On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:04:24 -0800 (PST)
Emil Widmann wrote:
...
> Additional examples what base means for the most common
> architectures would be terrific!
...
Additionally there could maybe be a reference to the code, as examples
will get outdated. In this case that would be configure_base i
Feel free to change it ;-)
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 1:04:24 PM UTC, Emil Widmann wrote:
>
> http://sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html#environment-variables
> Maybe it is possible to mention this in the docs (SAGE_FAT_BINARIES and
> SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH are exclusive) and that SAGE_FAT_BINA
I'd say the working definition of SAGE_FAT_BINARY is "made within the last
10 years".
In particular, it implies SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, which is the slowest
"generic" target. You can build even slower ones on certain architectures.
There is no way to build Sage on every x86 cpu, that would incl
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 8:01:54 AM UTC, Emil Widmann wrote:
>
> Why is it entirely wrong to set SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH to the empty string
>
It is not a valid setting. Allowed values are
SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=[threads:n,][static,]arch[,isaext1][,isaext2]...[,isaextN]
So if you set it at all then arch i
I'd say the working definition of SAGE_FAT_BINARY is "made within the last
10 years".
In particular, it implies SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, which is the slowest
"generic" target. You can build even slower ones on certain architectures.
There is no way to build Sage on every x86 cpu, that would incl
Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2013 22:39:21 UTC schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> Also, fortran is a build-time dependency (but not runtime). You either
> install your distro's fortran, or you compile gcc (which includes fortran).
> You did both.
>
OK, this is clear in hindsight, and after reading the documen
On 2013-12-24 09:01, Emil Widmann wrote:
May I still ask what is "generic" and
which processor will be the minimum on the x86 scale that will be
supportet with SAGE_FAT_BINARIES?
It is SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes and it should in theory work with all x86
processors, although it's hard to test whether th
Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2013 22:36:34 UTC schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> On Monday, December 23, 2013 10:07:12 PM UTC, Emil Widmann wrote
>>
>> *Hiccup 2: SAGE_FAT_BINARIES / SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH conflict*
>>
>
> It seems that you set both, which does not make sense. SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
> will build a bin
The maxima issue is http://trac.sagemath.org/15546
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
Also, fortran is a build-time dependency (but not runtime). You either
install your distro's fortran, or you compile gcc (which includes fortran).
You did both.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and s
On Monday, December 23, 2013 10:07:12 PM UTC, Emil Widmann wrote
>
> *Hiccup 2: SAGE_FAT_BINARIES / SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH conflict*
>
It seems that you set both, which does not make sense. SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
will build a binary that we consider "generic". You either build that, or
you specify the arc
11 matches
Mail list logo
