Hello, Florent !
Being the first time I organize such an event, I can't answer all your
questions. However, here are some information:
- There is only one day available, which is September 1st, for this
Sage Day (not official, I know, but I can still call it that way!). We
have the whole day.
Hi Carl!
On 6 Aug., 04:18, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
I think it is easier to do
from sage.all import ZZ
instead of providing its exact location (from sage.rings.integer...).
Moreover, using sage.all
Hi!
Let s be a string (e.g., a docstring containing tests). Is it possible
to perform the analogue of sage -t on s without writing s into a
file and running a sub-process sage -t on that file?
Cheers,
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On 08/ 6/10 06:59 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
On 8/5/10, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
(%i1) asinh(1.0);
(%o1) .8813735870195429
Appears to be a consequence of the way ECL formats
floating point numbers. I can produce an example on Linux
so it's not
On 08/ 6/10 04:06 AM, Jason B Hill wrote:
Has sympow been tested on Itanium Linux much?
Itanium versions exist in the repositories for Debian (Lenny/Sid), Ubuntu
and Fedora. So, the short answer is yes.
Thank you.
If I'm not mistaken, that script will include x86 based code for the
On 08/ 6/10 05:14 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Bill Hartgoodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
The single biggest improvement in my mind would be made to MPIR. And I
know the MPIR devels would absolutely love to have them contribute.
Jason and Brian have been working
When I paste the following code into a notebook worksheet in magma
mode, I consistently get Syntax Error. When I paste the same code
directly into magma, it works properly:
{{{
_x:=PolynomialRing(Rationals());
repeat
g:=3*b*x^4+18*c*x^3-6*b^2*x^2-6*b*c*x-b^3-9*c^2 where
b:=Random([-10..10])
On 5 ago, 04:31, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT), cousteau
cousteaulecommand...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Simon in that developers may be reluctant to modify the
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
In addition, upstream reports that upgrading to 4.5 is currently broken
My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
2008-07-11).
Right. One of the points we have drive home to the users is that if
they
On 08/ 6/10 11:00 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
2008-07-11).
If anyone has the time,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:00:19 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi
raju.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Users do not want to install the latest version without knowing if
their problem is fixed in the latest version. But if they know that
the problem is fixed, then they make every effort to get that
* a function that plots the Bode diagram. Once it's possible to (1)
draw logarithmic axes, (2) align plots on a graphic array so that both
horizontal axes scales match perfectly, and maybe (3) select the
divisions on the axes (it would be nicer to have divisions each 15 or
45 degrees than
On 08/06/2010 04:41 AM, Simon King wrote:
Let s be a string (e.g., a docstring containing tests). Is it possible
to perform the analogue of sage -t on s without writing s into a
file and running a sub-process sage -t on that file?
We're in the *very* early stages of developing a new doctesting
14 matches
Mail list logo
