Hi Nicolas,
A long time ago I made a FractionFIeld implementation which would
cache factorizations of denominators. instead of taking gcd's all the
time
http://markmail.org/message/7hxox5cbz5knxjse#query:new%20implementation%20of%20fraction%20field+page:1+mid:5bf3l37bsim34m4g+state:results
It
Michel michel.vandenbe...@uhasselt.be writes:
Hi Nicolas,
A long time ago I made a FractionFIeld implementation which would
cache factorizations of denominators. instead of taking gcd's all the
time
I think that the problem is that Magma uses $1 for more than one
distinct variable name. Strange but true! So when you changed them
all to x you see funny expressions like 1/x^2*x^2. Probably one of
the x's is a y.
Here is how to get readable output in Magma:
_X,Y:=Parent(Basis(D)[1]);
On Mar 9, 3:04 am, davidp dav...@reed.edu wrote:
and I have a student that would love to work with me this summer to
really polish it up. (A preliminary version of a sandpile applet he
wrote is atwww.reed.edu/~headb/sandpiles.) It might not be what
Google is looking for, though.
There
Based upon a lot of the comments in recent weeks, improvements
in plotting is a good idea. I recommend a canvas matplotlib
back end. This would greatly benefit the notebook and would
benefit the matplotlib project as well.
Of course, I'd prefer improvements to pynac based integration,
limits,
On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
... but I think the canvas back end has a
decent chance of being funded.
Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
proposal for Sage as a mentor group. Therefore it should focus on such
tasks that have no maths
Hi, thx, but the correct URL is http://sagenb.org/home/pub/298/
H
On Mar 8, 10:37 pm, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
Dear readers of this group, I wrote a simple sagelet which describes
approximation of a function in two variabels using differential. The
sagelet is published
Dear all,
I am not sure if this bug was introduced after version 3.2., but I
previously only noticed something similar when using pylab for
plotting. If I type the following code in a notebook in sage 3.3, I
get a plot where the top including the y-axis label is cut off.
a1 = 420.35
a2 = 170.35
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
... but I think the canvas back end has a
decent chance of being funded.
Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
proposal for Sage as a mentor group. Therefore it should focus on such
Hello Y'all,
What's the best way of listing all polynomials of a given degree with
coefficients in a finite field?
Thank you!
NS
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 9-Mar-09, at 8:48 AM, Noel wrote:
Hello Y'all,
What's the best way of listing all polynomials of a given degree with
coefficients in a finite field?
If you want a one liner, you could use
sage: [ GF(3)['x'](list(t)) for t in (GF(3)^2) ]
[0, 1, 2, x, x + 1, x + 2, 2*x, 2*x + 1, 2*x +
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Based upon a lot of the comments in recent weeks, improvements
in plotting is a good idea. I recommend a canvas matplotlib
back end. This would greatly benefit the notebook and would
benefit the matplotlib project as well.
On Mar 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
On 03/08/09 19:19, William Stein wrote:
3D interactivity. Here are a few simple examples from Ondrej's site
that I made from some mlab examples:
http://nb.hpfem.org/home/pub/16
Awesome!!
Thanks, yes, the sage notebook is
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mar 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
On 03/08/09 19:19, William Stein wrote:
3D interactivity. Here are a few simple examples from Ondrej's site
that I made from some mlab examples:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
... but I think the canvas back end has a
decent chance of being funded.
Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
proposal for Sage as a
On Mar 9, 6:38 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9-Mar-09, at 8:48 AM, Noel wrote:
Hello Y'all,
What's the best way of listing all polynomials of a given degree with
coefficients in a finite field?
If you want a one liner, you could use
sage: [ GF(3)['x'](list(t))
On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mar 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
On 03/08/09 19:19, William Stein wrote:
3D interactivity. Here are a few simple examples from
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:38:44AM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 9-Mar-09, at 8:48 AM, Noel wrote:
What's the best way of listing all polynomials of a given degree with
coefficients in a finite field?
If you want a one liner, you could use
sage: [ GF(3)['x'](list(t)) for t in
On 9 Mar, 18:05, YannLC yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 6:38 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9-Mar-09, at 8:48 AM, Noel wrote:
Hello Y'all,
What's the best way of listing all polynomials of a given degree with
coefficients in a finite field?
If
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mar 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
On 03/08/09
I built and tested 3.4.rc1 on three machines; No problems on 32-bit
ubuntu or 32-bit Suse, but on 64-bit Suse I get failures in devel/sage/
sage/interfaces/sage0.py as I did before (3.4.rc0).
