Nick wrote:
I use RR(expr) and find it at least as usable as the N[expr] notation
of Mathematica.
and William wrote:
We should learn a lot about how
Mathematica/Maple, etc., work, and why, but then make a _choice_
for SAGE that is a reasonable trade-off between various options.
Python is
On 7/10/07, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found myself using numerical_approx() instead of RR() because
it is also placed at the end of the line and so is relatively easy to
locate the cursor there and add it. With RR(), one has to wrap the
code in a function and then unwrap it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:54:31PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
On 7/10/07, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really like the idea of modules that imitate various
environments, i.e. I don't think it's possible or desirable for us to
try to look specifically like any other
On 7/11/07, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the init file idea needs to be pushed harder. I already do this and
the
flexibility is absolutely critical to my happiness. I even have my init file
call another file in the current directory so I can have different things
Hi,
I now have someone here at my company that is going to help maintain
spkgs. We have a number of spkgs that i) SAGE currently doesn't have
and ii) SAGE does have but we have updated or added bug fixes. A
while back there was agreement on a new standard format for what the
structure of an
I would be willing to chip in some effort on the mathematica.sage
file, although not in the very near future. I plan to begin migrating
my undergraduate courses to sage from mathematica for fall semester
2008. I hope to convince other faculty do to the same, but it won't
be easy. I am mainly
On 7/11/07, Brian Granger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I now have someone here at my company that is going to help maintain
spkgs. We have a number of spkgs that i) SAGE currently doesn't have
and ii) SAGE does have but we have updated or added bug fixes. A
while back there was agreement on a
On 7/11/07, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be willing to chip in some effort on the mathematica.sage
file, although not in the very near future. I plan to begin migrating
my undergraduate courses to sage from mathematica for fall semester
2008. I hope to convince other faculty
Well the biggest reason is just inertia: my department has been using
mathematica for years, and everyone has a full set of computer labs
and handouts and demos already done in mathematica. Why learn a new
system and have to port everything over? We don't even directly pay
for the license as a
I got swamped by teaching, SAGE Days 4, SIMUW, and... buying a house
this week (!), so I haven't been able to move anything forward.
Fortunately, I have no formal responsibilities for the next two
months, so a lot is likely to happen in the near future.
Nice!
My plan is to start working on
10 matches
Mail list logo
