Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Yes, I am pretty sure this is the problem too, now that you've explained it. Here is the output of readelf: wbhart@ASUS:~/SageMath/local/bin$ readelf -d gp | grep RPATH 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

wbhart@ASUS:~$ ldd /home/wbhart/SageMath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/complex_double.so linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffd8abf000) libpari-gmp-2.8.so.0 => /home/wbhart/SageMath/local/lib/libpari-gmp-2.8.so.0 (0x7f000977d000) libgmp.so.16 =>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 5:46:04 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: > > In particular, the ticket says the problem was fixed 2 months ago, and I > downloaded the tarball just yesterday. > Yes, but it was resolved as "wontfix", because the patch was added to a repository that Volker keeps outside

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Erik Bray wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel > wrote: >> [BIG SNIP] >> Note that one has access to the ordinary Windows file system, which people >> were worried about. And 'top' works. Microsoft are definitely on the right >> track

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

what is the output of ldd on /home/wbhart/SageMath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/complex_double.so (I guess it's linked to a system library, and on your system it's a different one...) On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 1:46:04 PM UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: > > In particular, the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

In particular, the ticket says the problem was fixed 2 months ago, and I downloaded the tarball just yesterday. Bill. On Thursday, 4 August 2016 14:44:40 UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: > > Thanks for the hint. Yes, I used a binary. However, I downloaded it > freshly from the Sage website, so I would

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Thanks for the hint. Yes, I used a binary. However, I downloaded it freshly from the Sage website, so I would guess it is not hit by any old issues? Bill. On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 21:27:39 UTC+2, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:16:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

I don't know. I've spoken to one expert and he thinks almost all the issues are due to interfaces that aren't implemented by Microsoft yet. They have an online poll where you can vote for the features you'd most like to see them implement. Many of the items have thousands of votes, and they are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel wrote: > There are some awful issues with WSL for now. It has a stack limit of 8MB > which means certain programs that expect a >= 16MB stack won't work. ulimit > refuses to increase the stack size. Thanks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Running "make" under WSL for Sage 7.2.rc2 consistently hangs for me at this line: checking whether rename honors trailing slash on source... Could that be related to limits you mention or is it some other error? On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 6:44:56 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: > > There are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:16:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: > > wbhart@ASUS:~/SageMath$ ./sage -gp > gp: error while loading shared libraries: libpari-gmp-2.8.so.0: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > Is this a binary distribution? There used to be a problem

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 18:23:27 UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote: > > Does at least "sage -gp" work? > > No. wbhart@ASUS:~/SageMath$ ./sage -gp gp: error while loading shared libraries: libpari-gmp-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Bill. -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

No I didn't. But I'll set it running overnight tonight. I wonder if it is possible to actually give someone login access to my laptop by starting the sshd or something like that. Bill. On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 18:23:27 UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote: > > Does at least "sage -gp" work? > > Did you

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Does at least "sage -gp" work? Did you run "make ptestlong" to launch the tests? If so there is a log in SAGE_ROOT/logs/ptestlong.log. That would be nice to have it! On 03/08/16 11:45, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel wrote: sage -t --all seems to be passing most of its tests. Any tests that

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

sage -t --all seems to be passing most of its tests. Any tests that require starting pari currently don't pass. There were also some complaints about uncommitted changes in the git tree. Also control.py failed its test. I managed to kill WSL (nothing to do with Sage) at the point Sage was half

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

There are some awful issues with WSL for now. It has a stack limit of 8MB which means certain programs that expect a >= 16MB stack won't work. ulimit refuses to increase the stack size. Building things can be *incredibly* slow. Not that this shouldn't be a major issue for now, since it is

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:03:50 AM UTC+2, leif wrote: > > VulK wrote: > > On the topic of performances I just came across this post on phoronix: > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-10-lxcore=1 > > > > TL;DR: benchmarks give surprisingly good performances

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

* leif [2016-08-03 11:03:38]: > VulK wrote: > > On the topic of performances I just came across this post on phoronix: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-10-lxcore=1 > > > > TL;DR: benchmarks give surprisingly good performances provided you do not >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

VulK wrote: > On the topic of performances I just came across this post on phoronix: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-10-lxcore=1 > > TL;DR: benchmarks give surprisingly good performances provided you do not > access the filesystem. At the moment, while running sage could

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On the topic of performances I just came across this post on phoronix: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-10-lxcore=1 TL;DR: benchmarks give surprisingly good performances provided you do not access the filesystem. At the moment, while running sage could be ok, this would make

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:29:22PM +0200, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> OS bashing will not be tolerated. >> > >> > But company bashing will... ;-) >> >> That's not really okay either--constructive criticisms are fine

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:29:22PM +0200, Erik Bray wrote: > >> OS bashing will not be tolerated. > > > > But company bashing will... ;-) > > That's not really okay either--constructive criticisms are fine +1 > but you never know where your next funding source will come from... This argument

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 23:12:03 UTC+2, leif wrote: > The only difference at the C level I know of is different #includes > (maybe some OS types and functions), and the size of long on 64-bit, > which is only 32 bits on 64-bit Windows (only long long is 64 bits > there), with some

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, leif wrote: >> William Stein wrote: >>> Regarding the above discussion about speed, what combination of >>> OS/Virtualization/Emulations/Native/etc. is actually fastest is not >>> something that can be determined by

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

The MPIR code runs ok on Windows, though it is always some small factor behind Linux (usually 15% where we've bothered to check). So far we've been unable to superoptimise for that platform because the OS just never gets quiet enough for the superoptimiser to work. However, there can be other

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, leif wrote: > William Stein wrote: >> Regarding the above discussion about speed, what combination of >> OS/Virtualization/Emulations/Native/etc. is actually fastest is not >> something that can be determined by "pure thought", since there

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

William Stein wrote: > Regarding the above discussion about speed, what combination of > OS/Virtualization/Emulations/Native/etc. is actually fastest is not > something that can be determined by "pure thought", since there are > two additional factors (which I saw a lot in work of Bill Hart, Jason

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, leif wrote: OS bashing will not be tolerated. >>> >>> But company bashing will... ;-)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:33 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, leif wrote: >>> OS bashing will not be tolerated. >> >> But company bashing will... ;-) >> >> Microsoft used to have a POSIX layer also; no idea what happened to that

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, leif wrote: >> OS bashing will not be tolerated. > > But company bashing will... ;-) > > Microsoft used to have a POSIX layer also; no idea what happened to that > (and how usable it actually was/is). > > But it never made it into mainstream

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:21 PM, leif wrote: > Erik Bray wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Delecroix >> <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 26/07/16 07:52, Volker Braun wrote: On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 1:25:34 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Erik Bray wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Delecroix > <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 26/07/16 07:52, Volker Braun wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 1:25:34 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: 2) Currently this feature is intended as a developer

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows

Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, VulK wrote: > >> Clearly performance are not going to be good, native applications are >> the way to go for this; on the other hand I am not sure it is much (or >> at all?) slower than a virtual machine setup. > > Virtualization is not emulation.