> Now for the serious stuff as we need to figure what's going wrong at some
> stage
> so here are some of our failures:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/modular_symbols.rst"
> *
> File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/bor
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:23:58 Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> MPIR is supposed to be a drop in replacement for GMP and provides a
> "compatibility" mode, so we really are linking to MPIR. (It's also
> force of habit, and easier than patching all the upstream packages).
>
Well it will be easier to fix
On Feb 16, 2010, at 12:18 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:41:31 William Stein wrote:
If you link against mpir then the above discrepancy would go away.
However, i can also tell you that the above discrepancy is harmless.
The issue is simply that both answers are right. e.g.,
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:41:31 William Stein wrote:
> If you link against mpir then the above discrepancy would go away.
> However, i can also tell you that the above discrepancy is harmless.
> The issue is simply that both answers are right. e.g., the line
>
> sage: x = crt(2, 1, 3, 5); x
>
> us
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:38:59 Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Another issue with the piecemeal approach is that upgrading a
> component could suddenly cause Sage to break. Have you given any
> thought to how you will handle this?
>
Kind of. We can have several versions of the same package in tree.
We
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:41:31 William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:40:11 William Stein wrote:
> >> > sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst"
> >> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:40:11 William Stein wrote:
>> > sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst"
>> > **
>> > File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour
On Feb 15, 2010, at 3:09 PM, François Bissey wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:40:11 William Stein wrote:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst"
**
File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst",
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:40:11 William Stein wrote:
> > sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst"
> > **
> > File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_numtheory.rst", line 94:
> >sage: x = crt(2, 1, 3, 5); x
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:54 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:47:45 Georg S. Weber wrote:
>> On 15 Feb., 12:38, cschwan wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > since this is my first post on this list I think it is a good idea to
>> > briefly introduce myself: My name is Christopher Schw
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:47:45 Georg S. Weber wrote:
> On 15 Feb., 12:38, cschwan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > since this is my first post on this list I think it is a good idea to
> > briefly introduce myself: My name is Christopher Schwan, I am studying
> > physics at Uni Mainz (Germany) and I am one
> Though these would be good to fix, I'm wary of all of the above for a
> "stabilization release."
Oh, I overlooked the most important part: "Stabilization" release -
the tickets wouldnt serve that purpose, of course. Nevertheless, these
would be the ones which I would like to see fixed :) .
> So
On 15 Feb., 12:38, cschwan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since this is my first post on this list I think it is a good idea to
> briefly introduce myself: My name is Christopher Schwan, I am studying
> physics at Uni Mainz (Germany) and I am one of the maintainers of
> "sage-on-gentoo" (http://github.com/cs
13 matches
Mail list logo
