John H Palmieri wrote:
On Feb 3, 11:33 pm, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
Than you for finding this error John. It's strange, I never se this on
Solaris myself, though William says he has seen it before on Linux.
IHopefully, this bug can be squashed, though it is not as serious as
the one which is stop
On 5 Feb, 04:07, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Feb 3, 11:33 pm, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> > Than you for finding this error John. It's strange, I never se this on
> > Solaris myself, though William says he has seen it before on Linux.
> > IHopefully, this bug can be squashed, though it is no
On Feb 3, 11:33 pm, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>
> Than you for finding this error John. It's strange, I never se this on
> Solaris myself, though William says he has seen it before on Linux.
> IHopefully, this bug can be squashed, though it is not as serious as
> the one which is stopping Sage buildi
On 4 Feb, 02:51, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Feb 3, 5:51 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
> > wrote:
> > > John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > >> On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > >>> Hi folks,
>
> > >>> I'm happy to announce that Sage
On Feb 3, 5:51 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
>
> wrote:
> > John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> >> On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> >>> Hi folks,
>
> >>> I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha3 [1] successfully builds
> >>> on t2.math. Due
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha3 [1] successfully builds
>>> on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
>
On Feb 3, 1:49 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > John H Palmieri wrote:
> >> On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> It seems to have crept in between alpha2 and alpha3, so you will not
> >>> observe it
> >>> in alpha1.
>
> >> of which release? This i
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
It seems to have crept in between alpha2 and alpha3, so you will not
observe it
in alpha1.
of which release? This is with 4.3.2.alpha1, and I thought you were
working on something derived from 4.3
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
It seems to have crept in between alpha2 and alpha3, so you will not observe it
in alpha1.
of which release? This is with 4.3.2.alpha1, and I thought you were
working on something derived from 4.3.0. But maybe I misunders
Hi John,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:08 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> In any case, if I want to test this on a system other than t2, what
> versions of Sage are relevant? (I thought the issue arose between
> 4.3.0 and 4.3.1, so trying with 4.3.2.alpha1 might be instructive.)
I think the relevant
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> It seems to have crept in between alpha2 and alpha3, so you will not observe
> it
> in alpha1.
of which release? This is with 4.3.2.alpha1, and I thought you were
working on something derived from 4.3.0. But maybe I misunderstood.
In any case, i
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha3 [1] successfully builds
on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
Sage 4.3.0.2.alpha3 since it's based on Sage 4.3.0.1 [2]. This alpha
release is bas
On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha3 [1] successfully builds
> on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
> Sage 4.3.0.2.alpha3 since it's based on Sage 4.3.0.1 [2]. This alpha
> release is based on Sage 4.3.
13 matches
Mail list logo
