[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Michael Pavling wrote in post #977908: Great http://netbeans.org/community/news/show/1507.html ...so now to find another editor/environment that integrates debugging :-( (although no huge rush, as Netbeans6.9 isn't going to *stop* working ...) You have no idea how happy I am to hear

Re: [Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Michael Pavling
On 27 January 2011 16:39, David Chua zhc...@gmail.com wrote: You don't have to :) Just use Rails.vim! Does it have (or can it be configured with) debugging breakpoint debugging? 'Fraid that's a show-stopping requirement for me (to avoid going greyer sooner) Looking at the options, I think I

Re: [Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Michael Pavling
On 27 January 2011 18:31, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: Does it have (or can it be configured with) debugging breakpoint debugging? ... it's so important, I said it twice! :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group.

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: Mostly. I like choices, and I like IDEs, but I wish people would stop trying to use conventional IDEs for Rails. There's really no benefit, and there are lots of disadvantages. Why? Let people use whatever they like.

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Xavier Noria wrote in post #977968: On Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: Mostly. I like choices, and I like IDEs, but I wish people would stop trying to use conventional IDEs for Rails. There's really no benefit, and there are lots of disadvantages. Why? Let

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Please quote when replying. Paul wrote in post #977971: That was my IDE, too. I saw that coming when there was no move to make Rails 3/Ruby 1.9 work well, so I moved to RubyMine. I like it and it is easy to adjust since a lot of stuff is similar. It's too bad about NetBeans, when it worked it

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread eveevans
Before Netbeans I used Aptana (Red Rails) at that time, Aptana wasn't better than Netbeans, but I think now Is a good time for give it a try On Jan 27, 12:41 pm, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 January 2011 18:31, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: Does it have (or can it

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
eveevans wrote in post #978015: Before Netbeans I used Aptana (Red Rails) at that time, Aptana wasn't better than Netbeans, but I think now Is a good time for give it a try No point. I used to use Aptana also. It's no better for Rails than NetBeans, and it's buit on Eclipse, which is a lot

[Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Bruno Santos wrote in post #978012: redcar is awesome use to install $ gem install redcar $ redcar install $ redcar Thanks for the reminder. I'll check it out. As I've said elsewhere, I'll happily use a *good* IDE for Raila if I find one. Best, --  Marnen Laibow-Koser

Re: [Rails] Re: Netbeans dumps Rails

2011-01-27 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Oh, absolutely, but I try to discourage bad choices.  Using an IDE for Rails is IMHO a bad choice. You're wrong Mamen, not a bad choice at all. You may prefer a plain editor, that's fine, but that does not make