David Roe wrote:
If 4.3 plus one single patch would do it, I think it's completely worth
while.
Yes, me too. Minh has now created the file. I'm just building it now.
If you know what that patch should be, make a ticket and post
it.
The patch is this one.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_t
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Jan-27 19:24:18 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>>It does not seem unreasonable to check ones patches on Solaris, OS X and one
>>linux distro. Of course it does not guarantee it will work on every linux
>>distro, but it would hav
If 4.3 plus one single patch would do it, I think it's completely worth
while. If you know what that patch should be, make a ticket and post it.
Having a version that works on Solaris out of the box is worth having an out
of sequence release. Then we just need a source tarball at minimum, right?
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
It does not seem unreasonable to check ones patches on Solaris, OS X
and one linux distro.
I would say that this is unreasonable. Especially for casual or
first-time contributors. But we've had this discussion befo
On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris.
Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris.
Nor do I. Or test
On 2010-Jan-27 19:24:18 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>It does not seem unreasonable to check ones patches on Solaris, OS X and one
>linux distro. Of course it does not guarantee it will work on every linux
>distro, but it would have a reasonable probability of doing so.
What's needed is a
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris.
Nor do I. Or test every patch on all of Ubuntu, RedHat, Debian, OS X,
e
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris.
Nor do I. Or test every patch on all of Ubuntu, RedHat, Debian, OS X,
etc. (and soon Cygwin),
Martin Albrecht wrote:
People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris. Yet 't2' is
available for anyone to test their changes. That machine was supplied
free by Sun, who obviously want to see Sage running on Solaris.
For s
> People often CC me onto tickets to test on Solaris. Unfortunately, I
> don't have the time to test every patch on Solaris. Yet 't2' is
> available for anyone to test their changes. That machine was supplied
> free by Sun, who obviously want to see Sage running on Solaris.
For some reason I have
Since versions 4.2 Sage would build on Solaris 10 SPARC using gcc.
The last remaining issue to prevent this:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6579
which was solved 3 months ago. However, it would not build if the Sun
compilers were installed - since the Sage library chose the Sun C++
rather
11 matches
Mail list logo
