Le jeudi 29 mars, Keshav Kini a écrit:
> Julien Puydt writes:
> > Le jeudi 29 mars, John H Palmieri a écrit:
> >> If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the
> >> "deps" file...
> >
> > Doesn't "# hello" work?
>
> Yes - I expect that was sarcasm ;)
It somehow flew past my head
Le vendredi 30 mars, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
> On 2012-03-29, John H Palmieri wrote:
> >
> > If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the
> > "deps" file...
>
> there is a clean way to handle this: it would involve creating a
> separate "testing" dependencies graph, of which the
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:56:52 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2012-03-29, John H Palmieri wrote:
> >
> > If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the "deps"
> > file...
>
> there is a clean way to handle this: it would involve creating a separate
> "testing" depend
On 2012-03-29, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the "deps"
> file...
there is a clean way to handle this: it would involve creating a separate
"testing" dependencies graph, of which the "building" dependencies graph
will be a subgraph.
The la
Julien Puydt writes:
> Le jeudi 29 mars, John H Palmieri a écrit:
>> If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the "deps"
>> file...
>
> Doesn't "# hello" work?
Yes - I expect that was sarcasm ;)
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this grou
Le jeudi 29 mars, John H Palmieri a écrit:
> If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the "deps"
> file...
Doesn't "# hello" work?
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:00:24 AM UTC-7, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:02:45 AM UTC+8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
>>> > Simply making CVXOPT depe
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:02:45 AM UTC+8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
>> > Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib is certainly easier, but
>> > IMHO not really appropriate since t
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
> > Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib is certainly easier, but
> > IMHO not really appropriate since the former *builds* without the
> > latter.
> I don't see the problem. What's the
On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
> Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib is certainly easier, but
> IMHO not really appropriate since the former *builds* without the
> latter.
I don't see the problem. What's the harm with the easy solution?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev
On 28 Mrz., 17:08, leif wrote:
> On 28 Mrz., 12:31, "dahl.joac...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> > matplotlib is only used for some of the examples with CVXOPT; there is no
> > reason to introduce such a dependency. If it's a matter of automated
> > tests, then it would be much better to comment out t
On 28 Mrz., 12:31, "dahl.joac...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> matplotlib is only used for some of the examples with CVXOPT; there is no
> reason to introduce such a dependency. If it's a matter of automated
> tests, then it would be much better to comment out the
> plotting in the few examples.
I'd also
Le mercredi 28 mars, dahl.joac...@gmail.com a écrit:
> matplotlib is only used for some of the examples with CVXOPT; there
> is no reason to introduce such a dependency. If it's a matter of
> automated tests, then it would be much better to comment out the
> plotting in the few examples.
Both m
matplotlib is only used for some of the examples with CVXOPT; there is no
reason to introduce such a dependency. If it's a matter of automated
tests, then it would be much better to comment out the
plotting in the few examples.
Den tirsdag den 27. marts 2012 09.03.49 UTC+2 skrev Jeroen Demeye
14 matches
Mail list logo
