Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue (resolved)

2012-10-10 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:41:47AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > Thanks for fixing this! > The category categories/classical_crystals.py already had an import QQ > before my patch (and it is still there). Should this be removed as well? If you feel like it, sure, go ahead (note: I am only speakin

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue (resolved)

2012-10-10 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Nicolas, > - Starting from trac_8327_universal_cyclotomic_field-cs.patch, Sage > startup was broken due to an import loop. That was in fact due to > the Crystal category recently importing parent: > CombinatorialFreeModule, QQ (which category code should not do). Thanks for fixing this!

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue (resolved)

2012-10-10 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Andrew, Anne, On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > I get the same problem as Andrew if the queue is applied up to > trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch > on sage-5.4.rc0. However, before I was working up to > trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch which is higher

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue?

2012-10-09 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear Andrew and Nicolas, I get the same problem as Andrew if the queue is applied up to trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch on sage-5.4.rc0. However, before I was working up to trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch which is higher in the queue, and there everything works again. Some subsequent patch m

[sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue?

2012-10-09 Thread Andrew Mathas
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:58:11AM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote: >Your two patches: > * trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-nt.patch > * trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch >both seem to break the 5.3 queue. I haven't checked 5.4-rc1. Are you sure? I haven't changed

[sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue

2012-07-07 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Sage-Combinat Developers, > Anne: > Please hold off committing any changes for right now. And don't try to update/merge either! In fact, it would be useful if you could let me know if you updated after Jul 07 00:58:19 2012 +0800 (33 hours ago). If in doubt, go to .../sage/devel/sage-com

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue

2012-05-09 Thread Christian Stump
> There was still an issue upon running Sage. Travis: I temporarily > disabled your patch altogether, because it was conflicting with > another one. you guys are still working? Pas mal! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue

2012-05-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:35:21PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > Nicolas fixed this, it works again for me. There was still an issue upon running Sage. Travis: I temporarily disabled your patch altogether, because it was conflicting with another one. Cheers, Nicol

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue

2012-05-09 Thread Anne Schilling
Nicolas fixed this, it works again for me. Anne On 5/9/12 8:59 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: > Queue doesn't apply on 5.0.rc0, and sage doesn't start as a result. > > applying concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch > patching file sage/combinat/permutation.py > Hunk #6 FAILED at 122 > 1

[sage-combinat-devel] Broken queue

2012-05-09 Thread Franco Saliola
Queue doesn't apply on 5.0.rc0, and sage doesn't start as a result. applying concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch patching file sage/combinat/permutation.py Hunk #6 FAILED at 122 1 out of 234 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sage/combinat/permutation.py.rej patch failed, unabl