merci pour la reponse :)
more below, inline.
>
> Things are different if you are fine working with fully expanded
> expressions.
for all that's worth, that won't do for what i am trying. the point is
to have the generality of alphabets.
>
> > Is there any better way to do this?
>
> An
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:21:54PM -0700, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
>
> > > I followed the instructions from
> > >http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation
> > > and ran into a problem (see below for the dump) when installing the
> > > patches on top of a mint 4.1.1. The folder that is look
> > I followed the instructions from
> >http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation
> > and ran into a problem (see below for the dump) when installing the
> > patches on top of a mint 4.1.1. The folder that is looked after
> > doesn't exist (actually, not even /Users/Shared/sage , my install
>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:56:02AM -0700, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
>
> I followed the instructions from
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation
> and ran into a problem (see below for the dump) when installing the
> patches on top of a mint 4.1.1. The folder that is looked after
> does
I followed the instructions from
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation
and ran into a problem (see below for the dump) when installing the
patches on top of a mint 4.1.1. The folder that is looked after
doesn't exist (actually, not even /Users/Shared/sage , my install
folder is /Applicati
Salut!
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:41:11AM -0700, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
> I am trying to do computations with symmetric functions over different
> alphabets.
>
> This seems to have been part of the SFA package, itself part of the mu-
> EC package, itself considered a deprecated part
