Hi,
I have also posted this on GitHub but it isn’t clear that was the right place:
https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/522
iCloud Drive will evict files that are unused or when additional space is
needed on the local drive. The evicted files are replace by "bookmark" files
that allow MacOS
I kind of like that rsync isn't mutating into crap at the rate everything
else is.
--
bkw
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 2:38 PM Filipe Maia via rsync
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there plans to soon move to github or some other place where people
> can easily contribute to rsync, making the software discussio
Rsync should not be responsible for detecting what a filesystem can handle.
That makes the most sense to me. There are countless filesystems, each
with their own quirks, and countless mkfs and mount options which just
multiplies the possible fs behaviors even more. Best to provide controls
an
Any possibility of a version of rsync that doesn't need RSH or SSH?
rsync already doesn't need rsh or ssh.
* On host A (server, with room to accept big uploads):
Edit /etc/rsyncd.conf, add this to the end:
[hostb]
path = /srv/rsync/hostb
auth users = hostb
Edit /etc/rsyncd.s
consider the environment before printing this email.
> --
> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-q
On 6/26/2014 5:36 PM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10675
Summary: rsyncing >2GB file onto fat32 partition should fail
earlier
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: x86
OS/Vers
On 1/13/2014 6:19 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
Yea. Shouldn't be hard to split up. The hard part is some type
of dependable rotation.
You mention "pause"... I have to disconnect so I assume that would
"abort" the transfer. But that triggered another question: would
daemon mode help in this situatio
On 1/13/2014 5:34 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
Ok. I can get the Mac up to version 3 but I'm wondering if
I need to rethink my whole strategy. Since the source is on NFS,
doing a stat on all the files each run may cost me too much
time.
I might need to split it into smaller pieces and then rotate
th
On 5/23/2013 1:28 AM, garvit sharma wrote:
> Please help i have tried many times but i did not found the reason
> behind not syncing up.
What do you expect anyone here to do? This is the rsync mail list not
the lsync mail list. I could tell you a lot about rsync but I have never
used or seen or
On 5/16/2013 2:38 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 15 May 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
I did in the case when it was only one pattern, but that was just a
simplified example.
The actual job involves too many include and exclude patterns to use
--include & --exclude, or even --include-from
On 5/15/2013 8:35 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 15 May 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
rsync -avz /foo/ ${DEST}::root/foo/
This syntax does work in his case, and is easier to read, because it
ends up using the exact same specification "/foo/" and "/foo/" for
both sour
On 5/15/2013 5:17 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 15 May 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
Consider the following directory structure
/foo/aaa/*/*
/foo/bbb/*/*
/foo/ccc/*/*
I want to sync all of /foo,
but exclude /foo/aaa
rsync -avz /foo ${DEST}::root
Firstly, I always recommend that with
On 5/15/2013 4:13 AM, Brian K. White wrote:
Consider the following directory structure
/foo/aaa/*/*
/foo/bbb/*/*
/foo/ccc/*/*
I want to sync all of /foo,
but exclude /foo/aaa
but not exclude any other occurances of "aaa" or "foo/aaa" (be they
files or dirs) that might oc
Consider the following directory structure
/foo/aaa/*/*
/foo/bbb/*/*
/foo/ccc/*/*
I want to sync all of /foo,
but exclude /foo/aaa
but not exclude any other occurances of "aaa" or "foo/aaa" (be they
files or dirs) that might occur within the other dirs /foo/bbb/*
/foo/ccc/* etc
I don't want
To clarify a little more, trying to do deltas locally doesn't actually
get you anything, because you still have to do all the same disk work on
each end locally even if only deltas were sent over the network. If both
ends are the same machine, generating and reintegrating deltas is just
more cp
On 2/14/2013 5:21 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
On 2/14/2013 9:50 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade
with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I patched
both v3.0.9 and master
On 2/14/2013 9:50 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Hi,
Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade
with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I patched
both v3.0.9 and master branch and included the patches here.
If this functionality is acceptable I don't mind s
Also -vvv is your friend.
Excluding file foo because of pattern foo
Including file bar because of pattern bar
...
No need to guess and wonder. Just try a few things, run with -vvv,
adjust, retry, after a few trial & error you have what you want. No
excuse for treating it like a big mystery.
list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
---
Brian R Cuttler brian.cutt...@wadsworth.org
Computer Systems Support(v) 518 486-1697
Wadswo
I seem to be running into a problem where I am trying to rsync from a
source directory that lacks write permissions (i.e. r-xr-xr-x).
