Prolly the same place MySQL.com builds some of theirs.
$ rpm -qpi MySQL-5.0.51a-0.src.rpm
Name: MySQLRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 5.0.51a Vendor: MySQL AB
Release : 0 Build Date: Mon Jan 14 06
In regard to: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 4:53pm on Jun...:
rpm -qi TIVsm-API
Name: TIVsm-APIRelocations: /opt
Version : 5.3.0 Vendor: IBM
Release : 0 Build Date: Wed 08 Dec 2004
01:29
Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 4:53pm
> on Jun...:
>
>> rpm -qi TIVsm-API
>>
>> Name: TIVsm-APIRelocations: /opt
>> Version : 5.3.0 Vendor: IBM
>> Release : 0
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you try sign an RPM built with 3.0.x with a 4.X.Y version of RPM, the
> RPM becomes corrupted.
>
> Would this be something that's easy to fix -- make RPM 5.1.x capable of
> signing both modern and ancient RPMs? It sure w
On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 4:53pm
on Jun...:
rpm -qi TIVsm-API
Name: TIVsm-APIRelocations: /opt
Version : 5.3.0 Vendor: IBM
Release : 0
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jason Corley said (at 12:35pm...:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you try sign an RPM built with 3.0.x with a 4.X.Y version of RPM, the
RPM becomes corrupted.
Would this be something that's
client/api/bin/.buildDate
missing /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/lang/.buildDate
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jason Corley said (at
> 12:35pm...:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Tim Mooney
ang/.buildDate<-- HARG
> ###
> rpm -V TIVsm-API
> missing /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/.buildDate
> missing /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/lang/.buildDate
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at 12:41pm...:
Could a converter be written if preserving header+payload MD5 was
not an issue? You betcha. The details necessary to do so I tried to
send to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> this weekend past, but apparently
e-mail is be
On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at
12:41pm...:
Could a converter be written if preserving header+payload MD5 was
not an issue? You betcha. The details necessary to do so I tried to
send to <[EMAIL PROTEC
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at 2:35pm on...:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at
12:41pm...:
Could a converter be written if preserving header+payload MD5 was
not an issue? You
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
:-) I personally don't care about the loss of vendor signatures.
Since
I'm not very familiar with RPM internals, I'm not sure what all the
implications are for the loss of header+payload MD5, but I'm guessing
most RPM users won't care.
Wel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
>
> In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at
>> 12:41pm...:
>>
>> Could a converter be written if preservi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
>
>
>> :-) I personally don't care about the loss of vendor signatures. Since
>> I'm not very familiar with RPM internals, I'm not sure what all the
>> implications are for
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 10:06pm on...:
Why lusers want to resign package they have not created in first place: if
they want signed package, well, they have to ask the vendor alongside the
pub key - they have already paid anymore.
So they can distribute
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at 3:25pm on...:
Modern == what has been widely deployed for 6+ years.
Jeff, I totally agree. The problem is, for better or worse, there are
plenty of large commercial vendors that are still providing software
that's
On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at
10:06pm on...:
Why lusers want to resign package they have not created in first
place: if
they want signed package, well, they have to ask the vendor
alongside the
pub key
On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at
3:25pm on...:
Modern == what has been widely deployed for 6+ years.
Jeff, I totally agree. The problem is, for better or worse, there are
plenty of large commercial vendors
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 10:06pm
> on...:
>
> Why lusers want to resign package they have not created in first place: if
>> they want signed package, we
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 10:56pm on...:
I can sign the document i wrote. I can sign document, written by other, on
which i have control, can update, verify the quality or, almost, i have
trust. If i have to sign document, which i have paid and not have
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at 4:21pm on...:
Why lusers want to resign package they have not created in first place: if
they want signed package, well, they have to ask the vendor alongside the
pub key - they have already paid anymore.
So they can distribute
On Jun 25, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at
10:56pm on...:
I can sign the document i wrote. I can sign document, written by
other, on
which i have control, can update, verify the quality or, almost, i
have
trust. If i
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at 10:56pm
> on...:
>
> I can sign the document i wrote. I can sign document, written by other, on
>> which i have control, can updat
23 matches
Mail list logo
