[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-21 Thread Andrew Mathas
> If it's possible to make the base ring a LaurentPolynomialRing that > may be more efficient than making it a rational function field. > Presumably whether you can do this depends on whether you > encounter denominators that are not powers of x. Unfortunately, this is not possible and, to a larg

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-21 Thread Daniel Bump
> I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke > algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over > the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I > gave up and went back to using some gap3 code that I have, which > builds on chevie, be

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:27:08PM -0800, Andrew Mathas wrote: > It looks like this patch already has a positive review. Yeah, thanks Florent! Feel free to double check the change to the Iwahori-Hecke file. > I'm also stuck in limbo with sage at the moment as I foolishly > upgraded to macosx lio

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-19 Thread Andrew Mathas
Thanks Nicolas! > This is now #12528. You are welcome to do a review of the small change > in the Iwahori Hecke file (or more!). It looks like this patch already has a positive review. I'm also stuck in limbo with sage at the moment as I foolishly upgraded to macosx lion, so I'm still using 4.7.

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-17 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Andrew, On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:39:14PM -0800, Andrew Mathas wrote: > OK, it looks like permutations might be innocent and the real culprit > might be e rational functions as suggested by Dima. I profiled the last calculation with run_snake: sage: run_snake("prod( (L[k]-x**c)/(

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote: > >> This is interesting; we should profile this. Can you give a precise >> description of how you constructed the algebra, and a typical >> calculation you wanted to run? >> >> Permutations are written in Cython, and should be rather fast.

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew Mathas
> This is interesting; we should profile this. Can you give a precise > description of how you constructed the algebra, and a typical > calculation you wanted to run? > > Permutations are written in Cython, and should be rather fast. On the > other hand, Weyl group elements could be slow (their ac

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote: > I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke > algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over > the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I > gave up and went back to using

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
> I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke > algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over > the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I > gave up and went back to using some gap3 code that I have, which > builds on chevie, bec

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-14 Thread Andrew Mathas
I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I gave up and went back to using some gap3 code that I have, which builds on chevie, because it wa

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:14:17AM +0100, Christian Stump wrote: >> for your attantion. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.5566v1.pdf >> >> If someone has the time to look into it: please, please report! > > I did not know Meinolf was doing