[sage-support] Sage's R (6.0) mucks up path and libraries search on amd64 (at least Debian).

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Sage's 6.0 implementation seems to muck up the way R finds libraries and/or executables on amd64, at least on Debian systems. My main system is Debian (testing) running on a Core i7 laptop with plenty of RAM. I've also set up a virtual machine (VirtualBox) with i686 Debian in order to cross-com

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Thank you. I missed that "online help". Silly me... -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le dimanche 22 décembre 2013 16:39:27 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > > The "dev" object in Sage is equivalent to the "sage -dev" command line. > Arguments are translated between Python to Shell calling conventions, so

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Volker Braun
The "dev" object in Sage is equivalent to the "sage -dev" command line. Arguments are translated between Python to Shell calling conventions, so $ sage -dev diff --base master is the same as sage: dev.diff(base='master') Help overview: $ sage -dev help usage: sage-dev [-h] subcommand ... T

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Thanks to Volker's explanations, the relevant ticket is again at "needs review". Thanks a lot for your help. -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le dimanche 22 décembre 2013 16:22:42 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > Thank you very much, Volker ! I definitely

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Thank you very much, Volker ! I definitely need to take some time to **learn** git. BTW : the -dev commands currently have no direct documentation *per se*. There is a lot of examples in the developer's guide, and the reference manual has a "SageDev" section, but neither is clear as to what sag

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:32:57 AM UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > 1) working on another machine, with a brand-new sage tree, I have not been > able to get my work back : > sage -dev checkout --ticket 15561 > This does work. See the output of "git log": $ git log -4 commit f570a62601ee

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear Volker, Thank you for this note. I added a relevant comment to the ticket (and attached the tarball, since it's a small one). Any idea about how to retrieve this branch on another machine (with the same trac identifier, of course...) ? -- Emmanuel C

[sage-support] Re: Failed compile of Sage 5.13, ATLAS spkg on PowerBook G4, OS X 10.5.8

2013-12-22 Thread Volker Braun
Whats the content of your /usr/local/sage-5.13/spkg/build/atlas-3.10.1.p7/src/ATLAS-build/lib/ directory, there should be a liblapack but apparently is not. Maybe search through the whole log to see if there were any errors with lapack On Sunday, December 22, 2013 5:37:41 AM UTC, Alexander Pow

[sage-support] Re: I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Volker Braun
The tarball is *not* part of the git repository, only its checksum. You need to indicate on the ticket if you need any additional tarball, which (at least for now) will the be copied manually to http://www.sagemath.org/packages/upstream/ On Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:32:57 AM UTC, Emmanuel C

[sage-support] I need a bit of git handholding...

2013-12-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear list I noted problems with freetype on my machine ; Volker Braun diagnosed (in this thread ) that the current sage's freetype had problems with fonts currently installed on my machine. Therefore I went ahead, created trac#1