliot
>> wrote:
>> > Actually there are devices that do this. I have a Roland GI 10
>> > guitar/midi interface which is basically a real time pitch
On 04/11/2016 05:06 AM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> Thank you very much for the information! And I definitely won't be
> leaving Rosegarden any time soon. I'm really having fun with this.
You caught me at a better time than most new users do. It's not often I
can get work done this close to
On Apr 10, 2016 23:07, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:46 AM, chuck elliot
> wrote:
> > Actually there are devices that do this. I have a Roland GI 10
> > guitar/midi interface which is basically a real time pitch to
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:46 AM, chuck elliot
wrote:
> Actually there are devices that do this. I have a Roland GI 10
> guitar/midi interface which is basically a real time pitch to midi
> converter. It handles pitch bend too and does an impressive job
> without too
On 04/07/2016 07:00 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> I don't mind sending it here.
I'm going to address the "Tie Notes at Barlines" thing not working
directly. By the look of things, this has been broken for a very long
time, and it looks to be a little adventure to sort this out.
The place where
Actually there are devices that do this. I have a Roland GI 10
guitar/midi interface which is basically a real time pitch to midi
converter. It handles pitch bend too and does an impressive job
without too much delay and glitches. Paired with a midi sound module,
you can (in theory) play any
On 04/09/2016 06:22 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> Can it cover bends and vibrato on an electric guitar?
>
> Unless things have changed or I simply missed how to do it, these can
> be put in a score for electric guitar, but MIDI can't do it. Am I
> wrong?
I'm not aware of anything that could
Going to try inline. Last time I tried it (a while back), Gmail didn't
handle it all that well.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:08 PM, D. Michael McIntyre
wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 03:13 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>
>
> >> Perhaps another limitation regarding scoring
I don't think there are MIDI standard events for everything, because I
know you can't use a guitar or guitar-like instrument to input MIDI.
Well, I saw a machine a long time ago, but you couldn't play the
guitar like a guitar, if that makes sense. For instance, no bends.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at
That is a great analogy.
I would also say that music notation is fundamentally visual, not audio
or sequential. Musicians reading a score aren't necessarily going "note
by note" anymore than the typical person reading text reads "letter by
letter". I guess sequencers aren't quite up to the
On 04/08/2016 12:29 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> Not that I think we should abandon the old way by any means, but maybe
> there ought to be a notation 2.0, completely reworked to be an easy
> learning curve for those who already know the old notation, but make
> more sense to coding. I wonder if
That makes a lot of sense.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> As I already said this is really a bit of a conundrum
> I think a good analogy would be imagine writing in a word processor
> (e.g. Writer) or typesetting system (e.g. Latex) VS.
I can definitely believe it, I just didn't see it before you explained
it. It makes sense.
Not that I think we should abandon the old way by any means, but maybe
there ought to be a notation 2.0, completely reworked to be an easy
learning curve for those who already know the old notation, but
On 04/07/2016 07:04 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> If I might ask, because I've been wondering about this, what makes
> doing notation so difficult?
I think the root of it is because notation is a very analog,
infinitely-variable kind of thing that is difficult to represent and
manipulate in an
On 04/07/2016 07:00 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> I don't mind sending it here.
Got it, and took a quick look. I need to take a more detailed look to
figure out what's going on here, and I will have to come back to this
tomorrow. Everything is fixable though. No worries.
--
D. Michael
>>> My understanding of notation is that a whole note is a whole measure.
Only in 4/4 or 2/2 time that is.
I would like to add that a whole REST can mean a whole measure, even if
time is not 4/4, if the rest is placed in the middle of an otherwise empty
bar! I have not tried if RG knows
On 07/04/2016 21:15, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> I should start doing that.
>
> Anyway, as I said before, I had to make the time signature 2/4, which
> would make a whole note of four beats span two measures. I know it's
> weird, but I started composing the piece on guitar and wound up having
>
On 07/04/2016 17:55, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 10:44 AM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>
>> do that and then use shortcuts in LilyPond to "clean it up" visually?
>> To be specific, what I'm asking is if LilyPond has ways of easily
>> fixing problems like my first example.
>
> The
I was thinking so much about the attachment that I forgot to say thank
you. And that "Tie Notes at Bar Lines" was what I was looking for, but
I'm glad to know that it might not work, lol.
If I might ask, because I've been wondering about this, what makes
doing notation so difficult? I know, of
I don't mind sending it here.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, D. Michael McIntyre
wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 07:19 AM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>
>> Anyway, here's one example:
>>
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8p6zThp4KIdN2NyUXBRWHkxUHc/view?usp=sharing
>
>
>
I should start doing that.
Anyway, as I said before, I had to make the time signature 2/4, which
would make a whole note of four beats span two measures. I know it's
weird, but I started composing the piece on guitar and wound up having
trouble finding the right signature before finding that 2/4
I appreciate it. And it sounds like the game is good, lol.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 10:44 AM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
>
>> do that and then use shortcuts in LilyPond to "clean it up" visually?
>> To be specific,
I did it again. Last time, Lorenzo, I promise.
So what I said:
Well, here's the problem: When I initially put the chord in, I made
the notes dotted whole notes, which made them span three measures.
And, now that I'm suddenly remembering what happened there, I
determined that a note BEFORE this
On 04/07/2016 10:44 AM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> do that and then use shortcuts in LilyPond to "clean it up" visually?
> To be specific, what I'm asking is if LilyPond has ways of easily
> fixing problems like my first example.
The LilyPond export engine is very much GIGO. Garbage in, garbage
On 04/07/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> Rosegarden actually does have some 'intelligence' when it comes to
> interpreting notation (e.g. dynamics), but it cannot 'imagine' what you
> would like especially in terms of note onsets and lengths.
It also has totally separate durations and
On 07/04/2016 16:39, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> Oh, geez. It's been a long time since I've used a mailing list and I
> sent my reply to Lorenzo personally. Thanks for your patience,
> Lorenzo.
Happy to help new RG users, it's the least one can do.. ;)
>
> Okay, here's what I said in the reply:
>
>
Yeah, I'm getting a better sense of the whole thing through this
thread. I like that it allows me to input notation as I find it a LOT
easier to think in that than the matrix editor, which, despite getting
the gist of it and being able to make modifications in it, I don't
fully understand yet.
Oh, geez. It's been a long time since I've used a mailing list and I
sent my reply to Lorenzo personally. Thanks for your patience,
Lorenzo.
Okay, here's what I said in the reply:
Oh, it definitely does help. It's not a showstopper by any means. I
asked all of this mainly because a) I'm new to
You could focus on how the piece sounds and when you have it the way you
want, make a duplicate and clean it up from a notation point of view. For
notation, I would just use a fermata where the matrix editor is messing
with the notation.
I love the fact that RG is a musical swiss army knife but
Hi!
On 07/04/2016 00:27, Silas Mortimer wrote:
[...]
> One example is at one point I wanted to make a chord ring out
> longer than I'd originally put it and had already added notes after
> it. I searched for what I should do there, and from what I gather, I
> could only do that in the matrix
On 04/06/2016 06:27 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote:
> Is there some way I can keep the music as it is, but discard and
> regenerate the notation? I apologize for my ignorance here.
It seems to me the most productive way to deal with your questions would
be for me to run through your composition with
Hi. I'm not only new to Rosegarden, I'm new to computer composing
beyond using guitarix/Hydrogen/Ardour for recording. I've been working
on a piece and learning bit by bit as I go along. Of course, this
means that I'm making a lot of mistakes as I go.
The trouble winds up in the notation editor.
35 matches
Mail list logo