On 1/29/11 2:13 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Following your suggestions I uploaded a new patch which addresses the
issues of representation and latex methods for spin crystals.
They now have a new method _repr_ using the signature
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:21:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
How quickly could you get the graphs_color_by_label-nt.patch polished and
merged?
In principle, it should be just an hour or two of work. So it's all
about prioritizing it with the rest of the backlog. In other words:
adding a
On 2/1/11 4:02 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:21:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
How quickly could you get the graphs_color_by_label-nt.patch polished and
merged?
In principle, it should be just an hour or two of work. So it's all
about prioritizing it with the rest
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:31:03AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Could you open a trac ticket for it so I can refer to it?
Done: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10723
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
On 2/1/11 5:00 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:31:03AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Could you open a trac ticket for it so I can refer to it?
Done: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10723
Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:50:53AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat queue?
I think the answer is yes, since moving it in the series file to before
the crystal patches gives an error. Which ones? Would you include them
into
On 2/1/11 8:42 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:50:53AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat queue?
I think the answer is yes, since moving it in the series file to before
the crystal patches gives an error.
On Feb 1, 3:41 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Put another way, there should be a discussion about what Sage needs, how
urgent
it is, and a plan drawn up.
I thought porting Sage to Windows via Cygwin was seen as important, as it
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 03:27, luisfe lftab...@yahoo.es wrote:
On Feb 1, 3:41 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Put another way, there should be a discussion about what Sage needs, how
urgent
it is, and a plan drawn up.
I thought
While I use Sage daily on my research I decided that I could not use sage
on my classes for freshmen students until it works on windows.
Showing your students that there is more to computing than the Xbox
ecosystem is more important than Sage or undergrad calculus or whatever your
freshman
While I use Sage daily on my research I decided that I could not use sage
on my classes for freshmen students until it works on windows.
I am curious, why is using the virtual machine image not feasable?
On new computers it should run with acceptable speed. In classroom it
should be even
On 2/1/11 2:27 AM, luisfe wrote:
I would like to introduce someone to Sage, but I'm wasting my time if she needs
to learn Linux, Solaris, or buy a Mac first. So I'm suggesting she use
Mathematica on Windows. As much as I don't like that idea, I don't feel able to
recommend Sage. If there was a
On 02/ 1/11 08:50 AM, David Roe wrote:
I think most people agree that a Windows port is important.
But there's no plan for Sage, which sets out priorities and reasonable estimates
of time.
But it still
hasn't happened. My impression is that the reasons for that are primarily
that it's
1)
On 2/1/11 8:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
We should also have status reports. See for example some of the archived
FreeBSD status reports.
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2009-04-2009-09.html
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2008-10-2008-12.html
Hi Volker,
On Feb 1, 12:15 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon a closer look at the symmetrica spkg I noticed a lot of other oddities.
Particularly ironic is the fact that the binary that fails to link on your
machine is actually not used. I've updated my spkg
Delete any cached symmetrica spkg from
$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/optional/symmetrica*.spkg if it exists and then
sage -f http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I don't know how hard it is, but I got the impression from William only a
few months back that it did not need a lot of work. But I've come very
suspicious about time estimates from many Sage developers.
I don't
On Jan 31, 4:26 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/29/11 9:52 AM, rjf wrote:
Even assuming that the junk-submitter takes no time at all from
project management on the front end, the need to review
contributions
is certainly a drain. Realizing, and then explaining
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein, for example, says
His [RJF's] experience is not based on him actually successfully
having led
any nontrivial open source software development projects. He has no
credentials at all there, as far as I know. Yet, he
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 02/ 1/11 08:50 AM, David Roe wrote:
Some of the problems seem to be firmly in the hands of people who have
written code in the Sage library, which simply does not work properly on
Cygwin. They should be able to
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
* No documented plan
* No real documented estimates of time scales
* No status reports for the project as a whole.
If you think a plan as you describe it for overall Sage
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 08:40 -0800, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
* No documented plan
* No real documented estimates of time scales
* No status reports for the project as a
Hi,
in ticket #10720 nth_root for power series is added; two bugs in sqrt
are pointed out; reviews are appreciated.
Thanks
Mario
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Georg,
Before I posted my question, I had tried an earlier build with
SAGE64=yes, but (of course) that didn't work and I received the same
error that I posted. Then I had set SAGE64=no, tried again and got
the same error. I then ran make clean and got the same error. I
even rebooted and
Dima,
It looks like it is getting set pretty early, so I'm just posting here
the beginning of the install.log, rather than the whole huge file.
But it sounds to me that somehow the problem is that make clean
leaves too much behind. For instance, it seems to want to start
building r right away,
Hi all,
Version 0.17 of mpmath is now available on the project website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.17
Mpmath is a pure-Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point
arithmetic that
OK. Your revised spkg builds and install correctly now, as far as I
can tell.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Feb 1, 8:22 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
..
Some history..
http://www.wikilivres.info/wiki/Twenty_Years_of_Berkeley_Unix:_From_A...
According to that page you were one of 14 people who co-authored a
grant..
I was the principal investigator for the grant, and wrote the
I respectfully submit that this part of the discussion should move to
sage-flame.
Incidentally, the title of the thread is very relevant to the Cygwin
port. I would say that there are *lots* of people who would like it,
but the intersection of that set and those with the relevant
(extremely
On 2/1/11 5:12 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Maybe a few of us should get together and offer a bounty...
Or write a grant!
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
This is a very interesting idea. I was too thinking about a way to
easily implement Sage interacts into webpages. I believe this could be
a very useful feature; imagine giving the viewers of your page easy
access to the full power of Sage! Not only would it be easy to
implement mathematical
Firefox, OpenOffice and FreeBSD are all successful open-source projects, but
have a documented plans with at least projected time scales. If dates are
regularly missed, then one needs to determine if they were unrealistic, and so
allow more time for future plans. IMHO, Sage lacks a real
Hi William and others,
what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
commits like:
http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/detail?r=2ebfec09070b4a9a549c2a51e8e9dcde9a832925#
I am thinking how to best store
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi William and others,
what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
commits like:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi William and others,
what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found
35 matches
Mail list logo
