Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 12:38:40 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 3:10:22 PM UTC+2, Nathan Dunfield wrote: >> >> but of course the Mac Mini has only 2 cores. >> > > For the record, our OSX buildbot is a quad-core mac mini (i7-3720QM CPU @ > 2.60GHz). >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 3:10:22 PM UTC+2, Nathan Dunfield wrote: > > but of course the Mac Mini has only 2 cores. > For the record, our OSX buildbot is a quad-core mac mini (i7-3720QM CPU @ 2.60GHz). CPU-wise its actually reasonable, but the box is just too small. Fan goes crazy if you

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:25:57 AM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > And is unfortunately illegal according to Apple though I'm not a lawyer. > May or may not be legal depending on your jurisdiction. In the US its illegal according to the Psystar case. In Germany, most click-through

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

> > Plus licenses for a range of OSX versions (at least those that are >> still supported by Apple...) >> > > these are peanuts, e.g. £20 for 10.7 > I don't know if this is still the case, but as of a year ago if you become a registered Apple Developer then you got access to all the old

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:31:58 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > > (but 1st thing 1st, let's start from the current version being >>> well-supported...) >>> >> Or rather let's find someone from ODK willing to buy the hardware! >> >> (Next we could buy some sparc and itanium CPUs and Solaris

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:23 AM Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 12:13:20 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:03:11 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Dima Pasechnik

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 12:13:20 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:03:11 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Dima Pasechnik >> wrote: >> > https://www.apple.com/fr/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro >> > >> > I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:03:11 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > https://www.apple.com/fr/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro > > > > I don't see why ODK cannot spend 4600 euro to buy one of these... > > (it is way

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > https://www.apple.com/fr/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro > > I don't see why ODK cannot spend 4600 euro to buy one of these... > (it is way above my ODK budget, but would still be peanuts for the whole > project) Plus licenses for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

https://www.apple.com/fr/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro I don't see why ODK cannot spend 4600 euro to buy one of these... (it is way above my ODK budget, but would still be peanuts for the whole project) On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 10:25:57 AM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 8:29:37 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > problem is, Apple headless hardware range currently available consists of > Mac Mini's, which are very much underpowered. > > they promise something better in Dec. > > Internet is offering details on how to hack OSX to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

problem is, Apple headless hardware range currently available consists of Mac Mini's, which are very much underpowered. they promise something better in Dec. Internet is offering details on how to hack OSX to run in a VM which is not running on Apple hardware. Perhaps this is the best way

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

> > How do people get VMs for testing different OSX / XCode versions? > Both VirtualBox and VMWare (Fusion) fully support OS X VMs with the important caveat you have to use actual Apple hardware for the host. I've used both without major problems on a Mac Pro. Currently I mostly use VMWare

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 10:00:05 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Isuru Fernando > wrote: > > Here's a branch for osx with sage 7.6. > > https://github.com/isuruf/sagelib-feedstock/tree/osx3 > > Unfortunately travis-ci timeouts due to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > Here's a branch for osx with sage 7.6. > https://github.com/isuruf/sagelib-feedstock/tree/osx3 > Unfortunately travis-ci timeouts due to the build time restrictions. > conda-forge's policy has been to do it locally and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Here's a branch for osx with sage 7.6. https://github.com/ isuruf/sagelib-feedstock/tree/osx3 Unfortunately travis-ci timeouts due to the build time restrictions. conda-forge's policy has been to do it locally and upload to the anaconda channel. Since I don't have access to osx, it would be great

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:25 PM, mmarco wrote: > Does that work on all the platforms supported by anaconda, or is it linux > only? For Windows I hope to one day package Sage and its dependencies for Cygwin too (now that most of them are working). Isuru's work on this will be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Linux only. For OSX, all the dependencies are there. Once https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12426 is resolved, I can make a package for OSX as well. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:55 PM, mmarco wrote: > Does that work on all the platforms supported by anaconda, or is it linux >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Does that work on all the platforms supported by anaconda, or is it linux only? El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2017, 5:29:31 (UTC+1), Isuru Fernando escribió: > > Hi, > > Update: With the help of Erik and Julian, we now have all the runtime > dependencies of sage in conda-forge. > > There are some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Hi, Update: With the help of Erik and Julian, we now have all the runtime dependencies of sage in conda-forge. There are some more things to be done until it is ready. (like patching sagelib for https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382) You can install sage using the following commands (Downloads

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Hi, I've identified the gap issue here, https://github.com/gap-system/gap/issues/1171. So, that's working now. I've only got a few packages to go before I start testing sagelib. (sympow, maxima and giacpy_sage). Any help is appreciated. There's still the sagenb related packages and optional

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:50:08AM +0530, Isuru Fernando wrote: >Update: >All the build dependencies of sagelib except libgap is in conda-forge >now for Linux and OS X. Wow, excellent! Congratulations :-) >See [1]https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/issues/2357 for >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Update: All the build dependencies of sagelib except libgap is in conda-forge now for Linux and OS X. See https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/issues/2357 for details on what has to be done. If there are volunteers who would like to help me in maintaining these conda recipes, please let

[sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 4:27:02 AM UTC-8, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > Anybody interested in making proper conda packages for the remaining 74 > packages and sage itself? > People interested in this effort may want to look at: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21507 Task ticket: Make

[sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

Sun 2017-02-05 13:27:02 UTC+1, Isuru Fernando: > I've packaged sage 7.5.1 for conda for linux and have uploaded it to anaconda.org. > > To try it out you can do on linux with miniconda3, (Downloads about 1 GB) > > conda create -n sage sage sage-spkg-sources -c isuruf -c conda-forge > > This