Presumably this is because rsync creates the directory on the
destination, then sets the permissions to match the source and then
tries to sync the contents of the d
So, like a lot of people, I am using --link-dest to do backups. My
backup target is ext4 so with a hard link limit of 64K. I do end up
with trying to create too many links at some point though and get the
following sequence of events:
rsync: link
"/.snapshots/hourly.0/linux/usr/src/openwrt-r186
You can try to switch to faster filesystems (reiserfs/ext4/btrfs/zfs)
and enable metadata performance options and do other tuning steps
(dir_index, noatime) and upgrade disks and ram etc, but mostly, with a
frankly unrealistic business requirement like that, you have to either
tell business tha
On 4/12/2012 3:36 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) wrote:
it has not been mentioned: nohup !
Yes it was.
--
bkw
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http:/
On 4/12/2012 12:32 PM, Chris Arnold wrote:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:48 PM, "Brian K. White" wrote:
Now just run the rsync command. no nohup, no&.
Just so completely understand, it should be:
rsync --options x no nohup no&
Or am I completely wrong?
No I was saying that
On 4/11/2012 10:05 PM, Chris Arnold wrote:
I hopethis hope this makes sense. How do you make rsync run even when not
physically connected to the server? In other words, I run rsync from the
terminal via vnc and when I log out of the connection, rsync stops running. Is
there a script or somethi
r gpl.
--
bkw
-Original Message-
From: "Thomas Guyot-Sionnest"
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 10:44am
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: cwRsync got killed...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-03-07 05:17 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 3:05 PM,
On 3/7/2012 3:05 PM, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
On 17/02/12 01:58 PM, grarpamp wrote:
Side question: Does anyone know the probability of generating a file with
the same md5 and sha256 which is still looks valid with the expected content
Uhh, zero. Problem is, the author never bothered with o
On 12-01-20 06:01 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> Someone has requested it:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7870
I'm not really sure that is the same bug. Maybe it is. Not convinced
though. I guess I can file my own bug and ask 7870's OP to see if it's
the same issue.
> But is seems like
On 12-01-20 05:42 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> Am I understanding right that your source and your link-dest are
> actually the same path?
Yes they are!
> If so what are you trying to do that wouldn't
> be accomplished with a simple 'cp -l'?
Not all of the files in source and dest are supposed to be t
Using:
# rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6,
Same problem ftp servers have had since decades ago.
And the answer was (initially) to provide a ls-lR file in the top level
directory or in every directory and educate users to use it. Perhaps you
could enforce that by removing the ability to browse/list, but not the
ability to download files
On 11/25/2011 11:23 PM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8416
--- Comment #3 from Cristian Rodríguez 2011-11-26
04:23:34 UTC ---
There is a quirk to be aware of in this systemd unit.
Rsync areturns with non-zero (code 20) exit code when the running servic
On 11/22/2011 6:51 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 21 Nov 2011, Brian K. White wrote:
On 11/19/2011 9:04 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
--include=floof/
On 11/21/2011 3:09 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
> pushfile /path/to/thing
> pushfile /path/to/thing host
pushfile /path/to/thing
OR
pushfile /path/to/thing host
--
bkw
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options:
On 11/19/2011 9:04 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
--include=floof/ --exclude='*' /tmp/. co4::root/tmp/.
Detail: /tmp being the "root of the t
On 11/15/2011 4:15 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
Brian K. White wrote:
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
rsync -avx --delete --include=/file --exclude='*' . host2:deltest/.
This didn't work for me, although one difference is my script specifies
a path instead o
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
rsync -avx --delete --include=/file --exclude='*' . host2:deltest/.
This didn't work for me, although one difference is my script specifies
a path instead of "." Does this only work with literally "." in the
places above?
My script parses the
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
Brian K. White wrote:
Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
explicitly by name?
yes :-)
user@host1:~/deltest> ls -a1
.
..
a
b
c
file
user@host1:~/deltest> ssh host2 ls -a1 deltest
.
..
a
b
c
file
user
On 11/11/2011 5:15 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com) wrote on 11 November 2011 15:59:
>Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
>explicitly by name?
>
>I would have thought that deleting the file locally, the rsyncin
Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
explicitly by name?
