[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-14 Thread MartinX
Successful build with the sage atlas.spkg using 'fast' default arch, but if I build with environment set to use my own atlas ( also 3.8.4) matplotlib won't build; it thinks numpy is not installed. Not sure if this is specific to 4.8 as I have only just got my atlas up and running. All but, three te

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 07/01/2012 09:37, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : by the way, I do "make -j3" on my ARM box. It holds up OK, and does not seem to take 30h to build the thing. Building documentation is something that really takes forever there, though... I launched a new compilation 20h ago with "make -j 3", and fr

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-09 Thread RegB
PS to earlier post; My build was with the p2 version of the readline package. FWIW, but I still have the same failure with; "make ptestlong" I tried again after a; "make clean", but got the same failure. Will play around with it later, but I think readline.p2 is OK on my Ubuntu 11.10 and on my Kub

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-08 Thread RegB
Bahh, disappointed (-: Using 'make ptestlong' I just got; = sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/ cuspidal_submodule.py [7.3 s] sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/element.

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-08 Thread Adam Webb
On Jan 7, 5:39 am, John Cremona wrote: > (24 hours later) > > Successfully built 4.8.alpha6 > withhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/readline-6.2.p3.spkg > put into spkg/standard before starting to build.  All long tests pass > and there is no warning about readline, and history

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-08 Thread RegB
It ran straight through here. DETAILS: Toshiba Satellite P775 laptop, i7, 8 Gig Ram, Windows 7 Home Premium, Virtual Box allowed 4 Gig Ram and 95% of available processor(s), no attempt made to "throttle" the host machine, or the guest. Almost 3 hours, but from the size of the Atlas log file 15.7 M

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-07 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 07/01/2012 09:37, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : by the way, I do "make -j3" on my ARM box. It holds up OK, and does not seem to take 30h to build the thing. Building documentation is something that really takes forever there, though... Oh? I never *dared* using -j... How long does it take to buil

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
by the way, I do "make -j3" on my ARM box. It holds up OK, and does not seem to take 30h to build the thing. Building documentation is something that really takes forever there, though... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, sen

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-07 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 07/01/2012 05:44, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : For me, alpha5 built OK on an ARM box running 11.10. (it needed a couple of ARM-specific fixes, but otherwise was just fine). It does not have readline-dev installed, which probably explains why I had not R-related problems. Should one expect any regr

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
For me, alpha5 built OK on an ARM box running 11.10. (it needed a couple of ARM-specific fixes, but otherwise was just fine). It does not have readline-dev installed, which probably explains why I had not R-related problems. Should one expect any regressions with alpha6? Dima -- To post to thi

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread john.hoebing
And finally, 'make ptestlong' gives: make ptestlong ... -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 1307.0 seconds -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread john.hoebing
On Jan 5, 3:03 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:21:37 PM UTC-8, john.hoebing wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote: > > > > Will this procedure work?  Surely ./sage -i will not work with a > > > half-built system? Well, I am trying... > > > No that won't

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:21:37 PM UTC-8, john.hoebing wrote: > > On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote: > > > > Will this procedure work? Surely ./sage -i will not work with a > > half-built system? Well, I am trying... > > No that won't work, as some others have already found. It

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread john.hoebing
On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote: > > Will this procedure work?  Surely ./sage -i will not work with a > half-built system? Well, I am trying... No that won't work, as some others have already found. In the early days of testing new r spkgs we had to go back and rebuild from scratch, doing

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread Eviatar
I also get this on Sage 4.7.2 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.o

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread Eviatar
It seems ATLAS is failing again: IN STAGE 1 INSTALL: SYSTEM PROBE/AUX COMPILE make[3]: *** [build] Error 255 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/eviatar/Desktop/sage-4.8.alpha6/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.4/ATLAS-build' make[2]: *** [build] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/eviatar/Desktop/sage-