(mostly
by the router).
It required some back-compat breakage, and since the inflector isn't a
large cost even in tiny API-like requests, we dropped it.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com wrote:
OK, the alternation is a red herring.
I have
What do you mean?
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Jeremy Kemper jeremykem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Sergey Nartimov just.l...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm going to add deprecation to String#encoding_aware? method and
remove all of its usage
If there are Ruby engines with only partial 1.9 support, and we want to
support them, we should probably PDI whether we are in a position to drop
1.8 support at this time.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Kemper jeremykem...@gmail.comwrote:
Encoding
to satisfy the dependencies from
your local gems. Unfortunately, it will not always work.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Creating a new Rails app nowadays in my computer with Bundler-pre takes
about 6s only
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
2011/12/19 Nicolás Sanguinetti h...@nicolassanguinetti.info
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Steve Klabnik st...@steveklabnik.com
wrote:
throw/catch for flow control is bad.
Indeed it is. It's the one thing in Sinatra I always disliked.
If I had to choose
.
I don't want to build a process around the assumption of no mistakes.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Kemper jeremykem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Mislav mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote:
Rails 3.1.2.rc2 just got released. Around
class_attribute works by creating a method on the class, and creating
methods should be reliable.
Additionally, class_attributes are used for configuration during boot,
which is not a threadsafe environment.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Nick Urban nickur
Agreed. Class attributes have similar threading semantics to class
variables, with the improvement that they inherit properly.
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Michael Koziarski
mich...@koziarski.comwrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2011 at 8:06 AM, Nick Urban
to be used at all except in a test
The short version is that ActionDispatch and ActionController use a lot of
the dependencies, but ActionView does not.
I would like to propose that we break out ActionView into its own gem with
only a few dependencies, and make ActionPack depend on it.
Yehuda Katz
Chief
There are things that the C require code does in 1.9 that slow things down.
One such example is re-checking $LOAD_PATH to make sure it is all expanded
on every require. This is something that should be addressed by ruby-core.
I'll open a ticket on redmine if there isn't one already.
Yehuda Katz
Or even easier:
# Gemfile
gemspec
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Strobe
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Jan jan.h@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
rr.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07-12-2010 18:34, Michael Koziarski wrote:
I wanted
of
body, if Rack is calling #close on the result from #body (maybe something
like string_body). Alternatively, we may want to create a debugging response
object, and a to_something method to convert a response to that, but I worry
that it has untold potential for breakage.
Yehuda Katz
Architect
I like that! :finalize = true works for me (I'd rather not make the
API expose the reason for the API)
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert Pankowecki
robert.pankowe...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, I kinda like provide, but I like final_content_for
better. Mostly, I feel like
Can you submit this as a pull request on GitHub?
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Teng Siong Ong siong1...@gmail.com wrote:
patch added:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/5613-adding-j-parameter-for-rails
Just to be clear, I'm in favor of pull requests for patch management;
don't have a strong opinion about bug reports (yet)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Chad Woolley thewoolley...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com wrote:
I
require
zoom/library_name, not require File.dirname(__FILE__) + library_name
from the zoom directory.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM, byrnejb byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
Why does Ruby-1.9.2-p0 require an additional ../ for relative paths
when
That's why we have after_commit in Rails 3. ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 2, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Michael Koziarski mich...@koziarski.com wrote:
In my mind, observer callbacks should not be fired inside the AR transaction
to avoid race conditions when observers kick of processes that try and
rails new myapp --skip-active-record
:-D
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
rr.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to prevent Rails 3 from using an ORM? In Rails 2, it used
to have a description
Whoops! --skip-activerecord
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe the option isn't in the docs because it doesn't exist on Rails 3
beta 4... This command-line didn't work for me...
Em
load for Rake tasks.
I'm surprised nobody else hit this before.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Mislav Marohnić
mislav.maroh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:15, Michael Koziarski mich...@koziarski.comwrote:
Either way
Bundler does not currently support a mode of operation without Rubygems, but
we plan to add such a mode in 1.1.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM, rogerdpack rogerdp...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently rails 2.3.8 and 3.0 all force a full
You can do something like this in Rails 3:
render :partial = foo.html if you're in an XML template et al.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.dewrote:
Yehuda has a nice article on implementing a custom
.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 10:40 AM, rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com wrote:
Request (unless rails already does this...)
