i'm currently weoking on getting rpm5 compiled and running under qnx
6.3.2.
in parallal as a crosscheck, i use NetBSD in the same configuration.
i've no problem to get it compiled.
but i did not update the misc/rpm but started a new misc/rpm5 in the
pkgsrc.
i can post this stuff, if you
attached you find the tar containing the needed stuff, without the
patches for qnx.
sounds interesting what scan.coverity.com is doing.
what is opinion/planning in getting rpm5 include in the pkgsrc?
i've talked to the guys from foundry27/qnx and i may check it in there
- a merge back to
i've attached two patches, which let's the makedev() compile on qnx
and netbsd
it's build against 5.1.SNAPSHOT-20080120
patch-aa
Description: Binary data
patch-ab
Description: Binary data
i'd like to get a review, if this has a chance to come into the rpm5
source tree for qnx support
In regard to: Re: Permitting noarch subpkgs from a per-arch build, Jeff...:
After spending 15 minutes writing a script that does
1) Get RPMTAG_CLASSDICT for every package.
2) Get RPMTAG_CLASSIDICT for noarch packages.
3) Exclude noarch types from other types to generate file types that
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Peter Kalbus wrote:
i've attached two patches, which let's the makedev() compile on qnx and
netbsd
it's build against 5.1.SNAPSHOT-20080120
I would move the Makedev() definition to system.h in order to remove
redundancy. Also, similar stuff already is in system.h, so it
i've attached two patches, who perhaps can get arround the langinfo.h problem for QNX systemspatch-ad: added AC_CHECK_HEADERS(langinfo.h), since this may be missing on other systems twopatch-ae: disable the function ofxstrtolocaleif HAVE_LANGINFO_H is not definedperhaps this has a chance to go
