[Rails] Re: ruby 1.9.3 causes rbuf_fill timeout, but 1.8.7 does not

On Nov 16, 2:33 pm, KevinC wrote: > Thanks Fred. I just posted a separate thread on this, but will ask > here.  I cannot install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 because it > complains: > > Installing linecache19 (0.5.12) > Gem::InstallError: linecache19 requires Ruby version >= 1.9.2. > Do you have l

[Rails] Re: ruby 1.9.3 causes rbuf_fill timeout, but 1.8.7 does not

Thanks Fred. I just posted a separate thread on this, but will ask here. I cannot install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 because it complains: Installing linecache19 (0.5.12) Gem::InstallError: linecache19 requires Ruby version >= 1.9.2. So, is it the case that Rails 3.1 actually requires Ruby 1.9.2?

[Rails] Re: ruby 1.9.3 causes rbuf_fill timeout, but 1.8.7 does not

On Nov 14, 11:47 pm, KevinC wrote: > > I'm stumped.  Anyone have any timeout problems with ruby 1.9.3?  The > problem is, if I want to use Rails 3.1, I have to use Ruby 1.9.3, > which now breaks all of my old Rails 2 apps. > > I'd appreciate any help. I've no idea about the actual problem, but yo