Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-31 Thread Karel Volný
Hi, ... - Fedora packages must carry the current release %dist. just out of curiousity, where is this written? grepping https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines for "dist", I cannot find (but my eyes are tired ...) a mention that it _must_ be even included? I'm asking because

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-31 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Antonio Trande [31/12/2015 12:09] : > > >> - Fedora packages must carry the current release %dist. > > > > just out of curiousity, where is this written? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag Note that the NamingGuidelines makes mandatory the use of the %{?dist} tag in your spec

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-31 Thread Karel Volný
Hi, ... - Fedora packages must carry the current release %dist. just out of curiousity, where is this written? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag ah, wrong document examined ... thanks K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH:

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-31 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Note that is not just a fc? vs fc23 issue; just for example: 1) Which RPMFusion packages use %license? (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text) $ repoquery -f /usr/share/licenses/* --disablerepo=fedora,updates -

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-31 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/31/2015 11:58 AM, Karel Volný wrote: > > Hi, > > ... >> - Fedora packages must carry the current release %dist. > > just out of curiousity, where is this written? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag > > grepping

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/29/2015 11:28 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: For example Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11.x86_64 still works on Fedora 23 , but is a FTBFS since F12 or 13 . So fail to build is not equivalent to fail to run . Works but surely does not respect anymore all Packaging guidelines of Fedora. What guideline

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2015-12-29 at 18:51 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/29/2015 11:28 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > For example Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11.x86_64 still works on Fedora > > > > 23 > > > > , but is a FTBFS since F12 or 13 . So fail to build is not > > > > equivalent to fail to run . > > >

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2015-12-28 at 17:46 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/28/2015 01:30 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius > > > > wrote: > >

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-28 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/28/2015 01:30 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius >>> wrote: On 12/27/2015 01:11

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-28 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Antonio Trande [27/12/2015 11:51] : > > I ask again, how can we know if a package .fc(x) compiles/works fine > on Fedora(x+n) without a rebuild? You can't. Fedora uses Koschei to ensure regular scratch rebuilds of its packages but, to my knowledge, this isn't available to RPMFusion developers.

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-27 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? >>> >>> yes we do >>

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > >>Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? > > > >yes we do > > Aparently RPMFusion does not repect the FPG. Packages complying to the FPG > are supposed to have

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not?

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-26 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: > > On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > >> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande > >>>

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-26 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 00:48 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/27/2015 12:26 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? yes we do Aparently RPMFusion does not repect the FPG. Packages complying to the FPG are supposed to have been rebuilt for f23 and therefore to carry a package suffix of ".f23". The

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-26 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/27/2015 12:26 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: >>> On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: On

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-26 Thread Rex Dieter
On 12/26/2015 06:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? yes we do Aparently RPMFusion does not repect the FPG. Packages complying to the FPG are supposed to have been rebuilt for f23 and

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-24 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande >>>

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande > >: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-23 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande >: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > these libraries (and others

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-23 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/22/2015 10:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 21:00 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all,

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-22 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello > > On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on >> Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello  On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all, > > these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on Fedora > 22 and devel branch. > Please, require a rebuild > (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon as poss > ible: > > faad2 >

libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-22 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon as possible: faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame Thanks. - --

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

2015-12-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 21:00 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on > > > Fedora 22 and devel