Currently with active_support it reloads the class chain at the
beginning of each incoming HTTP request.
Suggestion
Person.say_hello
end
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 10:43 AM, rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am under the impression that if config.threadsafe! was set that it
preloaded all files in the require paths, instead of using autoload.
Suggestion: use
/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
--
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
:
On 27.5.2010, at 18.11, Yehuda Katz wrote:
At every talk I give at a conference, I ask whether people use jQuery
in their Rails apps. In every case, close to 100% of the room raises
their hands.
In all fairness, I think that's a bit misleading question. I raised my hand
when you asked it in Frozen
I agree. Let's get 3.0 out and table this until then.
Deal?
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Norman Clarke nor...@njclarke.com wrote:
Why? SQLite3 was made the default database in 2.0.2 and the world
didn't stop. It's a change
about this topic.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Norman Clarke nor...@njclarke.com wrote:
I suppose once 3.0 is released and it's just as easy to use jQuery
with Rails as Prototype, it should be easy to determine which one
people
) to achieve this.
In the end, the rule is simple and consistent. Direct instances of String
are always not html_safe. This means that concatenating safe Strings onto a
String results in an unsafe String.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Mislav
I'd recommend render_to_string :inline for this case.
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 May 2010 07:22, Michael Koziarski mich...@koziarski.com wrote:
But I'd question what you're trying
Simply calling content_for(:name) should work :)
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Brian Durand
br...@embellishedvisions.comwrote:
In Rails 3 the only way to get for content captured with the
content_for method in a view is to call yield
, which would (at very
least) pick up the default language from the environment.
I have some more comments inline.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Czarek cezary.bagin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:15:54PM +0200, Mislav
Yeah! Let's fix that :)
I intended to actually mention that I used a stylesheet, but then totally
forgot. Fail!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Joe Smith unknown_kev_...@hotmail.comwrote:
Kristian Mandrup kmand...@gmail.com wrote
Maybe we should fork these kinds of gems into the Rails repo and point them
out in the guides? In my view, we'll eventually roll some of these solutions
into Rails once they get robust, and used by more people, so let's encourage
that!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
majority of the performance improvement would
likely apply to using that helper in a dynamic context. And of course, we
can always improve the performance of helpers like link_to much more (a
focus of 3.0 and even more in future versions of Rails).
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
internally marks its own Strings as safe, which is why you don't need
to mark form_for, link_to, etc. as html_safe.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Daniel Schierbeck
daniel.schierb...@gmail.com wrote:
That seems reasonable. Perhaps the tainting
This is actually what the Isolated test case is for. You'll see that we use
it extensively in Railties specifically to isolate tests from added
dependencies.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Jeroen van Dijk
jeroentjevand...@gmail.com wrote
I think a better approach would be testing each module in isolation for its
intended purpose. So in other words, try JUST pulling in Rendering into a
Metal and see that it actually can support all the rendering cases in the
Rendering module.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
dependency to = 1.0.0 is a problem because Rails
could potentially break if a new (incompatible) version of Rack is released.
The entire purpose of the ~ dependency is to say I know for sure I work on
Rack 1.0.x, but not some future version.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
Responses inline.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Hongli Lai hon...@phusion.nl wrote:
On Feb 22, 11:25 am, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hongli,
This is a classic problem of the sort Bundler was created to solve. The only
possible solutions are to either ensure
Gems are loaded first so that, if they want, they can set things up for
application configuration. If you want to hook into a LATER point, you can
create your own Railtie and provide an #initializer, which you can set to
run whenever you want :)
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph
We're moving away from global locations for this stuff anyway. Your
application object should have a paths object on it with the locations of
each conceptual location :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Nick Quaranto n...@quaran.to wrote:
Just my two cents, leave the method as
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Andrew White an...@pixeltrix.co.ukwrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 01:32, Yehuda Katz wrote:
What I'd like to understand is what the various cases are that could
trigger this branch. In particular, I'm
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Andrew White an...@pixeltrix.co.uk wrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 12:11, Yehuda Katz wrote:
I couldn't think of or find any reason for these cases to be different.
My guess is that the behavior was added
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Andrew White an...@pixeltrix.co.uk wrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 13:31, Yehuda Katz wrote:
I wouldn't. I consider Rails' lookup from disk to be an alternate form of
constant lookup, and I'd want it to use
to see what the
original case was that caused the exception to be added in the first place.
