[sage-support] Sage 7.0: changes in cartesian product, how to make Combinations work as its input?

2016-01-30 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hello, in earlier versions of sage this worked: Omega = Combinations([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], 4) A1 = Combinations([1], 1) A2 = Combinations([2, 3, 4, 5, 6], 3) A = CartesianProduct(A1, A2) A.cardinality() / Omega.cardinality() which we used in book for high school students to illustrate basic pro

[sage-support] Re: Plot saving segfault on 6.8, works on 6.7 (same machine, same config)

2015-07-29 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
at 10:02:54 PM UTC+2, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: >> >> Hello again, >> >> I have fresh build of sage 6.8 that (after setting locale) passed all >> tests. Unfortunately when I tried to build my book which works with >> sage 6.7 built on same machine with same op

[sage-support] Plot saving segfault on 6.8, works on 6.7 (same machine, same config)

2015-07-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hello again, I have fresh build of sage 6.8 that (after setting locale) passed all tests. Unfortunately when I tried to build my book which works with sage 6.7 built on same machine with same options - I'm getting segfault. It occurs when I try to save the plot into svg for the second time after

[sage-support] Re: sage-6.8 - two failed tests for R interface

2015-07-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Just a follow up, when built with locale set, all tests passed - including one with multiply returned completions. Regards, Andrzej. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

[sage-support] Re: sage-6.8 - two failed tests for R interface

2015-07-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Haven't seen that one before. Did you build from scratch? Which OS? > > > > On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 10:07:42 PM UTC+2, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> today I compiled sage-6.8 on my machine. Got

[sage-support] sage-6.8 - two failed tests for R interface

2015-07-27 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hello, today I compiled sage-6.8 on my machine. Got two failures in R interface - very strange ones I must say - http://pastebin.com/Lvt6Lqt6 - all other tests pass. Anyone seen such error? In completions each method is listed twice and importing foobar does not raise exception. Regards, Andrzej

Re: [sage-support] sagetex difficulty

2012-06-11 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Had similar issue some time ago on my document build server. Most likely another sagetex.sty installed with texlive/package management? It's easy to check which file is used in TeX by doing kpsewhich sagetex.sty Another possibility is that you have to run "texhash" to make TeX update files it kno

Re: [sage-support] Re: Anyone have experience of running Sage Notebook on Kindle 3 web browser?

2011-04-27 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rado wrote: > I just tried it and it works quite nice. Only annoying part is that numbers > and parenthesis are not on the keyboard, so you have to navigate with arrows > to select them then typing. The actual webpage rending is fine. I did > plotting. Even graph e

[sage-support] Anyone have experience of running Sage Notebook on Kindle 3 web browser?

2011-04-25 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, I don't have the device anywhere to test and did haven't found any information on list, so I decided to ask if someone tested how the notebook interface looks like on Kindle 3 web browser? I've heard that web browser of Kindle 3 can handle lots of standard web pages (iirc it's based on webkit

Re: [sage-support] sse2 problem resolved

2011-03-06 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Yes, I also had similar problems with plotting on Arch Linux when used pre-built packages on my other machine which is two CPU Pentium III machine. In my case it is said to be related to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9382 - because package maintainer built it in a way that should work (

Re: [sage-support] Re: Accessing R documentation trough notebook broken with 4.6.1?

2011-02-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
rusty here and there. Andrzej. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 02/28/11 04:08 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 28, 3:21 am, Andrzej Giniewicz  wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> today I noticed that I cannot acc

[sage-support] Accessing R documentation trough notebook broken with 4.6.1?

2011-02-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hello, today I noticed that I cannot access R docs trough notebook, while it still works like usual from command line. This is what is inside notebook when viewed as text: sage: r.lm? Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "_sage_input_3.py", line 10, in exec compi

Re: [sage-support] doubly noncentral F distribution

2010-10-28 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Is there any code for cdf of double noncentral F distribution? I think that SciPy.Stats have what you need. Check http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.ncf.html#scipy.stats.ncf - just verify the parameter order in the

Re: [sage-support] Re: Some R integration samples - is there better way to do it?

2010-07-07 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > Note the following in > > sage: r.set? > > Definition:     r.set(self, var, value) > Docstring: >       Set the variable var in R to what the string value evaluates to > in >       R. > >       INPUT: >          var -- a string value -- a string > >       EXAMPLES: >          sage: r.set('a'

Re: [sage-support] Some R integration samples - is there better way to do it?

2010-07-07 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
think :) cheers, Andrzej. On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote: >> Hi Andrezj, >> >> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> recently

[sage-support] Some R integration samples - is there better way to do it?

2010-07-04 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, recently I have given short introductory talk about Sage and questions about integration with R arisen. Results of quickly put together code is now at http://sagenb.org/home/pub/2232/ - especially, the question was: "I have variable named x in R environment and want to get its value, or variab

[sage-support] Incomplete gamma: when returned by integrate it's named gamma_incomplete instead of gamma_inc, known issue?

2010-03-23 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
I noticed this today, for some mysterious reason integrate returns non existing gamma_incomplete instead of gamma_inc, look at: [gi...@raven3 ~]$ sage -- | Sage Version 4.3.4, Release Date: 2010-03-19 | | Typ

Re: [sage-support] Sage 4.3.3 Fails To Build On 64 bit Linux System (gcc.4.4.2)

2010-03-21 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
> Does the 64 bit build need some 32 bit libraries or is it > the case that the sage-4.3.3 doesn't yet build on a gcc.4.4.3 compiler? issue is probably somewhere else, I don't know about 4.3.3, but I just finished building sage 4.3.4 with gcc 4.4.3 on latest pure 64 bit Arch Linux (without lib32-*

Re: [sage-support] BoxPlot in Sage: how do we plot?

