[rt-users] Re: Missing comments from Web interface

2007-10-01 Thread Pawel Weglewski
> Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:49:19 +0200 > From: Pawel Weglewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rt-users] Missing comments from Web interface > To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I have a riddle. I'

[rt-users] minor html correction to RT

2007-10-01 Thread Dirk Pape
Hello Jesse, sorry posting this after you having 3.6.5 out, but these are only minor corrections Since Safari tries to be very smart with table width:auto*, I set table width:100% on body lauyout tables on some pages.

[rt-users] pls. add a callback to /Admin/Users/Modify and change RT::Extension::MergeUsers

2007-10-01 Thread Dirk Pape
Hello, I observed that RT::Extension::MergeUsers overwrites /Admin/Users/Modify.html which is not good for two reasons: - after updating RT this modified version will be overwritten by the original RT-version and MergeUsers looses its GUI - the version in MergeUser is a modification from an

[rt-users] [Rt-announce] RT 3.6.5 now available

2007-10-01 Thread Jesse Vincent
This release of RT is primarly a bugfix release for RT 3.6.4, though a few small improvements did manage to creep into the codebase. You can download the new release at: http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/release/rt-3.6.5.tar.gz A GPG signature of the download can be fetched from: http://

[rt-users] How-To? Required Custom Field

2007-10-01 Thread Thierry Thelliez
Using RT 3.6.4, I am trying to make a custom field to be required at Ticket creation time (through the SelfService interface). This field has the 'Select One Value' type. I set the Validation field to: '(?#Mandatory).' but this did not work. I could still create a ticket. Reading other threads I

Re: [rt-users] Get RT to send mail 7-bit encoded?

2007-10-01 Thread Ole Craig
Don't know about the feasibility of (3) but speaking as a past-life sitewide postmaster and email admin I'd suggest going with (1) or possibly (2). An MTA that doesn't check on what the receiving MTA will accept is not an animal for which I'd be willing to take on the care and feeding. Che

[rt-users] CommandByEmail

2007-10-01 Thread j0ey.de
Heyas, anyone found a solution for this "bug"? http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27333 Greets, joey ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMA

Re: [rt-users] E-Mail issues

2007-10-01 Thread Tim Hibbard
OK, not enough coffee yet, SendEmail.pm and not sendmail. lol, enjoy your week. Daniel Jenning wrote: Hi, Thanks for the idea, however I just edited SendEmail.pm to change the sender address to the 'from' address, which sorts it out nicely. It seems it's the program 'sendmail' that's adding

Re: [rt-users] E-Mail issues

2007-10-01 Thread Tim Hibbard
Howdy, I'm using Postfix so I will have to see if the same manipulation can be done. Thanks for the hint, Tim Daniel Jenning wrote: Hi, Thanks for the idea, however I just edited SendEmail.pm to change the sender address to the 'from' address, which sorts it out nicely. It seems it's the

[rt-users] Get RT to send mail 7-bit encoded?

2007-10-01 Thread Otmar Lendl
Hi, Last week I had to debug an ugly scenario where one person received mangled emails from RT (truncated text, botched 8-bit characters (Umlauts)). It turned out that this only affected mail to a certain ISP, and only when the mail contained larger attachments as well (and not just text). This

RE: [rt-users] E-Mail issues

2007-10-01 Thread Daniel Jenning
Hi, Thanks for the idea, however I just edited SendEmail.pm to change the sender address to the 'from' address, which sorts it out nicely. It seems it's the program 'sendmail' that's adding the 'nobody' header to sender, but only if its blank. -Original Message- From: Tim Hibbard [mail