Presumably, it was added in order to catch a common (but infuriating) case
of some kind.
Any thoughts?
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Ryan Kinderman
Jonas,
Little did you know, but tags are a non-renewable resource. We must conserve
our tags or soon there will be none left!
In all seriousness, the tag is pushed ;)
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Jonas Nicklas jonas.nick
In Rails 3.0, the Engine class is the superclass of Application. We got
pretty far along, but there are some kinks that need to be worked out in 3.x
before the ideas Carl and I outlined are seamless.
Keep an eye out!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010
was around.
Bottom line: there's a bunch of options right now, and the community should
really converge on a few really good ones. I personally like putting the
railtie in lib/my_lib.rb for gems that are only used as Rails plugins.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Wed, Jan 20
into Railties as well, but be aware that it's still
undergoing rapid API refinement, and most obvious gaps are on the short list
to resolve before the beta.
So... if you have any patches for master, now's the time!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--
You received this message because
Yes.
I am working on a blog post now, but the basic idea is that
ActionController, ActiveRecord, etc. are all plugins now. So anything that
they can do, you can do too.
We just need to document how it works (if you're interested, check out the
railtie.rb files in the various components).
Yehuda
Two troubleshooting steps:
Can you paste the gem list --all on both machines?
Can you puts caller in rexml/document on the machine that's pulling it in
and paste it here?
Thanks!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Pito pitosa...@gmail.com
In order to properly troubleshoot, I need step 2, but try gem cleanup on
both machines and see if it fixes it.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Pito Salas r...@salas.com wrote:
Gems on the machine where the gem is not automatically pulled
library...)
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Pito Salas r...@salas.com wrote:
The trick here is that rexml/document is only required inside this
conditional (in core_ext/rexml.rb):
unless (defined?(REXML::VERSION) ? REXML::VERSION
We use @_ivars in cases where an instance variable is to be used internally
in a module that will be mixed into a user's class or a class that will be
inherited by a user's class.
For instance, we use @_ivars in ActionController::Base and modules mixed
into ActionController::Base.
Yehuda Katz
2-3-bench is no longer needed and can be removed.
All 3.0 work is being done on master; some of that work is backported to the
2.3 series via 2-3-stable.
Hope that helps,
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Caio Chassot li...@caiochassot.com
to hear specific, concrete problems. I assure you I will take them
seriously.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com wrote:
So far, from my understanding, what you've said is that you want to use
some parts
Can you file a ticket. Let's get this fixed!
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand.
From what I could see, there wasn't an easy way to require I18n, such as
in my example of requiring
That's PRECISELY what we've been doing. If there are cases of dependencies
that are not appropriately required, please file a bug so we can get it
fixed.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
2009/12/15 Nicolás Sanguinetti godf...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:54 PM
I'd like to understand what scenario is implicating disk space here.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Mateo Murphy mateo.mur...@gmail.comwrote:
On 14-Dec-09, at 4:26 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
Are you otherwise concerned about the disk
the disk space occupied by ActiveSupport?
Please explain a bit more exactly what your requirements are that prevent
the use of ActiveSupport in Rails 3.
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:26 AM, botanicus stas...@101ideas.cz wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm
Long-term, we want to try to get away from using global state like
this as much as possible, but fixing it can sometimes open a thorny
can of worms. Koz's solution, paired with a mutex or thread-local (for
threadsafe scenarios) is a good workaround for now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 13, 2009,
Ideally, you'd be able to do:
require rails_xss
... use html_safe here ...
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mislav Marohnić
mislav.maroh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 20:40, Mislav Marohnić
mislav.maroh...@gmail.comwrote
welcome.
--
http://lindsaar.net/
Rails, RSpec and Life blog
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Core group.
To post
to figure out what the abstraction point really was. Are
you available on GTalk? I'm wyc...@gmail.com. I'd love to chat.
-- Yehuda
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds really cool
-2.3.4/lib/
action_mailer/base.rb:437:in `template_root='
from ./ffl.rb:66:in `main'
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails
Just FYI, performed? Is replaced in 3.0 with a check of
self.response_body.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Chris Didyk cdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious about the performed? method in ActionController::Base.
It's not documented, but I've found it useful in a
of hacking knowing
you basically did ... nothing really.
