On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:07 AM, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> William,
>
> I'd be happy to, but I'm not sure how to referee an spkg. Should I
> just go ahead & give it a positive review since it works for me?
No. You have to look inside the spkg with
tar jxvf foo.spkg
and actually to see what the
William Stein wrote:
>> Also, I've been thinking about how to add Rado's graph editor, an equation
>> editor, and other nice input methods to the code cells. Basically, I'm
>> looking at how to replace a small section of Sage code with a "widget" that
>> represents the code nicely, all inside of
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
> 2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
>> 2009/7/1 William Stein :
>>> Per
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
> 2009/7/1 William Stein :
>> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 at 07:58PM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
> > Viewing this page with firefox 3.5 worked for me on ubuntu 9.04
>
> Are you using TeX fonts or image fonts? (click on the jsmath icon to
> see which you are using).
>
> The mess-up happens when using TeX fonts.
Hrm, okay, I tried aga
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> 2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
2009/7/1 William Stein :
> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
> focus in Sage more on
Rado and Bill,
Thanks for the responses!
The tutorial Bill linked to points to a tutorial for interactive use,
and includes a nice demo of Breakout:
http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/index.html
Rob
On Jul 1, 4:07 pm, Rado wrote:
> Yep, processing.js is just a parser to turn the proce
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
>>> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
>>> replaced wit
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 at 01:21AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
>> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
>> replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc
David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
>> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
>> replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc.
I spent some time today building on Ondrej's nice examples. A few
lessons learned the hard way for those who come along later.
1) Rather than uploading largish videos to my website, I tried to
experiment locally (ie loading web pages off my hard disk into my web
browser). Bad idea - the videos
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> 2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
>>> 2009/7/1 William Stein :
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma
Bill Hart wrote:
> I am sure I saw this 20 tests failed thing somewhere else. I could
> have sworn it was reported to the GMP list, but now I simply can't
> find it. Perhaps your googling skills will be better than mine. I've
> no idea whether the problem had a workaround.
>
> Bill.
If it was r
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Solaris does *not* ship with any GNU version of the 'cp' command. I
>>> don't see why they should be needed, so I've made no attempt to build
>>> them. Hence when something failed to find the flint library, I trace
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 at 01:21AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
> replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc.
> I'm curious if o
William,
I'd be happy to, but I'm not sure how to referee an spkg. Should I
just go ahead & give it a positive review since it works for me?
john
On Jul 1, 6:10 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:55 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> > I also encountered this, and the problem is
I am sure I saw this 20 tests failed thing somewhere else. I could
have sworn it was reported to the GMP list, but now I simply can't
find it. Perhaps your googling skills will be better than mine. I've
no idea whether the problem had a workaround.
Bill.
On 1 July, 04:55, "Dr. David Kirkby" wro
Thanks for the detailed response.
I think it is definitely a great goal to rely less on the GNU tools if
there are perfectly good native ones.
Your comment on the Sun compiler giving better performance is an
interesting one. I have to admit that despite building MPIR on Solaris
using Sun CC, eve
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> 2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
>>
>> 2009/7/1 William Stein :
>>> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
>>> focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
>>> (e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) r
Me too. On Ubuntu 9.10 alpha, today's Firefox 3.5 release.
Worked fine with no changes (using jsmath image fonts) but
broke when I installed the jsmath from Synaptic.
On Jul 1, 4:22 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
> On 1-Jul-09, at 04:21 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Firefox 3.5 is now officially
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt :
>
> 2009/7/1 William Stein :
>> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
>> focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
>> (e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
>> least for the time being.
2009/7/1 William Stein :
> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
> focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
> (e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
> least for the time being. I don't have a problem with that
>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Solaris does *not* ship with any GNU version of the 'cp' command. I
>> don't see why they should be needed, so I've made no attempt to build
>> them. Hence when something failed to find the flint library, I traced it
>> to the use of the '-
Yep, processing.js is just a parser to turn the processing java code
into javascript. At the end of the day its all executred through HTML
canvas (thats why it wont run in IE). Its was just easier for me to
write the java code than the javascript code because of the OOP.
On Jun 30, 9:27 pm, Wi
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
> [...]
>> Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
>> is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
>> ago, or (2) we'll get ripped off b
On 1 Jul 2009, at 16:52, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>>
>> On a somewhat related, highly speculative note: It should be
>> possible
>> to convert the worksheet into a free-form workspace. The classic
>> one-column setup works well, but different
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
> is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
> ago, or (2) we'll get ripped off by the Ma's. The build system
> doesn't fall into either cate
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotn wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
>> focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
>> (e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
>>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Stein wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low o
William Stein wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
> focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
> (e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
> least for the time being.I don't have a problem with that
> pers
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>> I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
>>> got the *most* "no" votes from the 30
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> The best conclusion I can draw from all this is that for now at least
>> I'm going to focus on symbolic/algebraic computation, and let
>> Enthought continue to do a great job building the Python numerical
>> stack.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> Tim Lahey wrote:
>> I ran across this package,
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/ruffus/
>>
>> That provides for support for computational
>> pipelines in Python. It has some nice features
>> for support of a task pipeline and visualization
>> o
William Stein wrote:
>
> The best conclusion I can draw from all this is that for now at least
> I'm going to focus on symbolic/algebraic computation, and let
> Enthought continue to do a great job building the Python numerical
> stack.
