Hi Nick,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:12:54AM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
Test(obj) returns something that provides all kinds of functionality
and methods for testing said object. This can call certain _ methods
on obj.
+1 to this, -1 to lazy attributes, properties, etc.
Would
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:33:42PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
But, err, guys, are you telling *me* that you want an
attribute here
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola wrote:
I'm also in favor of _test_X to avoid cluttering up the tab
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:49:20AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:49:20AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
Test(obj) returns something that provides all kinds of functionality
and methods for testing said object. This can call certain _ methods
on obj.
+1 to this, -1 to lazy attributes, properties, etc.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
But, err, guys, are you telling *me* that you want an
attribute here
instead of a method? Or should this be:
One new attribute in tab completion is fine. A dozen, not so much. I
still like the approach below better though.
I
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
But, err, guys, are you telling *me* that you want an
attribute here
instead of a method? Or should this be:
One new attribute in tab completion
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
sage: t.asstab
But I guess I can live with that (in practice, I myself will be using
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
sage:
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M.
To ease the reviewing of the category code, and also to make it
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at
+1 from me as well.
David
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0700,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola wrote:
I'm also in favor of _test_X to avoid cluttering up the tab
completion. Another option to increase visibility would be to have a
test object, e.g.
sage: foo.test.associativity()
True
+1. I think it merges the two
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola wrote:
I'm also in favor of _test_X to avoid cluttering up the tab
completion. Another option to increase visibility would be to have a
test
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M.
To ease the reviewing of the category code, and also to make it more
generic and useful, I have extracted the test
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Hi!
To ease the reviewing of the category code, and also to make it more
generic and useful, I have extracted the test framework code out of
the categories and into SageObject.
See also:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M.
To ease the reviewing of the category code, and also to make it more
generic and useful, I have extracted the test framework code out of
the categories and into SageObject.
See
2009/6/18 Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M.
To ease the reviewing of the category code, and also to make it more
generic and useful, I have extracted the test framework code
2009/6/18 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:20 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Of related interest, there are 8 publicly visible methods on SageObject:
sage: s = SageObject()
sage: s.tab key
s.category s.db s.dump s.dumps s.rename
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:20:56PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
Of related interest, there are 8 publicly visible methods on SageObject:
sage: s = SageObject()
sage: s.tab key
s.categorys.db s.dumps.dumps s.rename
s.reset_name s.saves.version
I think I
23 matches
Mail list logo