2010-03-14 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
I don't know, lately R seems bit broken for me at least. I tried boxplotting but it cannot find Hmisc package. Installing package on other hand fails with R include directory is empty -- perhaps need to install R-devel.rpm or similar last time I remember it worked though, but it was long before R

Re: [sage-support] Re: Xelatex and Sage notebook

2010-03-07 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
> And what about LuaTeX? I think that it is better to keep "normal" > latex (which is usually pdflatex in dvi mode), pdflatex and add other > TeX's as option. I'd vote for LuaTeX instead of XeTeX, it's lot more compatible, iirc only 2 options from microtype package do not work with it and it's sof

Re: [sage-support] Re: Setting up a sage server securely for students' use

2010-03-02 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
> How about a new "Administering Sage" book added to the documentation? > Setting up a campus server, security concerns, etc., could be noted in it. any news on this topic? I'll need something similar soon so I wonder if I should use Byungchuls description and some digging or there is already some

[sage-support] Re: DSage on Amazon EC2

2009-04-27 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > Do you intend to build a cluster this way or just want to test/develop > dsage ? right now just for tests, later for personal use in simulations to get more processing power reserve to speed up some simulation for cost of one beer and who know what more if it will be working - surely will

[sage-support] DSage on Amazon EC2

2009-04-25 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, I just wonder - does anyone have experience on running DSage on Amazon EC2 (on preferably more than one instance) or similar Cloud-Computing service? I'm preparing to try out the platform but because of it's non- zero cost I'd prefer not go in blind, would be very happy if someone who did it

[sage-support] Re: Sage on ASUS Eee PC 901 Intel Atom

2009-03-05 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > I would build from source except I that ASUS does not make it simple > to install gcc and make and the like.  Is it possible to build from > source from my desktop running 32bit Ubuntu so that it works on Atom > Xandros, and if so, how? well, I also have EEE 901 and it's not that hard afte

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

2008-04-24 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > So is Arch a direct descendent of Gentoo, i.e does it us a descendent > of its ebuild system? nope, Arch build system is more lightweight, it's PKGBUILD is like ebuild just in BASH not Python, it's also made for binrary distribution in mind with possible easy rebuild by user, while on Ge

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

2008-04-23 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors - > > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I > > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later release - there > > was second release, wasn't it?) - anyway - there's proof it works f

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

2008-04-23 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, > > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch > > Linux. It works without any problem. > > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting > > the following errors when I run the sage after finishing the > > compilation successfully: > > I

[sage-support] Re: Can I still get binaries for version 2.10.4?

2008-04-17 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
I can confirm that 2.10.4 builds with 512MB of RAM - but then I upgraded GCC to 4.3 so cannot say anything about 2.11 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTE

[sage-support] Re: sage 2.10 - still problems with getting R work [ticket 1476]

2008-01-24 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
btw... in 1476 I also mentioned that sage-fortran (and it turns out that also g95) isn't able to build Hmisc package that is required by many others, is it possible to tell sage to use locally installed fortran compiler? (as in gfortran it works) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~--

[sage-support] sage 2.10 - still problems with getting R work [ticket 1476]

2008-01-24 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1476 was closed some time ago as works-for-me, but both problems I was pointing out during 2.8.15 release are still here... I'm still getting http://giniu.ravenlord.ws/result.txt - first is small - in file $SAGE/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ rpy.py

[sage-support] Re: Sage-2.9

2007-12-16 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Just finished building it... it took over 7hours on my machine, but it was worth it :)... btw - both 2 things about R are still actual in 2.9, that's "_" -> "." change for rpy to report version, and some comments to enable optional package installation... apart from that it is sweet :)... congratu

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-12 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
tried to test it... but funny things, at first I wasn't able to install any package... take a look at this: gcc -std=gnu99 -I/opt/sage/local/lib/r//include -I/opt/sage/local/lib/ r//include -I/usr/local/include WARNING: ignoring environment value of R_HOME -fvisibility=hidden -fpic -I/opt/sage

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-10 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
On 10 Gru, 21:45, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 12:26 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > OK... > > > so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at > >

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-10 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
or new... I'm going to build clean sage and then get this package... will report back when it will be ready but it will take some time... sorry for troubles, didn't thought it can be old-file-problem, A. On 10 Gru, 20:48, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-10 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
0:48, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 11:33 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrze

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-10 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-10 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got: sage: import rpy --- Traceback (most recent call last) /home/giniu/ in () /opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-04 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
I don't actually know, but as I mentioned before, even when I run version from that package outside of sage, I get that error about X11... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send e

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-04 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
> I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely > possible. when I do sage: r.png() I get: : Error in function (filename = "Rplot %03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, : X11 is not available and well.. that's both from console and notebook, and from plain R /o

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-04 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
WooHoo :) that's great news... I'm just upgrading it to look around asap... :) btw, is it really true that R interface is so-almost-ready that it could be included in release planned for end of week so in few days? I would be quite amazed to see it so soon :) regards, Andrzej

[sage-support] Re: sage 2.8.13: g0n - cremona.spkg failed to build, 32bit linux, gcc-4.2.2

2007-11-24 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Great work, that error is no longer here :)... I'm still compiling other packages so if there will be any further problems I will report back, but it is already after last time critical point... sorry for long reply and no log, I was really busy with my tasks and today checked list first time fro

[sage-support] sage 2.8.13: g0n - cremona.spkg failed to build, 32bit linux, gcc-4.2.2

2007-11-23 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
ng current Arch Linux, that is GCC 4.2.2, gLibc 2.7, kernel 2.6.23.8. Is there some workaround? anyway thanks for great software, can't wait till there will be R interface - it will for sure make Sage the software of choice for many :) best regards, Andrzej Giniewicz. --~--~-~--~~