Try alpha3, and ignore my last email. William and I have been re-working js.py
quite a bit. As of alpha2, I think you needed to use ctrl-backspace to delete
a cell. That didn't last long, and backspace is back in alpha3. Please tell
me if you find otherwise.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Robert Mil
Haha, yeah, it almost makes your solution look "simple" at this point.
I filed a bug report in their trac.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:22 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Yi Qiang wrote:
>
> > I debugged this some more with Craig Citro and it turns ou
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Yi Qiang wrote:
> I debugged this some more with Craig Citro and it turns out it's a bug
> in Colloquy itself. It seems that on Leopard system it links against
> Python 2.3 by default. I've recompiled it so it links against Python
> 2.5 if it exists and falls back to
On OSX 10.5/Firefox 2, I cannot delete cells in a notebook worksheet
as of sage-3.0.alpha2.
On Apr 9, 9:48 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:56 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Apr 9, 8:40 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > dortmund.de> wrote:
> > Can somebody o
I debugged this some more with Craig Citro and it turns out it's a bug
in Colloquy itself. It seems that on Leopard system it links against
Python 2.3 by default. I've recompiled it so it links against Python
2.5 if it exists and falls back to Python 2.3 if it does not (so it's
still compatible on
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:56 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 9, 8:40 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> Can somebody on OSX 10.4 try the spkg at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/polybori-0.3.1.p0.spkg
> You need to first install the updated linbox.spkg at
> http:
On Apr 9, 8:16 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to reopen discussion of #2781, "bool() for SymbolicEquation
> > should raise an error when it doesn't know the answer". Jason created
> > a p
> I personally dislike the idea of extracting things as self-extracting
> executables, both because I don't think people should get in the
> habit of downloading and double-clicking on .exe files, and also
> because it means the VM-ware image can't be (easily) accessed from
> non-windows
On Apr 9, 10:29 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> It is *341* MB vs. *601* MB, i.e. Winzip is 80% larger than 7z. If it
> were 10% I couldn't care less. And an 80% size increase is something
> that is noticeable at the end of the month. Bandwidth isn't free, in
> the end somebo
Since x>=0 returns unevaluated, the problem seems like it is with the
if statement, which is turning "maybe" into false. In Mathematica, the
if statement would return unevaluated (for symbolic input into g).
On Apr 9, 9:18 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to reopen discussion
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to reopen discussion of #2781, "bool() for SymbolicEquation
> should raise an error when it doesn't know the answer". Jason created
> a prototype patch to implement this, but gave up on it and closed the
> tic
Hi,
I have no intention of starting a flame war either. :)
> > Instead of switching to to Winzip I would much rather use the "Self-
> > extracting capability for 7z format" of 7zip. Bandwidth is a finite
> > resource and I am not convinced that using some crappy old compression
> > technology i
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:18 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 10, 1:19 am, "Yi Qiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> William forgot to CC sage-devel.
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: use zip instead
I'd like to reopen discussion of #2781, "bool() for SymbolicEquation
should raise an error when it doesn't know the answer". Jason created
a prototype patch to implement this, but gave up on it and closed the
ticket when he was convinced that "this is not pythonic".
I like the "raise an exceptio
Hi, Michael,
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:56 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 8:40 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
>
> Can somebody on OSX 10.4 try the spkg at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SPKG/
> polybori-0.3.1.p0.spkg
> You need to first install the updated linbox.spkg at
>
On Apr 10, 1:19 am, "Yi Qiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William forgot to CC sage-devel.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM
> Subject: Re: use zip instead of 7zip for distributing the sage binary
> To: Yi
> I'm interested.
I took the liberty to mail the boundle to your gmail address.
What is the preferred way to submit a bundle?
> It seems like it. We should fix this. Does your
> bundle fix this?
No, I did not want to modify the behaviour of the code...
