I have been using 5.1 for some time and am looking to upgrade.
I have found that, where in 5.1, I used to be able to write
$jd: JobDetails(
eval ( $t = ["MTSURVEY", "MTINSTALL", "MTEXCHANGE", "MTMAINT"];
!($t contains getJobType(businessArea, templateJobId) )) )
However, in 5.3.1 thi
on, rule, query]'.
Using jvisualvm, I can see that the memory usage takes a step jump each time I
use the analysis tool and eventually (actually after only 2 usages) I get
OutOfMemoryErrors.
The package compiles just fine.
Is there a known problem with the analysis
Is this paper freely available?
I would be interested in seeing a copy of it since I have recently been using
with Drools to detect all sorts of data conditions in XML documents.
Chris
On 11/01/2013 07:03, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> There was my talk at IntelliFest 2012: "Reasoning with XML Data".
>
Rete structure. Anyway, this time is the maximum gain, but deserilaizing
> the inserted fact in the (Rete) context of the
> saved session is going to cost a little, too.
>
> -W
>
> On 30 September 2012 12:10, Chris Selwyn <mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
>
I have a need to execute a set of rules on a complicated hierarchical data
structure where some of the rules use a bunch of reference facts.
At the moment I load the reference facts and the hierarchical structure into
the WM of a stateless session on every execution.
There are a lot of reference
Please don't let me stop you implementing Wolfgang's solution... I'm sure that
it is the best solution for implementation in a rules engine.
I was just thinking "outside of the box" for a moment.
However, if you are not comfortable with coding outside of a rules engine then
by all means ignore m
If you'll pardon the heresy...
It sounds to me like the whole thing can be solved with an appropriately loaded
hashtable without any need for a rules engine at all!
Chris
On 19/06/2012 11:54, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> On 19/06/2012, zeeshan wrote:
>> Hi Laune,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks very much for you
sls.execute()
creates underneath the covers. That way I
don't have to declare the global in those rulesets that don't use it.
Chris
On 14/02/2012 13:31, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> But you can
>try{ ks.setGlobal(...) } catch( Exception e ){ }
>
> -W
>
> On 14/02/2012
x27;t.
So I would like to be able to automatically test whether the rules that I am
about to execute have the global variable and if they do not then not to insert
the SetGlobal into the batch.
I am using DRools 5.1
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mailing
I have just started looking at Drools 5.3 with a view to running the
Guvnor on Glassfish.
I have been using Drools 5.1 Guvnor on Glassfish 2.1 very happily for
some time but I thought that I should look at upgrading.
In fact, some time ago, I posted instructions here on how to setup
authentication
Of course, in the "then" part of rule1 you will have to set a fact that
is checked in the "when" condition in rule2 to ensure that rule2 is not
executed if rule1 has executed.
Chris
On 28/06/2011 12:30, Manuel Ortiz wrote:
Hello itchupe:
I think you mean what in Drools is called SALIENCE.
L
:-)
Chris
On 02/05/2011 12:13, maav wrote:
> Never mind! I got it working, was some kind of classpath issue.
>
> Nice and well described solution btw!
>
> Best Regards
>
> Mattias
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Authorisation-of-Guvnor-users-on-Glassfis
BRMS bits to them.
If there are any further issues that you would like to see
prioritized for the supported BRMS bits you are using, we will be
glad to work with you through the JBoss Customer Support Portal.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 4/27/11 2:31 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
genda group is a queue
organised as heap.
However, the order in which things happen is very non-deterministic
(presumably due to hashing or something like that) and I am finding it
very difficult to actually pin down an actual 100% reproducible case.
Is there any known problem with the salience mec
n Wed, 3/16/11, Chris Selwyn mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
> From: Chris Selwyn mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Open file leak in Drools Compiler
> To: "Rules Users List" mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.
Isn't it regarded as bad practice to rely on the finalize() method
called by the garbage collector to release such resources?
Chris
On 16/03/2011 17:04, Greg Barton wrote:
> Only if garbage collection never runs. Then you'd already be in trouble. :)
>
> --- On Wed, 3/16/11,
, when "is" is not null (i.e. open), it is forgotten about and not closed.
Isn't this a potential file handle leak?
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
uch a mechanism.
@Sathya,
Hijacking a previous post is unlikely to get you a reply.
Thanks,
Mike
On 16 February 2011 22:04, Chris Selwyn <mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
I am aware of the Guvnor export/import mechanism to move an entire
repository and the method of impo
to another, so far without luck.
Is there such a mechanism?
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
ing if replied to at face
value.
Q. "May I ask you how olod you are?"
A. "Yes, you may."
WME = Working Memory Elements.
Cheers
Wolfgang
2010/12/31 Chris Selwyn <mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>>
I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rathe
I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do :-)
(Isn't english so imprecise?)
(WMEs? Working Memory Entries?)
Chris
On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn <mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
I am trying to understand the usage of "from".
Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get
asserted into the WM?
I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like to fetch
with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM facts but I
do not want
.0.0.1... Connected to localhost."
> Telnet remote: "telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection
> refused"
>
> Considering that, it couldn't be a firewall problem, could it?
>
> Thanks for the help!
> Audrey
>
t.
When I use this like
when
there is a QQ with attr equal to abc
then
...
What this expands to is
Question() attr == "abc"
I was hoping that the condition would be put inside the pattern.
Is it not possible to make "compound" DSL statements that use inli
Maybe a firewall(iptables) issue?
Can you do the telnet from your client box?
