[sage-devel] Re: FGb - Gröbner basis computation code

Le dimanche 8 mai 2016 04:08:54 UTC+2, john_perry_usm a écrit : > > What about homogeneous cyclic-8? I'm not sure it will be any better; I'm > just curious. > > I do know Singular is working on improving aspects of the sba() > implementation, and I'm a bit surprised it's that slow. > That's

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > You can set it yourself in the environment after moving Sage, this may work > with the aforementioned caveats about conflicts with system libraries. And > change SAGE_LOCAL/lib/sage-current-location.txt to avoid the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

Hi, I just tested this package for creating binaries. It creates by default a file sage-7.2.rc1-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 which is 593M. Doing time tar jxf sage-7.2.rc1-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 takes just under 2 minutes (for me) and results in a directory SageMath, rather than

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Monday, 2 May 2016 20:18:06 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, the test server is not completing evaluations. Just get the > spinning GIF. > Turns out I've changed some logic when fixing Chrome and Firefox got affected but not others. Now things work for me in Firefox and Chrome under

[sage-devel] Re: FGb - Gröbner basis computation code

What about homogeneous cyclic-8? I'm not sure it will be any better; I'm just curious. I do know Singular is working on improving aspects of the sba() implementation, and I'm a bit surprised it's that slow. On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 1:32:36 AM UTC-5, parisse wrote: > > > > Le samedi 7 mai

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 8:51:40 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > My use case is building Sage on SageMathCloud (Ubuntu 15.10 right now) > for people to develop on SageMathCloud (on the exact same machine). Then just put sage in the same path for everyone (with a private union mount), thats

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 5:46:20 PM UTC+2, William wrote: >> >> I read that github page, but I don't know what binary-pkg actually >> does. > > > It compiles Sage in a long directory path. > >> >> For context, I used

[sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 5:46:20 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > I read that github page, but I don't know what binary-pkg actually > does. It compiles Sage in a long directory path. > For context, I used to (1) build a copy of Sage, (2) possibly > customize it, then (3) type > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Yes, I know, I was puzzled by this some time ago too. The reason for all > this mess is that in order to make > a relocatable Sage binary (more precisely, a bunch of relocateable libs etc) > that uses rpath, it has to be

[sage-devel] Re: Building binaries...

Yes, I know, I was puzzled by this some time ago too. The reason for all this mess is that in order to make a relocatable Sage binary (more precisely, a bunch of relocateable libs etc) that uses rpath, it has to be built at a location that will allow pattern-matching on binaries to work (so it

[sage-devel] Building binaries...

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > The sage script in your PATH is outdated: > > $ ./sage -advanced | grep bdist > $ egrep -r bdist src/ > $ > > The way to build binary (relocatable) packages is > https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg, which says: > >

[sage-devel] Re: FGb - Gröbner basis computation code

Le samedi 7 mai 2016 07:30:42 UTC+2, john_perry_usm a écrit : > > I'm sorry. I got the name mixed up; the function you want to look at is > sba(), not dstd() (which is something experimental of mine that never saw > the light of day). > >