Is it possible that some tests in there are timing out -- the machine
is heavily loaded (5 separate
On 03/09/09 23:11, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Way back when I started working on the 3d stuff, this is what I
imagined people would do. Unfortunately, x3d viewers aren't common
(meaning not commonly installed, they are easy to get) and using an
applet to install and/or view them was
Dear Michel,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:03:34AM -0700, Michel wrote:
A long time ago I made a FractionFIeld implementation which would
cache factorizations of denominators. instead of taking gcd's all the
time
Hi,
On 9 Mrz., 19:27, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I built and tested 3.4.rc1 on three machines; No problems on 32-bit
ubuntu or 32-bit Suse, but on 64-bit Suse I get failures in devel/sage/
sage/interfaces/sage0.py as I did before (3.4.rc0).
Is it possible that some tests in
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
Let me dream a bit. I very much like the idea of Factored(Ring), where
elements are kept in factored form as long as possible, as is done in
FriCas (thanks Martin for the pointer). I would like to have several
variants to choose from:
-
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:07:42PM +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
Let me dream a bit. I very much like the idea of Factored(Ring), where
elements are kept in factored form as long as possible, as is done in
FriCas (thanks Martin for the
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
actually, this would be my dream, too! (I think I proposed something
like this on fricas-devel already, but I don't remember well.)
:-) Please provide a pointer if you find back your e-mail.
sorry, very unlikely :-(
But perhaps you
On that basis I might download 3.3 sources and go for a build if I
encounter any consequences of removing the lib.
Otherwise I'll wait for a binary release.
Cheers,
Simon
On Mar 7, 7:43 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 6, 11:29 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
On 9 Mrz., 19:27, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I built and tested 3.4.rc1 on three machines; No problems on 32-bit
ubuntu or 32-bit Suse, but on 64-bit Suse I get failures in devel/sage/
sage/interfaces/sage0.py as I did before (3.4.rc0).
Is it
Thank you all for your replies! Now I have another problem:
sage: for f in list(GF(2)['x'].polynomials(of_degree=2)):
: print len(prime_divisors(f)), f
:
1 x^2
1 x^2 + 1
2 x^2 + x
1 x^2 + x + 1
Only one of these polynomials should have a 1 in the first column (the
polynomial
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Noel noel.sagu...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you all for your replies! Now I have another problem:
sage: for f in list(GF(2)['x'].polynomials(of_degree=2)):
: print len(prime_divisors(f)), f
:
1 x^2
1 x^2 + 1
2 x^2 + x
1 x^2 + x + 1
Only one of
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Noel noel.sagu...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you all for your replies! Now I have another problem:
sage: for f in list(GF(2)['x'].polynomials(of_degree=2)):
: print len(prime_divisors(f)), f
:
1 x^2
1 x^2 + 1
2 x^2 + x
1 x^2 + x + 1
Only one of
John Hunter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com
mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Is matplotlib planning on applying to be a mentoring organization for
Google Summer of Code? If so, may I suggest that an html5/canvas
backend (with
Thank you...I'm wrong. Yes, prime_divisors gives the number of
distinct prime divisors (just like the name says).
NS
On Mar 9, 4:24 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Noel noel.sagu...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you all for your replies! Now I have
Hi,
I got the following email from UT Austin. If anybody wants to go to
UT to give a Sage Tutorial May 21-22 and get all their travel
expenses paid, email me. I'm not doing it, in part because That's
during Sage Days 15 in Seattle.
'TACC organizes a yearly event called scientific software
William corrected my mistake. The code was working correctly. I
wanted the number of distinct prime divisors of each f. That's
exactly what the code was giving me.
Thank you for replying!
NS
On Mar 9, 4:29 pm, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Noel
Can I suggest moving this discussion to sage-nt?
Cheers,
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
2009/3/9 David Kohel drko...@gmail.com:
Can I suggest moving this discussion to sage-nt?
Done.
John
Cheers,
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
It seems like specifying a function for plotting or differentiation is
a common point of confusion. For example, see these threads (and I
know there have been others):
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_frm/thread/
ffc9885afb72aa89/202abaf2135d8586?lnk=gstq=dean+moore
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
... but I think the canvas back end has a
decent chance of being funded.
Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a
Maybe http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node9.html must be changed a
little with version 3.4?
Ralf
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.de wrote:
Maybe http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node9.html must be changed a
little with version 3.4?
Yes. See
42 matches
Mail list logo
