On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:07 PM, gsage sambe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 6:32 pm, gsage sambe...@gmail.com wrote:
I extracted atom binary on my eeepc 900A. The following error message
occurs
Error setting environment variables by running /home/net/documents/
python
Why does a Matrix not possess the function full_simpify. I.e. why does
P.full_simplify() not work?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi,
I've got a question.
When you have 2 variables q1 and q2, is it possible to simplify an
expression like this:
cos(q1)*cos(q2) - sin(q1)*sin(q2)
to obtain the following result : cos(q1+q2) ?
Thanks in advance
Alexandre Mollet
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
Hi All,
I am facing problems in configure sage-notebook in my
desktop. though i had follow all guide line which is given
onhttp://www.sagemath.org/doc/inst/node6.html but struck some where in
the middle
bugs:-
a...@arun:~/Desktop/sage-3.2.3$ su
Password:
yes, this is what i want !
BUT i cant compute the eigenvectors symbolically within SAGE.
So for example
A.eigenvectors()
gives the error:
AttributeError: 'sage.matrix.matrix_symbolic_dense.Matrix_symbolic_'
object has no attribute 'eigenvectors'
how can i now compute those eigenvectors within
alex wrote:
yes, this is what i want !
BUT i cant compute the eigenvectors symbolically within SAGE.
So for example
A.eigenvectors()
gives the error:
AttributeError: 'sage.matrix.matrix_symbolic_dense.Matrix_symbolic_'
object has no attribute 'eigenvectors'
how can i now compute
Iwan Lappo-Danilewski wrote:
Why does a Matrix not possess the function full_simpify. I.e. why does
P.full_simplify() not work?
It's probably because no one has written it yet. I think it'd be great
to have. We welcome any patches to do that.
You can do the same thing using the apply_map
Hello all
Maxima is much better when drawing 2D plots of functions with jump
discontinuity.
Sage makes a vertical lines at disontinuities, compare
A=plot(1/(x^2-1),(x,-3,3))
show(A,ymax=10,ymin=-10)
in sage and
plot2d(1/(x^2-1),[x,-3,3],[y,-10,10])
in Maxima. Is it possible to remove these
i have trouble in collecting the eigenvectors to form an eigenvector
matrix (in the order given by the eigenvalue computation...).
How can i do this ?
I have tried all matrix commands.
THX.
On Mar 4, 6:22 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Alexander Hupfer wrote:
thank you
How can I collect the eigenvectors to form an eigenvector matrix ?
I have tried all matrix commands and I always get some error !
Sorry,
THX
On Mar 10, 3:27 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Iwan Lappo-Danilewski wrote:
Why does a Matrix not possess the function
Hi Craig,
I think it is better option (1), but where can I get 3.4.rcl? I don't
see it in the website of Sage.
In your opinion, which option is better?
---Alex
On 9 mar, 21:21, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
After I found a bug in sage 3.2.3 ( see Division error in Sage
On Mar 10, 10:44 am, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
Hello all
Maxima is much better when drawing 2D plots of functions with jump
discontinuity.
Sage makes a vertical lines at disontinuities, compare
A=plot(1/(x^2-1),(x,-3,3))
show(A,ymax=10,ymin=-10)
in sage and
Thanks again for your help.
The textbook I am teaching linear algebra from prints matrices
with brackets as delimeters. [ ]. Hence when I set a test and
write solutions with LateX I wish to use the same notation for
matrices as used in the text.
But just using the standard way to include
This seems to work:
given a symbolic matrix P of dimension 2x2 do:
EVECP = maxima(P).eigenvectors()
EVEC1 = EVECP.part(2)
(first eigenvector)
EVEC2 = EVECP.part(3)
(second eigenvector)
EIGENVECT = (matrix(SR, 2,2, [EVEC1.sage(), EVEC2.sage()])).transpose
()
In integrals variable integration limits work fine with sage.
Now I would like to plot the variable integration range with plot3d or
parametric_plot3d using variable plot range limits:
u,v = var('u v')
parametric_plot3d([u, v, u*0.1], (u, 0, 6), (v, 0, u))
But I get the following errors
Hello everyone!
I am running Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05 in a virtual
machine under Windows Vista.
I am trying to compute the variety of an ideal in a Boolean Polynomial
Ring. From what I have seen in previous posts, that doesn't seem to
work directly. So instead I use the
Hi Alex,
I think it is better option (1), but where can I get 3.4.rcl? I don't
see it in the website of Sage.
In your opinion, which option is better?
I'd definitely go with option (1), as long as you don't mind leaving
it building for a few hours. Jaap was already nice enough to post a
roleic wrote:
In integrals variable integration limits work fine with sage.
Now I would like to plot the variable integration range with plot3d or
parametric_plot3d using variable plot range limits:
u,v = var('u v')
parametric_plot3d([u, v, u*0.1], (u, 0, 6), (v, 0, u))
But I get the
Thanks for having a look!