Chris
On 16/12/2010 15:33, alim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I downloaded the Standalone Guvnor with JBoss AS Version 5.1 and tried
> running it on Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS with Java 1.6.0_22.
> It seems to start up well, no exception
I have it working on Glassfish V2 just fine... It just works.
Chris
On 16/12/2010 15:37, alim wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the link, Jervis.
>
> Too bad, Guvnor hasn't been tested on Glassfish yet. However, still hoping
> for someone who's got Guvnor running on Glassfish successfully :)
My Guvnor is setup to save its repository in an Oracle database.
However, the DBAs have a schedule that takes the database down at night
for backup.
I am finding that, if I set up the ResourceChangeNotifier/Scanner system
then the resource gets unloaded from the KnowledgeBase when the database
define all
functions in a single function file in Guvnor (uploaded screenshot for
you). With this my simple tests run fine.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
On 12/9/10 11:26 AM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
I am using Drools 5.0.2.
What I didn't mention was that I am constructing my package in
Guvnor..
d
> also show a simple test? I am not able to reproduce with supported bits
> 5.0.1, 5.0.2, and the very soon to be released brms 5.1 (
> http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_enterprise_brms_5_1_saves_the_holiday_shopping_season
> ).
>
> Thanks.
> On 12/9/10 10:20 AM, Chris Selwyn
I don't seem to be able to find how to call one function from another
function in Drools 5.0.
It works just fine in 5.1 but I am having to use 5.0 because my customer
requires me to use a supported version.
Is this a known problem or is there really no way to do it?
Chris S
Thanks Mark,
I'll try to have a look at both of those.
(I'm one of those types that likes to see something happen... It helps
me understand what is going on).
Chris
On 09/12/2010 14:42, Mark Proctor wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 14:15, Chris Selwyn wrote:
>> I would like to unders
I would like to understand more about how my rules are being executed.
Is there a way that I can find out what indexes are being are being created.
I can see the drools.indexLeftBetaMemory (and friends) properties but I
would like to be able to observe the effects that they are having.
Chris
port xml from your repo
that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits)
is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the
issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having spent
oes not happen.
This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to
have to do this.
Chris Selwyn
On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Yes the package is "SWWB2BOutgoing" but it looks as though the package
name simple doesn't get reported in the log file.
I ha
ng.QuestionValidation" in the
ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository.
So my current question is "How is this possible?" Is it maybe a
classloader issue?
Chris
On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A closer look:
On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn <mailto:ch...@selwyn-
I have been using the open source Drools 5.1 where I have been inserting
facts in the RHS of a rule and that has been causing subsequent rules to
fire just fine.
However, I am working at a customer that requires my to use a supported
product, so I have moved my rules over to JBoss Rules 5.0.2 a
uot;equal" as objects but appear in full XML text; this is usually simple
to handle
with a temporary Set, but you'll have to add hashCode and equals to the
JAXB generated classes using the code injection plugin.
Inserting just the root element is not advisable, as you are well
aware of.
-
very much simplifies the WM loading process.
All of the examples that I have seen have a very simple flat
(non-hierarchical) structure that don't really give a hint as to what a
"best practice" might be.
Any suggestions/insights welcome :-)
Chris Selwyn
Does RedHat provide support in the UK as well?
My customer was directed by RedHat to a 3rd party company for Drools
support.
Chris Selwyn
On 09/11/2010 16:11, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
On 11/9/10 10:31 AM, Miguel Fernando Cabrera wrote:
Hello to all,
In my company (an insurance company
;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import org.jboss.seam.annotations.Name;
import org.jboss.seam.security.Identity;
/**
*
* @author Chris Selwyn
*/
@Name("gfauthenticator")
public class GlassfishRealmAuthenticator {
private Logger logger = Logger
mport org.jboss.seam.annotations.Name;
import org.jboss.seam.security.Identity;
/**
*
* @author Chris Selwyn
*/
@Name("gfauthenticator")
public class GlassfishRealmAuthenticator {
private Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(this.getClass().getName());
public boolean authenticate() {
try {
to configure Guvnor to authenticate against
a Glassfish realm or JAAS context and would be willing to help me through?
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
I'm guessing here because I haven't played with rulegroups yet but...
Maybe what you are looking for is CommandFactory.newStartProcess(String
processId, Map parameters)
Chris
On 27/10/2010 21:27, John Peterson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing some experimentation for a business problem and I've h
Thanks Toni,
Hopefully a fix will be forthcoming :-)
Chris
On 21/10/2010 07:56, Toni Rikkola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a bug. I reported it: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-679
>
> Toni Rikkola
>
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
>
>> If I
$" in it cannot be resolved.
If I change these into "." then the problem goes away.
Is this a known problem or am I missing something?
I am using Drools 5.1.1
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://li
enums are more 'static', why enumeration (which is a guvnor
ressource like others, ie a resource you can upload) are not OK ?
Le 19/10/2010 10:24, Chris Selwyn a écrit :
Any takers on my question below... Or have I answered my own question?
Chris
Any takers on my question below... Or have I answered my own question?
Chris
On 17/10/2010 16:51, Chris Selwyn wrote:
> I am developing a set of rules around validating messages in a B2B
> messaging environment and I would like to have my rules builders have
> control of the val
igurable through the Guvnor.
Is there somewhere I can store the set as an artefact in Guvnor and be
accessible at runtime for me to do the check with?
Or should I just code the values into a set in a function?
Chris Selwyn
___
rules-users mail
48 matches
Mail list logo
