On Jan 5, 2008 5:37 AM, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I partially agree. I must admit that this is a good point.
> But now just another idea (yes I do like live cds): if Sage gets into
> Debian, making a live cd should be no problem at all!??? Or am I missing
> something?
Not really.
>
> The biggest advantage of a live cd is that it lets you experiment with
> the software without modifying anything on your system. This is great
> for marketing purposes, but pointless for everyday use. Since the
> notebook servers (sagenb.com) already provide an environment where
> people can pl
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:52:38 +0100
"Fabio Tonti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, yes I most definitely would, since I don't always have my
> Laptop with me and also work on non-Unix machines (unfortunatly).
> So I think its feasible to have a "live"-option around. But maybe the
> effort to crea
Well, yes I most definitely would, since I don't always have my Laptop with
me and also work on non-Unix machines (unfortunatly).
So I think its feasible to have a "live"-option around. But maybe the effort
to create one should just be postponed?
Now there's another thing which comes to my mind: Wo
On Jan 3, 2008 1:46 AM, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a very good idea for demonstrations... Imagine having sage on a
> USB-drive an booting it directly
Would _you_ actually use it. So far in this thread only one
person -- Tim Daly -- has said they would actually use a live
C
It's a very good idea for demonstrations... Imagine having sage on a
USB-drive an booting it directly
Cheers, Fabio
On Jan 2, 2008 8:04 PM, TimDaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd use a live cd. they are much more convenient to show off
> at conferences.
>
> On Jan 2, 1:37 am, "William St
I'd use a live cd. they are much more convenient to show off
at conferences.
On Jan 2, 1:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 1:21 PM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, 8:56 pm, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 29,
On Dec 29, 2007 1:21 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 29, 8:56 pm, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 29, 2007 3:34 AM, mabshoff
> >
> >
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Since Sage is effectively (or, rather much more effectively) using
> > > > t
On Dec 29, 8:56 pm, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 3:34 AM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since Sage is effectively (or, rather much more effectively) using
> > > the same strategy of making all of the systems available I thought
> > > it might
On Dec 29, 2007 3:34 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since Sage is effectively (or, rather much more effectively) using
> > the same strategy of making all of the systems available I thought
> > it might be worthwhile to update the document with Sage information.
> > You might conside
On Dec 29, 10:16 am, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have?
>
> >> Modified BSD.
>
> >> I'd like Sage to be in the list so people from other systems
> >> can have a clue what form they might type in Sage to get
> >> similar results.
>
> >I
>> >What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have?
>>
>> Modified BSD.
>>
>> I'd like Sage to be in the list so people from other systems
>> can have a clue what form they might type in Sage to get
>> similar results.
>
>I was wondering why the Rosetta document lists GMP as a system?
I
Hi Tim,
On Dec 29, 3:22 am, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think this is a great idea.
+1
> >What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have?
>
> Modified BSD.
>
> I'd like Sage to be in the list so people from other systems
> can have a clue what form they might type in Sage to
13 matches
Mail list logo