I would have thought that deleting the file locally, the rsyncing the
non-existing file with --del would have resulted in the remote file,
which does exist being deleted.
I have a general purpose script t
On 10/26/2011 12:39 AM, Alex Jurkiewicz wrote:
Any comments?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Alex Jurkiewicz wrote:
Hi all,
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The second patch ign
On 10/20/2011 12:08 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I should also point out that I am not making up cool distinctive names
for my config file. I am using that actual host name of the system that
I am trying to connect to so that I can type 'ssh hostname' as i
On 10/19/2011 11:38 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 19Oct2011 22:14, Brian K. White wrote:
| On 10/19/2011 6:58 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
|>On 19Oct2011 12:02, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
|>| rsync has to parse the URL you're passing. The fact that it then
|>| takes that and
On 10/19/2011 6:58 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 19Oct2011 12:02, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Kevin Korb wrote:
|>Because it is an even bigger joy to be able to type 'ssh newhost'
|>and have it just work even though you can't talk to newhost. You
|>can do that by properly
On 9/15/2011 1:17 PM, Alexander Dahl wrote:
Hei hei,
Am 08.09.2011 07:09, schrieb Michael_google gmail_Gersten:
When I signed up for the rsync mailing list, I was not expecting to
get all the samba bugs as well.
Me too.
Is it possible to be on just the rsync mailing list, without being on
t
On 8/1/2011 4:30 AM, Bjorn Madsen wrote:
I thought other might benefit from this lesson learned and thought it
maybe should be added to the man-pages.
I thought my network connection was glitchy and hence set rsync up for
--timeout=120 but I found out that I was actually causing the glitch
with
On 7/15/2011 2:42 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
On 15.07.2011 13:10, Donald Pearson wrote:
Matthias,
A vpn tunnel is an interesting idea. Do you know how long you're able to
keep rsync in limbo before it will give up?
I haven't really tried. But it was about 15 Minutes the one time it
On 7/12/2011 11:10 AM, Donald Pearson wrote:
@Eberhard: I understand what you're trying to say, but in this
environment the reality is rsync reaches and impasse where it is unable
to get beyond work that has already been completed before link failure
cuts it off again.
@Leen: A combination of
On 6/18/2011 8:31 AM, Andre Majorel wrote:
Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is
identical to the source ?
rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files.
-IW
What I don't understand is why p
On 6/6/2011 12:54 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 06 Jun 2011, Cliff Simon wrote:
Hm...I´m using 3.0.3 at the Dest-Server, but now I saw that the Source-Server
has 2.6.9
Do I have to enable incremental recursion and from which version is incremental
supported?
Both ends have to be at least
On 6/2/2011 6:03 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 17:43 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
Perhaps the server side could specify all the deleted files and
directories as being excluded before they are actually removed from the
server. Then the client could use --delete but not --delete
On 6/2/2011 11:28 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 17:08 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
There are other problems too, relating to the difference between "This
directory was deleted from the source and so you DO want to delete it in
your mirror.", vs "This directory w
On 6/1/2011 3:26 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:57 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual problem for me, today, but that's no excuse to avoid
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual problem for me, today, but that's no excuse to avoid
doing the right thing once you recognize it.
--
bkw
On 5/31/2011 1:15 AM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugz
On 4/25/2011 8:10 AM, Alistair Dsouza wrote:
The two rsync calls had a delay of 180 seconds between them but when the
issue was seen the debug prints from the second rsync call were
interspersed with the debug logs of the first rsync call. Our system
startup scripts start just one instance of the
gards
Brian
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On 11/14/2010 12:20 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI
Motohiro wrote:
Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg s
On 8/18/2010 9:18 PM, Vanitha wrote:
The exact syntax is as below
Rsync -r -a -e “ssh -l u...@host1” -h /home/xx/dir-name
u...@host2:/home/xx/dir-name
I doubt it.
--
bkw
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lis
On 8/14/2010 3:09 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 11:26 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
I have sample data that exposes this repeatably:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021889.html
Thanks, but we figured out the problem several months ago and it should
be fixed
I have sample data that exposes this repeatably:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021889.html
If you place old/file.dat on a remote box and then try to overwrite it
with new/file.dat using rsync -az and any other options except --no-z or
-W, it will fail almost immediately, ev
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 02:51:35PM -0700, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:32:42PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> [Set u+s on directories, don't worry about owners]
>
> It seems to work relatively well. I get an error about not being
> abl
f the file than the group of the file.
