[sage-devel] Re: Gentoo prefix

2010-03-27 Thread Georg S. Weber
> ... So there are two alternatives: > >  - Write spkgs for everything I use (including some stuff which > already have Gento packages, such as suitesparse) and give them Sage >  - Point them to a stripped Gento prefix bootstrap, and write Gento > packages for the (fewer) packages that are missing

[sage-devel] Re: Gentoo prefix

2010-03-27 Thread dagss
On Mar 27, 11:15 am, François Bissey wrote: > > No, I'm barely getting started. I hardly know my way around Gentoo, I > > had no interest in it until I discovered Gentoo prefix. (I need to > > distribute software on clusters, and I certainly don't have root > > access to those! -- and I'm really g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Gentoo prefix

2010-03-27 Thread François Bissey
> No, I'm barely getting started. I hardly know my way around Gentoo, I > had no interest in it until I discovered Gentoo prefix. (I need to > distribute software on clusters, and I certainly don't have root > access to those! -- and I'm really glad that the others who are on the > cluster don't ha

[sage-devel] Re: Gentoo prefix

2010-03-27 Thread dagss
On Mar 27, 10:56 am, François Bissey wrote: > > I just stumbled over "Gentoo prefix" -- have any of you tried it out? > > > In short, it allows a Gentoo "Linux" system in a subdirectory, on Linux, > > Mac, Windows/SUA, Solaris. Gentoo is thus awfully similar to the Sage > > spkg system: > > >   -