a
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:04 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 3:46 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
>> but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
>
> The Numpy FFT
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Gabriel Gellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:12:18PM -0400, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>> >
>> > David Joyner wrote:
>> > > (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:12:18PM -0400, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> >
> > David Joyner wrote:
> > > (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
> > > but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
> > (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
> > but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
>
>
> The current CDF and RDF vectors implement fft using GSL. I'm in the
David Joyner wrote:
> (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
> but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
The current CDF and RDF vectors implement fft using GSL. I'm in the
process of switching the RDF/CDF vector backend to numpy, and then the
fft
On Oct 25, 4:51 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, but this is strange. I changed the PATH to something stupid.
> Then the make of course failed. Then I changed it back to the
> original. Now make worked fine. Huh???
The check is only done in prereq once, i.e. once you pass
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2008, at 16:01 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>>
>> The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
>>
>> new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sagestuff/sage-3.2.alpha0 wdj$ make
>> cd spkg && ./insta
On Oct 25, 3:46 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> (1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
> but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
The Numpy FFT is fairly quick and AFAIK we only build a subset of the
possible libraries there. Th
(1) Sage also does FFT via the GSL. I guess they didn't try that,
but I would imaginge they would be fast since they are in C.
(2) I'm not sure what a toolbox actually *is*. Something like an
optional package with a nice gui interface?
(3) Related to this thread, I just got an email from Cesar (