YMMV
Brian
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:18:11AM -0700, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> I often push files from my user account over SSH to my web server, and
> want them owned by www-user, which may not have a login shell, should
> never
the mailing list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
---
Brian R Cuttler brian.cutt...@wadsworth.org
Computer Systems Support(v) 518
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cvander/1885428341/
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 19:16 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> I'm trying to use rsync filters to achieve the following result:
>>
>> Include /
>> Exclude /home
&
I'm trying to use rsync filters to achieve the following result:
Include /
Exclude /home
Include /home/user1
I've been doing a lot of experimentation and at this point I'm just
staring at the man page. Rsync filters seem to be complicated, and a
result of that I hope they are also powerful.
How
Thanks for the update.
We are using rsync to sync up the Oracle archived transaction logs to
our standby databases.
We would like to control the number of files that could be transfered in
parallel.
Thanks for the update.
Brian
--
Brian P Michael
Technical Management
I am looking for an enhancement to multi-thread or parallelize rsync.
Are there any plans that would allow one to set a parameter, like
'number_of_threads' and
rsync will ship multiple files at the same time?
Sincerely,
Brian P Michael
Technical Management Consultant
Rolta
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 02:59:20PM -0400, Brian Lindholm wrote:
it would be even better if it only rewrote the portions of large files
that had actually changed instead of resending the entire file.
You can use --no-whole-file with --inplace (since rsync's default u
s would help.
Heck, it might even be faster, given that flash reads are faster than
flash writes.
Brian
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://ww
On 3/27/08 10:08 AM, "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:32:30AM -0700, Brian D. McGrew wrote:
>> overflow: linkname_len=2751
>
> Is there a symlink with a really long path in that
> filevault/visionpro/release/4.7.2_fedora
at io.c(1500)
[generator=3.0.0]
hotlap:Source brian$
What am I missing?
-brian
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hello All,
I am having an interesting issue where using the command rsync avP e ssh
seems to want to bail out on filesystems that have more than about 1.2 million
files.
Using that same command on smaller filesystems works like a charm! The server
is rsync 2.6.8 protocol 29 and the destina
On Dec 29, 2007 4:33 PM, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:52 -0500, Brian Poole wrote:
> > I'm experiencing a most unusual problem.. I am copying a directory
> > from one server to another (both Solaris 10/SPARC). No applications
>
lication.) I'm still working on that angle as truss might be my
only hope left. The vendor of the application has also been unable to
offer any insight into this issue and simply suggested that we use
cpio to copy the files... *shudders*
Oi... Any ideas before all my hair has been ripped out?
hi,
rsync administrator.
your ftp site for rsync can not be open recently.
ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/rsync/
please check.
thanks for your software.
--- ps.
Name: rsync
URL: ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/rsync/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "check_ftp.py", line 32, in ?
My rsync was working from a cron job for a long time. Suddenly, I
started to get the error:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 85 bytes: phase "unknown"
[receiver]: Broken pipe (32)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
/SourceCache/rsync/rsync-20/rsync/io.c(909)
I
e service. ( I have tried what
Jean-Gabriel was trying already and gave up for now. )
Brian
--
Contagious Design!
web . design . linux software . photo
Brian Rose . programmer
Stacey Rose . designer
(604)-588-8827 . b_roseATshawDOTca
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/m
lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
---
Brian R Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Systems Support(v) 518 486-1697
Wadsworth Center(f) 518 473-6384
NYS Departmen
r "
rsync -aurvlpogt -e ssh kk.txt XXX.YYY.ZZZ:/path/to/pruebas1". For the
latter, you'll have to get ssh working between the two systems.
Brian
--
Contagious Design!
web . design . linux software . photo
Brian Rose . programmer
Stacey Rose . designer
(604)-588-8827 . b_roseATshawDOT
nc changes them back. Does
this have something to do with cygwin=ntsec or
nontsec? I am not using either of them right
now--should I? Also, I heard ssh has a problem
with one of these settings. Is that still the case?
Suggestions, please?
Brian
--
Client Info
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:22:27AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:48:33PM -0400, Brian Childs wrote:
> > Yes. Without the -b, it doesn't happen.
