On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:18:14PM +0100, Frank Lübeck wrote:
I will try to find someone taking over my lectures. (Maybe I have to leave
earlier.)
That would be great! Looking forward meeting you there.
Starting Sunday doesn't look like an option considering the poll.
But if I had a place to
Minh,
In a few days that I was here, you were one of the most helpful guys,
together with William Stein, David Joyner and Mike Hansen, as well as
Jaap Spies himself. I guess that Jaap, William, and David can't have
this award, and Mike had it last year. That seems to be a rather
simple choice for
Hi folks,
A binary of Sage 4.3.4 for SPARC Solaris 10 on the machine t2.math is
available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.3.4/sage-4.3.4-t2.math.washington.edu-sun4v-SunOS.tar.gz
Here is a summary of how I produced that binary.
(1) I logged into t2.math, took the source
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
A binary of Sage 4.3.4 for SPARC Solaris 10 on the machine t2.math is
available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.3.4/sage-4.3.4-t2.math.washington.edu-sun4v-SunOS.tar.gz
Here is a summary of how I produced that binary.
(1) I logged into
Hi,
On a positive note. I was able to build Sage 4.3.4 and run long tests
(all passed) on:
1. x86 - Scientific Linux 5.1
2. AMD64 - Ubuntu 10.4 (beta 1)
Adam
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Martin Albrecht
m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
I wrote the small finite field class and added the int_repr() and forgot to
add something equivalent for bigger fields. I would suggest to add a new
function to both called integer_representation()
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:14 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
After much discussion, a secret committee has made the following
announcement:
-
Minh Van Nguyen is an integral part of the Sage development effort.
He is awarded the
Hi Nathann,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Well, here is my problem... If you have some idea to tackle it... :-)
I just want to say that what you are doing is rather novel at least to
me. Is it possible to draw some inspiration from the
Hi Burcin,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
SNIP
- replace the GSoC 2010 link on the front page of the web site with
a Help Wanted or Get Involved! link.
I have renamed the link GSoC 2010 to Get Involved!. This new link
still points to the wiki page
This is the same document I sent before but with right format.
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dsvkx4j_8dz2gzrdx
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
Hi Yuri,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:54 PM, YURi KARADZhOV
yuri.karadz...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I'm interested in participating in Sage 2010 GSoC project.
I regret to say that Sage has not been accepted as a mentoring
organization for GSoC 2010. Burcin informed us of this at this
sage-devel
I played around with sage and found some problems with desolve command.
To solve ode diff(y(x),x)+a*y(x)+b*x+c we should first define variables and
functions
x = var('x')
a,b,c=var('a b c')
y=function('y',x)
eq=diff(y,x)+a*y+b*x+c
but than unless it is obvious that the dependent variable is x
Hi all,
scipy is not compiled in that build, despite it being a standard package.
It just won't build by default on Solaris (while it builds there if I do
sage -f scipy-0.7.p4.spkg, etc).
This is not only the issue with this build by Minh,
but I also see this when I build sage myself on t2.
so .so files are missing in that build:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/ff2964972f59429a
On Mar 22, 3:06 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
A binary of Sage 4.3.4 for SPARC Solaris 10 on the machine t2.math is
actually, sage: standard_packages()
says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2
build of sage-4.3.4 I made.
['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus',
'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pil-1.1.6.p2',
'polytopes_db-20100210', 'sagetex-2.2.3.p0', 'scipy-0.7.p4',
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
actually, sage: standard_packages()
says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2
build of sage-4.3.4 I made.
['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus',
'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pil-1.1.6.p2',
'polytopes_db-20100210',
Well done, Minh!
By the way, as this is a Spies price, so you can call yourself a
Master Spy!