On Mar 10, 1:33 pm, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
{{{id=2|
%time
B.x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,x11,x12,x13,x14,x15,x16,x17,x18,x19,x20,x
21,x22,x23,x24,x25,x26,x27,x28,x29,x30=BooleanPolynomialRing
(30,order='lex')
I1=ideal([x13*x15
alex wrote:
i have trouble in collecting the eigenvectors to form an eigenvector
matrix (in the order given by the eigenvalue computation...).
How can i do this ?
I have tried all matrix commands.
For a normal matrix (i.e., not symbolic), you'll probably want to use
the
nsauer wrote:
Thanks again for your help.
The textbook I am teaching linear algebra from prints matrices
with brackets as delimeters. [ ]. Hence when I set a test and
write solutions with LateX I wish to use the same notation for
matrices as used in the text.
But just using the standard
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
nsauer wrote:
Thanks again for your help.
The textbook I am teaching linear algebra from prints matrices
with brackets as delimeters. [ ]. Hence when I set a test and
write solutions with LateX I wish to use
Thanks for your reply;
As I am completely new to sage I do not know how to
perform the indicated change. I looked at the file
sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix0.pyx
but could not figure out how and where to add
the function sage.matrix.matrix0.set_latex_delimiters('[',']')
Norbert
On Mar 10, 1:34
On Mar 10, 1:00 pm, nsauer nsa...@math.ucalgary.ca wrote:
Thanks for your reply;
As I am completely new to sage I do not know how to
perform the indicated change. I looked at the file
sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix0.pyx
but could not figure out how and where to add
the function
Hi Kumar,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Kumar arun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing problems in configure sage-notebook in my
desktop. though i had follow all guide line which is given
onhttp://www.sagemath.org/doc/inst/node6.html but struck some where in
the middle
On Mar 10, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jason Grout
[snip]
I agree that this should be an option. Also, the delimiters for vectors
should be an option.
+1.
How about adding a function to matrix0.pyx that sets a global variable
in
Hi Alexandre,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:35 AM, alexandre.mol...@fpms.ac.be
alex.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
cos(q1)*cos(q2) - sin(q1)*sin(q2)
to obtain the following result : cos(q1+q2) ?
We don't have the Maxima function trigreduce wrapped in Sage, but you
can access it like this:
sage: f =
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 10, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jason Grout
[snip]
I agree that this should be an option. Also, the delimiters for vectors
should be an option.
Platform/OS: MAC OS X 10.5.6
SAGE Version 3.0.2, Release Date: 2008-05-24
I have loaded Sage onto my system from a DVD and put it in my
application folder and am stuck on the README instructions. It says to
double click on the sage icon and then:
Choose Applications, then select All
Does anyone know what's up with this weird error? Sage can multiply a
symbolic variable and a constant of a polynomial ring R but not a
symbolic variable and an element of R.base_ring().
Alex
sage: var('t')
t
sage: K.a= NumberField(t^2+2,'a')
sage: R.x= PolynomialRing(K)
sage: t*R(a)
a*t
sage:
Thanks for the help. I made the changes
but failed to recompile. Here is what I did:
(test is my home name) where is this sage binary?
Laptop-3:~ test$ sage -b
-bash: sage: command not found
Laptop-3:/ test$ sage -b
-bash: sage: command not found
Laptop-3:sage test$ sage -b
-bash: sage:
How are you starting up Sage? If you're starting up sage via
/path/into/folder/sage
then you'll have to do
/path/into/folder/sage -b
On Mar 10, 2009, at 8:52 PM, nsauer wrote:
Thanks for the help. I made the changes
but failed to recompile. Here is what I did:
(test is my home name)
On Mar 10, 2009, at 8:57 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
On Mar 10, 6:47 pm, Alex Raichev tortoise.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with this weird error? Sage can
multiply a
symbolic variable and a constant of a polynomial ring R but not a
symbolic variable and an element of
I had the same problem. Just disregard those instructions.
If the terminal with a sage prompt opens, you are o.k.
Norbert
On Mar 10, 6:35 pm, william wll...@gmail.com wrote:
Platform/OS: MAC OS X 10.5.6
SAGE Version 3.0.2, Release Date: 2008-05-24
I have loaded Sage onto my system from a
On Mar 10, 8:35 pm, william wll...@gmail.com wrote:
Platform/OS: MAC OS X 10.5.6
SAGE Version 3.0.2, Release Date: 2008-05-24
I have loaded Sage onto my system from a DVD and put it in my
application folder and am stuck on the README instructions. It says to
double click on the sage icon
On Mar 10, 5:35 pm, william wll...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Platform/OS: MAC OS X 10.5.6
SAGE Version 3.0.2, Release Date: 2008-05-24
I have loaded Sage onto my system from a DVD and put it in my
application folder and am stuck on the README instructions. It says to
double click on the sage
36 matches
Mail list logo