RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-31 Thread robert . poiesz
/ -Original Message- From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:11 PM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Hi Bruce, Thanks for describing your procedures. Having

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-31 Thread Bruce T LeGrand
: William.J.Kammerer[wkammerer]@novannet.com.comp Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers We're not really worried about how folks do eligibilities in the short term (pre-HIPAA). But when H-day arrives, an 800 number is no substitute under HIPAA

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-31 Thread Bruce T LeGrand
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mimi.Hart[HartAM]@crstlukes.com.comp Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers I understand your argument Greg...but isn't healthcare different in the following: 1. Walmart uses

Re: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC. Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859 +1 (614) 487-0320 - Original Message - From: Bruce T LeGrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2002 08:52 AM Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Hello Rachel, What

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread Mimi Hart
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Martin, My apologies for mis-using the term non-par (non-participating) when I truly did mean unknown.I think some of the scenarios posted today describe this potential circumstance. And by no means did I have say

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread David Frenkel
. --( Forwarded letter 1 follows ) Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:26:49 -0500 To: BRUCE.LEGRAND, [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mimi.Hart[HartAM]@crstlukes.com.comp Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Requesting clarification on this point.. One

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread Rachel Foerster
electronic mailroom and then make a decision on what to do with it. Rachel -Original Message- From: Bruce T LeGrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread William J. Kammerer
May, 2002 11:42 AM Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Mimi, in the case of the blues, you would send your eligibility request to the Iowa version of the blue plan, whomever that may be. That's part of the national agreement the blues have through their interplan

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread Mimi Hart
PROTECTED] From: Rachel.Foerster[rachelf]@ix.netcom.com.comp Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Martin, My apologies for mis-using the term non-par (non-participating) when I truly did mean unknown.I think

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread Koller, Greg
, 2002 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers I understand your argument Greg...but isn't healthcare different in the following: 1. Walmart uses EDI when it places an order with a supplier

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-30 Thread David Frenkel
] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers You have good points Mimi, maybe the banking industry is the better example. If I go to New York and put my ATM card in the machine, I will get my money because the Citibank machine is ultimately able to talk to my credit union

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-29 Thread Rachel Foerster
with it? Rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Rachel, I was afraid I'd be misunderstood. Let me address

Re: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-29 Thread robert . poiesz
Just a few comments from the peanut gallery. First - I was one of the first people to state that I expect to eventually see and want a clean, secure, Internet way for Health Care to conduct Ebusiness. But that is a long way off. Second - that does not necessarily mean 'open' as I have seen it

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-29 Thread Martin . Morrison
can identify the provider). _ Martin A. Morrison -Original Message- From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers Martin, Not to belabor my

RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers

2002-05-29 Thread Martin . Morrison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers A side note... Can anyone determine why messages in this thread are cross-posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? _ Martin A. Morrison Project Management Consultant HIPAA Implementation/Coordination Blue Shield