I think that the survey results are at least in part a reflec
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> Bill Hart wrote:
>> I'm confused about something. Don't we already have a Solaris port?
Michael Abshoff got Sage to build and pass the entire test suite on
one specific Solaris Sparc box using a custom toolchain including a
custom top, c
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>> Perhaps this facility exists. If not, do others thinks it would be worth
>> adding?
>>
>
> Yep, this is very handy -- and indeed already exists. Try sage -f -m
> foo.spkg. (I have no idea what "m" stands for ... maybe William does?)
It used
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
>> got the *most* "no" votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
>> only with Networkx), accord
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> one of the rule for getting code into Sage is 100% doctesting --- what
>>> does it mean exactly?
>>> At lea
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> I sort of doubt that most people would make their decisions on what
> tools to learn based on licenses, or at least I hope that's the case.
To be precise: amongst open source tools. I do use licenses as a
criterion: if choosing between a p
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
> got the *most* "no" votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
> only with Networkx), according to the table here:
>
> http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the rule for getting code into Sage is 100% doctesting --- what
>> does it mean exactly?
>> At least one doctest per function/method?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Is there some
> Perhaps this facility exists. If not, do others thinks it would be worth
> adding?
>
Yep, this is very handy -- and indeed already exists. Try sage -f -m
foo.spkg. (I have no idea what "m" stands for ... maybe William does?)
This will leave everything in $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/build after building the
John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 1, 5:21 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>> Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
>> config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
>> deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea, as it conserves disk
Bill Hart wrote:
> I'm confused about something. Don't we already have a Solaris port? Or
> am I just confused with the OSX port?
Hi Bill,
this is current view of the situation on Solaris SPARC - I don't know
about x86/x64. Time permitting, I will look at x64 later.
There is a port of Sage to
Tim Lahey wrote:
> I ran across this package,
>
> http://code.google.com/p/ruffus/
>
> That provides for support for computational
> pipelines in Python. It has some nice features
> for support of a task pipeline and visualization
> of the pipeline using Graphviz.
On a somewhat related, highly
I'm confused about something. Don't we already have a Solaris port? Or
am I just confused with the OSX port?
I realise that there are some extra special issues with the T2 because
the box came with very little in the way of toolchain.
Am I right in saying you are porting to the Solaris toolchain
On Jul 1, 5:21 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
> config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
> deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea, as it conserves disk
> space.
>
> But sometimes it is
> Both the Frobby-Cython interface to be created,
>
The Frobby spkg in Sage is command line-based, but I should point out
that the Frobby Cython interface is on trac currently, at
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6416, just waiting for a review.
Cheers
Bjarke
--~--~-~--~~
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to b
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
> replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc.
> I'm curious if other pe
I have the same problem under Scientific Linux 5.3 (based on RedHat).
My macbook keeps displaying the fonts correctly.
If the problem is firefox 3.5, as it includes the option of using
downloadable fonts, couldn't the problem be solved by allowing jsmath
to directly provide the right fonts?
Chee
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>> Since -a is the same as -dpR, you might also want to use at least -r
>>>
>>> http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?cp
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>> Thank you J
Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea, as it conserves disk
space.
But sometimes it is a pain. For example, I get a problem with mpfr. It
cou
Note that there was already a Python+Sage talk at a recent SIAM conference
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2008/07/python-tools-for-science-go-to-siam.html
http://www.ams.org/ams/siam-2008.html#python
which was apparently very popular. It may be that those who attended the SIAM
conference and who are
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
>>
>> I don't know if I should interpret this as:
>
> my interpretation is, that people simply want to learn more ab
On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
> http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
>
> I don't know if I should interpret this as:
my interpretation is, that people simply want to learn more about
those tools which they already know about. sage isn't part of
On 1-Jul-09, at 04:21 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is
> broken
> in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
> replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters,
> etc.
> I'm curious if other p
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:55 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> I also encountered this, and the problem is actually GCC 4.4, which
> comes with Fedora 11. See
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6362
>
> I installed the spkg from that page and built Sage flawlessly; I
> suspect it would fix
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Do Mac systems have /usr/include/X11? the bsd.math has it. If generaly
>>> not, then I still need to tweak the configur
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> I noticed a problem when building 'sage-4.1.alpha2.spkg'. It complains
>
> ld: fatal:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>> The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
>>> would like to both announce the plan for
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
>> would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
>> feedback from everyone on topics of i
Trac seems to be working for me, but if I choose:
{6} All Tickets By Milestone (Including closed)
"Report execution failed: column "modified" does not exist LINE 16:
(CASE status WHEN 'closed' THEN modified ELSE (-1)*p... ^
I don't know if this is a new issue or not.
--~--~-~--~~
Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc.
I'm curious if other people are seeing this. I've corresponded with
Davide abo
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
> would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
> feedback from everyone on topics of interest.
rather than rehash much here, where it's not easy to p
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 at 12:00PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Jun 30, 7:49 am, John H Palmieri wrote:
> > It would be nice to see timings on other systems.
>
> 64-bit Kubuntu 9.04 on dual-core Intel, reasonably new, but not
> extravagant hardware.
>
> 4.1.alpha2:
> sage: time s = search_src('matr
66 matches
Mail list logo