(on the second thought, in one of languages I know spies means
kebab... :-))
(Jaap, neemt je mij niet kwalijk, AJB :-))
Best,
Dima
On Mar 22, 2:14 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I run 'standard_packages()' for version 4.3.4.rc0 where all doctests passed
(including the long ones). I find however 4 standard packages are uninstalled.
drkir...@redstart:~/sage-4.3.4.rc0$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.4.rc0,
Hi Yuri,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:58 AM, yuri.k yuri.karadz...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately I have not enough resources to pay significant attention
to sage (despite I really want to). At least I can solve first problem
with desolve, but I still need some help to understand how to select
William was keen that a new release was made quickly to fix the issues which
prevent 4.3.4 building on several linux distros.
A patch is here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567
If that is added, Sage should build ok on these linux distros, which otherwise
do not like it when
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William was keen that a new release was made quickly to fix the issues
which prevent 4.3.4 building on several linux distros.
A patch is here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567
If that is added, Sage should build ok on these linux distros, which
otherwise
This is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567 . You can fix
the problem by replacing the gd spkg with the one found here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iconv/iconv-1.13.1.p0.spkg
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
Thank you Mike,
that was probably the fastest answer ever!!
however, I'm sorry for the post, I should have looked if it was
reported before,
Georg
On Mar 22, 9:32 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
This ishttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567. You can fix
the problem by
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:36 PM, ggrafendorfer
georg.grafendor...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Mike,
that was probably the fastest answer ever!!
however, I'm sorry for the post, I should have looked if it was
reported before,
No worries :-)
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Mar 22, 1:32 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
This is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567. You can fix
the problem by replacing the gd spkg with the one found here:
You mean the *iconv* spkg.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iconv/iconv-1.13.1.p0.spkg
--
Thank you for reporting this.
I think Robert Marik is the best person to reply to this
issue. I guess he is busy now but I hope he will reply in a
fairly soon and give his opinion.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM, YURi KARADZhOV
yuri.karadz...@gmail.com wrote:
I played around with sage and
2010/3/22 YURi KARADZhOV yuri.karadz...@gmail.com:
I played around with sage and found some problems with desolve command.
To solve ode diff(y(x),x)+a*y(x)+b*x+c we should first define variables and
functions
x = var('x')
a,b,c=var('a b c')
y=function('y',x)
eq=diff(y,x)+a*y+b*x+c
Hi!
Here are three little algebracategories patches on trac to review:
- #8576: Categories for QQ, CC, RR and friends
- #8562: Categories for IntegerMod rings
- #8579: Add the categories of magmas and additive magmas
They are good picks if you want to get into the category business.
Hi!
By lack of decision for the moment, I postponed the change to a later
ticket, I just uploaded on trac a minimal version of my patch which
just lets IntegerModRing use its categories, without upgrading its
category to Fields(): see
Burcin--
Now that I've managed to divide the discussion between two groups, I
should try to help organize the mess I made.
Ondrej mentioned in the sage-support discussion that he's opened
ticket 8564. Unfortunately I don't understand the plumbing well
enough to know if 8564 and 8565 are
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:58:59PM -0700, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
Dan Bump recently raised the issue that the `lattice` method for Weyl
groups is badly named. I agree, but the issue is more general. Hence,
here is a call for good names.
Let P be a parent endowed with a natural action (or
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 at 04:44PM -0700, Rado wrote:
Thanks to Kevin (one of William's undergrad students), we have some
major improvements to the graph editor. Take it for spin at
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/js-graph-editor/ (a Sage patch will
follow soon). I have only tested it in Firefox
I don't see why libiconv is needed on Cygwin.
One can install libiconv on Cygwin system-wide, using the Cygwin
installer.
On Mar 22, 5:50 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi There,
Thanks to David, the issues #8567 Change iconv so it builds on Cygwin and
Solaris
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Congrats Minh, thanks for all your persistence hard work!
Congrats!
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:47 PM, G B g.c.b.at.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Burcin--
Now that I've managed to divide the discussion between two groups, I
should try to help organize the mess I made.
Ondrej mentioned in the sage-support discussion that he's opened
ticket 8564. Unfortunately I don't
35 matches
Mail list logo