-gerhard
--~--~-~--~~-
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:37 PM, gerhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * The _tasteful_ticks routine in axes.py that
> implements 2D plot tick marks restricts the
> range of values of the axis.
>
> Since I needed additional functionality,
> I implemented a different version for my use.
> I h
* The _tasteful_ticks routine in axes.py that
implements 2D plot tick marks restricts the
range of values of the axis.
Since I needed additional functionality,
I implemented a different version for my use.
I have a mercurial bundle available if there is
interest?
* The actual bounds used for the
-- Forwarded message --
From: Einar Steingrimsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Subject: Thanks for Sage!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear William,
I have been using Sage in the last couple of months, after having used
mostly Mathematica for years. One of my c
William forgot to CC sage-devel.
-- Forwarded message --
From: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: use zip instead of 7zip for distributing the sage binary
To: Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Yi Qiang <[
Hi all,
When creating binary releases for Sage in the future, could we please
put out a release in the 'zip' format as well as '7z'?
The success rate of installing Sage in my algebraic geometry class is
incredibly low. Today 2 students told me they couldn't get Sage
working on their Windows machi
Do you use Leopard? I don't know if pyobjc is distributed in pre 10.5.
Any chance you've installed a different Python.framework other than
what's shipped in /System/Library/Frameworks?
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yi,
>
> This sounds like a much b
On Apr 9, 8:40 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> In other news: The world hates me. The latest PolyBoRi is borken on
> OSX 10.4 - see #2865. It appears that stripping bundles on OSX 10.4 is
> a bad thing. Since I wanted debugging support for PolyBoRi anyway I
> will look int
On Apr 9, 8:48 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
>
> sage -t devel/doc/prog/prog.tex
>
> [3.6 s]
> sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
>
> [27.6 s]
> All tests passed!
> Total time for all tests: 4129.4 seconds
> [EMAIL PROT
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here is alpha3. Loads of small fixes, a total of 141 tickets
> have been closed for the 3.0 milestone so far.
>
> First the good news:
>
> The Fortran doctest issue has been fixed by Josh Kantor.
>
> Now the not so good news:
>
> Issue: Invalid read in libgr
On Apr 9, 8:33 pm, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Built fine and all tests passed on
Great.
> Linux sillyname 2.6.22-gentoo-r5 #2 SMP Tue Aug 28 23:46:12 UTC 2007
> i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Built fine and all tests passed on
Linux sillyname 2.6.22-gentoo-r5 #2 SMP Tue Aug 28 23:46:12 UTC 2007
i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Best,
Alex
mabshoff wrote:
| Hello folks,
|
| here is alpha3. Loads of smal
+1 (on the error message)
Kiran
On Apr 9, 9:12 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yi,
>
> This sounds like a much better approach than what I did, but when I
> run that I get an error message about not being able to find the objc
> module?
>
> david
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:54 AM,
Yi,
This sounds like a much better approach than what I did, but when I
run that I get an error message about not being able to find the objc
module?
david
On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Yi Qiang wrote:
>
> Hey,
> I thought this was a great idea but I found the patching Colloquy
> approach to
Hello folks,
here is alpha3. Loads of small fixes, a total of 141 tickets
have been closed for the 3.0 milestone so far.
First the good news:
The Fortran doctest issue has been fixed by Josh Kantor.
Now the not so good news:
Issue: Invalid read in libgroebner.so (#2822): No solution
yet, vari
On 8 avr, 21:25, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have added a benchmark link with Fermat gcd tests, giac seems 5 to
> > 10 * faster than maxima. I don't have magma, it is most probably
>
> > another factor of 10 * faster.
>
> I think that comparison with Magma is a little optimi
On Apr 9, 8:03 am, "Minh Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
Hi Minh,
> > I generally do not build the documentation in a release cycle until
> > were are getting close to the final release. This is mostly due to
> > sage.math not having all the needed bits in the LaTeX toolcha
33 matches
Mail list logo
