>>> What is a problem with it and
>>> how should it be fixed, or rewritten from scratch?
>
> I did a little work on rewriting it from scratch, but using
> pyprocessing:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3765
>
> The above is just done by adding a couple of lines to setup.py, so
> it's
Hi all,
This is a reminder that Sage Days 11 is fast approaching! The topic is
"Special functions and computational number theory meet scientific
computing." The plan is to bring together a bunch of number theorists
and scientific computing/supercomputing experts, and Austin's
incredible supercom
On Sep 21, 2008, at 17:36 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, Justin Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Below is the output from the failure of lisp.py. Make sense to
>> anyone?
> Ok, the above seems to fail due to "memory" vs.
On Sep 21, 5:41 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:44 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What is a problem with it and
> >> how should it be fixed, or rewritten from scratch?
>
> I did a little work on rewriting it from scratch, but using
> p
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:44 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 21, 4:38 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed:
>>
>> > #4124: Robert Miller: disable pbuild [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
>>
>> But there was no explanation in the ticket, nor in th
On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, Justin Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
> > identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
> > publicly announced s
[Due to three security critical notebook bugs it is *highly*
recommended that you upgrade from all previous versions of Sage.
Binaries for all platforms are available at sagemath.org. The mirrors
are hopefully catching up soon.]
Hello folks,
Sage 3.1.2 was released on September 19th, 2008. It is
On Sep 21, 4:38 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed:
>
> > #4124: Robert Miller: disable pbuild [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
>
> But there was no explanation in the ticket, nor in the patch.
Well, it has been broken for a couple releases and people have been
hitt
Hi,
I noticed:
> #4124: Robert Miller: disable pbuild [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
But there was no explanation in the ticket, nor in the patch.
So pbuild is not going to work anymore? What is a problem with it and
how should it be fixed, or rewritten from scratch?
Thanks,
Ondrej
--~--~
On Sep 21, 2008, at 02:23 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 20, 8:43 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 2008, at 13:31 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>> I will try the "-j1" version and report back next week :-}
>
> Thanks.
Built OK on my 8-core Mac Pro. I ran tests with "-j6",
Hi John,
On 21 Sep., 21:16, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The long test in ell_finite_field.py which causes problems on this
> platform is this:
> sage: E = EllipticCurve('389a')
> sage: for p in prime_range(1): #long time (~20s)
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Georg S. Weber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Intel MacBook OS X 10.4 / Xcode 2.5 (yes, I upgraded), nothing
> really new for 3.1.3.alpha0:
>
> builds fine
>
> make test choked on two of three runs on /modular/abvar/homspace.py,
> and passed on the third
>
> ma
The long test in ell_finite_field.py which causes problems on this
platform is this:
sage: E = EllipticCurve('389a')
sage: for p in prime_range(1): #long time (~20s)
... if p != 389:
... G=E.change_ring(GF(p)).abelian_g
On Intel MacBook OS X 10.4 / Xcode 2.5 (yes, I upgraded), nothing
really new for 3.1.3.alpha0:
builds fine
make test choked on two of three runs on /modular/abvar/homspace.py,
and passed on the third
make testlong choked on sr.py and ell_finite_field.py (the known ones
from the 3.1.2 cycle)
T
On Sep 21, 10:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Tim Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All of the dependencies for Sage are in Debian unstable, though some
> > of them will not be in Lenny. The sagemath package isn't entering
> > unstable
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Tim Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All of the dependencies for Sage are in Debian unstable, though some
> of them will not be in Lenny. The sagemath package isn't entering
> unstable because it hasn't been reviewed for copyright problems. At
> this point,
All of the dependencies for Sage are in Debian unstable, though some
of them will not be in Lenny. The sagemath package isn't entering
unstable because it hasn't been reviewed for copyright problems. At
this point, it is my guess that the sagemath package will sit in
review delay until Lenny goe
Also there seems to be two blocker bugs...
package zodb for python 2.25 (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472392
(mantainer refuses until zodb3.8 is uploaded...)
linbox
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480092
(this one is fixed by version 1.1.6~rc0-2, mail by Ti
I tried to build the documentation but I get this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc$ make tut
TEXINPUTS=/home/cristian/sage/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc-main/commontex:
python /home/cristian/sage/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc-main/tools/mkhowto --
html --about html/stdabout.dat --iconserver ../
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 21, 2:07 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
>> > It is slowly trickling down and I am not sure if the Sage library
>> > itself made it into Lenny. Nearly all of that work has been
On Sep 21, 2:07 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
> > It is slowly trickling down and I am not sure if the Sage library
> > itself made it into Lenny. Nearly all of that work has been done by
> > Timothy Abbott who has been pretty busy this summer with other things
>
On Sep 20, 8:43 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2008, at 13:31 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 20, 11:12 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
>
> >> Although I was able to build 3.1.2 on a (32-bit) 10.5 system, I can't
> >> buil
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 20, 6:33 pm, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
>> I just want to ask about the status of the effort to get sagemath into Debian
>> I think this should be a goal of highest priority f
23 matches
Mail list logo