I would like to know what is the Rails core team opinion about that.
Beware - my opinion is just from a user struggling to understand
Rails, not anyone from the core team.
Cheers
--
Cezary Bagiński
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer
I am in favor of a standard delete action, analagous to new and edit. I
can't think of a good reason not to have it--it shows good practice and
isn't exactly a new concept. We have new and edit as HTML precursor
actions for the POST and PUT verbs, why not delete as HTML precursor for
DELETE.
MatthewRudy wrote:
I think this is something that is always annoying.
Namely I have to reinvent a convention to handle this.
Something like pre_delete with a GET
- this is just a proper delete form
and delete with a DELETE
- this does the delete
but I think we deserve to have this baked
Pratik wrote:
-1.
+2
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Yehuda Katzwyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am in favor of a standard delete action, analagous to new and edit. I
can't think of a good reason not to have it--it shows good practice and
isn't exactly a new concept.
It makes
Hey guys,
I'm doing some work on partials and am trying to figure out what the
usage of the variables that are currently assigned is.
Consider a case where you have a partial named _user.html.erb. In Rails
2.3, the following variables are assigned:
* user
* options[:as] if
Kieran P wrote:
Hey,
Yes, it should assume a file of the same type, and raise if there
isn't.
i.e.
index.html.erb renders 'example' , should find example.html.erb or
raise
Same with xml:
index.xml.erb renders 'example' , should find example.xml.erb or
raise
But overwrites
Mislav Marohnić wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 05:19, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com
mailto:wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
In Rails 2.x, if you have an XML template, and try to render a
template
that does not have an XML version, but does have an HTML version, ...
Am I the only one
Hey guys,
There's a patch on the tracker right now that adds support for
polymorphic routes handling collection URLs via the model class. I like
this idea (in fact, we had something like it in Merb), but want to make
sure it won't break any existing assumptions that people are making. If
I
I discussed this some with dbussink, who maintains DO. One of the
problems is that you'd have to be able to convert ? into the native
format, while avoiding ? in Strings. So for instance:
SELECT * from foo where name=? and id = ?
This is a simple case--it can be a lot trickier than that. One
In Rails 2.x, if you have an XML template, and try to render a template
that does not have an XML version, but does have an HTML version, it
will be rendered. XML and HTML are just examples; this is true for any
two mime types.
Is this behavior important? First of all, I'm not sure this is
for this and assign it to me please?
I'll be looking after 2-3-stable until 3.0 ships, so I'll be sure to
have it wrapped up for 2.3.4
--
Cheers
Koz
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
that are submitted via the return key?
This is why I thought that you, at least for forms, would use
the traditional submit event, which would require a DOM scan
(and unfortunately for each new DOM elements updated
via Ajax, too).
Christian
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph
:
if partial_path.respond_to?(:each) and not String === partial_path
Are there use cases where models themselves will respond to each, or
where this approach could otherwise backfire?
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
and wrapping them in a single error
class does not only confuse rescue_from, but also Hoptoad and possibly other
exception tracker applications that try to group similar errors together.
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
My apologies for the delay in responding. I'm a bit new to all of
this. I'll try to explain what's going on exactly.
There are basically two kinds of changes that Carl and I have been
making:
1) Refactoring of existing code. For the most part, the existing tests
have held up reasonably well.
for listening!
-- Yehuda
On Nov 6, 4:24 pm, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DHH,
I honestly just threw in some additional names so it didn't look like I was
gunning for a particular individual. That said, I stand by my original
nomination of Jeremy, and did including patches, and will put
. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:45:13PM -, Yehuda Katz wrote:
I just wanted to nominate Jeremy McAnally for commit rights to Rails.
While most of his patches are documentation, he has done significant,
coton the documentation (including writing pretty much all
On another note, lifo, Form, and manfred-s might be considered as
well.
Looking forward,
Yehuda
On Nov 6, 1:14 pm, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcel,
My nomination came as a result of a comment by DHH yesterday that
people who have consistently contributed good work be given
internationalization, Action Mailer reform, etc). And we should
probably run 1 thread per person.
And of course, there's no guarantee that a nomination automatically
leads to core membership. But it'll certainly shine a bright light on
the person.
--
Yehuda Katz
Web Developer | Procore Technologies
(ph
86 matches
Mail list logo
