On Aug 29, 12:21 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Using the first release of Solaris 10
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Using the first release of Solaris 10 should iron out any other
portability issues, since perhaps our build process
On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Using the first release of Solaris 10 should iron out any other
portability issues, since perhaps our build process makes some
assumptions about Solaris 10 which are not valid in the initial release.
You also mentioned that
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Using the first release of Solaris 10 should iron out any other
portability issues, since perhaps our build process makes some
assumptions
You also mentioned that the setup in this machine would be
intentionally less polished (i.e. GNU make is not default, and other
things you set up for T2). Would it be possible to evolve the T2 setup
towards something more out-of-the-box? Or is it unrealistic to build
all Sage