>
> OK, I think I know why now: without -b the old inode goes away, and
> thus NFS gets some indic
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:01:48AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:21:55PM -0400, Brian Childs wrote:
> > rm -f /tmp/testpath/* $HOME/testpath/*
> >
> > #Prime it
> > echo some data > /tmp/testpath/testfile
> > sleep 1
> > rsync
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:18:46AM -0400, Brian Childs wrote:
> As a response to my original post, here's a patch that implements my
> proposed solution.
>
> I've tested it, and it fixes the problem, but I'm afraid there may be
> some hidden consequences of doing t
As a response to my original post, here's a patch that implements my
proposed solution.
I've tested it, and it fixes the problem, but I'm afraid there may be
some hidden consequences of doing this.
If anyone can think of anything, please let me know.
Thanks,
Brian
--- rsync-2.
s the output:
total 0
483079 -rw-r--r-- 1 briansource10 May 6 18:05 testfile
total 0
483079 -rw-r--r-- 1 briansource10 May 6 18:05 testfile
total 0
483080 -rw-r--r-- 1 briansource26 May 6 18:05 testfile
483079 -rw-r--r-- 1 briansour
this feature! Thanks again John for the patch
and Wayne for the mods and including it in the patches directory!!
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I can't address the algoritm questions but I'll tell you that we
had a tremendous improvement is speed when we switched to a newer
version of rsync.
We are using it (in this case) to rsync our oracle files to a
separate partition on the system cpu.
> I'm using rsync to copy some large (>1GB) ora
ought that
might be a small opportunity for me to give back to the project. I could
create the RPM for 2.6.1 when it is released too.
-Brian
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:59:19PM -0400, Brian McEntire wrote:
> > rsync -av -e ssh --one-file-system
Then I deleted /test/tmp/tmp from A. Reran the sync with the command
above but, /backups/A/test/tmp/tmp was not deleted on B.
It is as if the --delete parameter was not recognized.
Any ideas? Thanks!!
Brian
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
I didn't write the patch, so I can only beg :-) ...
That patch will be very useful to me too!
To the patch author: would it be much more trouble to specify a stop time
rather than just a delay? If I want to backup a varying number of systems
from cron and limit them to "off hours", the --time-l
the way it's installed now.
When I try executing the commands above I get the following error:
permission denied
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)
Brian M. Cross
--
To unsubscribe or
try rsync,
ssh with a double colon instead of the single as
it talks about in the rsync man pages. That is
only for 2.5.6, I think, and above. However, the
caveat is I never got rsync to work with ssh AND
connecting to the rsyncd.
Brian
--
Contagious Design!
web . design . linux software
here are any better ways to do this, I'm still all ears.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Brian McEntire wrote:
> Thanks Wayne!
>
> > reading of the files on the source machine. However, you can include
> > all the source filesystems as args in a single copy command and it will
>
Thanks Wayne!
> reading of the files on the source machine. However, you can include
> all the source filesystems as args in a single copy command and it will
> enforce the single-filesystem (inode-based) restriction separately for
> each arg you specify:
>
> rsync -avxR -e ssh --numeric-ids
Use # find on the remote system and list | rm files that meet
your date criteria ?
> I'm not on the list but I just wanted to throw my positive feedback out
> there. I've been using rsync to backup work that I generate within a
> lab to an offsite system. If I lost this data ...
>
> So great.
mote
side are not part of the remote file system but they are part of the dest
file system and so are deleted by rsync.
I'd much rather do this in a "pull" configuration similar to the commands
given above than "pushing" the files... if possible.
Any ideas? Did I mi
I'm not the command line guru, but it is my understanding that if you've
got rsyncd running at boot time, any user can rsync over ssh to his or
her home directories without requiring root access.
I can't imagine a time when you'd need them to access other directories,
except maybe /var/html and
We always run rsync from a shell script, sometimes we pipe the
shell script output to mailx or such. I'm sure you can write
it to a log file but don't recall the syntax off hand.
We never run the single command as a cron task, ie never
0 23 * * 1-5 rsync
but do
0 23 * * 1-5 script1.sh
I'm sur
ith
seemingly with no complaints.
Are there any caveats I should be aware of?
Brian
--
ContagiousDesign!
web . design . software . photo
Brian Rose . programmer
Stacey Rose . designer
(604)-588-8827 . b_roseATshawDOTca
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsyn
unix clients are 2.5.6.
Why does the windows setup give only the date and not the time?
Brian
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
