Thanks for posting the new example. I have found that the problem is
due to the fact that Sage puts the output inside a block, and
IE7 gets confused about some of its measurements in that case. It can
be fixed by including
span.typeset {
white-space: normal;
}
in the css/main.css fil
It looks like this notebook no longer uses jsMath to render the result
of var('n m'), so I can't reproduce the problem you describe. I do
know that jsMath was used earlier when we were looking at the IE font
issue. Did this change as a result of the Sage update that you did,
or is it something y
OK, from the testing that I've done, it looks like this is, indeed,
the problem, and you won't have to do the testing that I suggested.
It turns out that this problem was fixed in version 3.6b of jsMath,
and you are running 3.6a, so if you download the latest version of
jsMath and replace the cop
this is really the problem.
In the meanwhile, I will work on that part of the jsMath code and get
it to include the port number.
Davide
On Apr 20, 11:15 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 10:16, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
>
> > dpvc wrote:
> >>> By work
> By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely rendered
> equations, while IE only displays raw latex code.
OK, thanks for the clarification. I had misunderstood. In Firefox,
can you click on the "jsMath" button in the lower right and tell me
what font mode is reported next to
I do not think it is a jsMath bug. If I understand you, by "works
correctly" you mean that Firefox doesn't show the font warning message
(while IE7 does, which you consider not working correctly). You have
tried several means of installing the jsMath image fonts as a solution
to this problem.
T
> I certainly don't understand
> why interact works in my browser but sometimes not theirs, or why
> jsmath wouldn't render in FF3 on Windows when it renders fine in IE
> and Safari from that same server!
FF3 changed a number of its internal features, including some
important changes to the secur
> We have an optional sage package for the
> image fonts that is easy to install. You're right, we decided to not
> make it standard because of the size.
OK, sounds good.
> Currently, if the jsmath image fonts are not installed, we add the
> following code to the header of the page:
>
> src="/
The real problem is not the missing fonts, but the fact that sage
doesn't include the jsMath image fonts that are supposed to be used
when the jsMath TeX fonts aren't available. I'm sure this was not
included because it was considered to be too large a component, but it
really should be, as it wo
> You've convinced me. We'll make an optional spkg that people can
> install on servers to enable this functionality:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1971
OK, great. I think that will be useful.
In another thread someone mentioned the STIX fonts, and I said I hoped
to support
> What is the current status of your sprite fonts plugin? That seems like
> that would address the size issues.
It was a nice idea, but turned out to have some serious drawbacks. It
really slowed down IE (it appears that IE renders the entire image
behind the scenes even though only a tiny port
> > my comment that the warning about
> > printing should be on the screen rather than the paper still holds.
>
> I agree with that. When one clicks the print button in the notebook it should
> render the html withjsmathbut with no warning at all. I've made this
> trac #1950:
>
> http://trac
> Davide, see my earlier message to William.
> Apologies for my confusion. There's a lot of stuff for my poor aged
> brain to absorb and I hadn't read your web pages properly... :-)
No problem. A lot of people have made the same mistakes. It can be
confusing when there are several different t
> The fonts I downloaded are 80Mb!
You downloaded the wrong thing. There are two kinds of fonts used by
jsMath: one is standard TTF fonts that the browser can use like any
other font. These are called the "jsMath TeX fonts", and are what the
warning message is complaining about. The link on t
> (2) Any typesetting in the notebook basically looks like crap without the
> jsmath
> fonts, so it would be bad to encourage people to completely remove the warning
> message.
I agree completely. That is why the message is there in the first
place. Removing it removes any chance of the user f
> I agree about the warning. It might be better as a browser alert, or
> maybe an embedded popup.
The "hide" button already makes the message essentially a popup, but
one that you can ignore if you want. Making it an alert or real popup
would REQUIRE user interaction (whereas you can simply igno
> I find the warning messages that appear at the top of the notebook saying
> that JsMath isn't available annoying.
If you look carefully, it says the jsMath TeX fonts aren't found, not
that jsMath isn't found (in fact, it is jsMath that issuing the
message, so clearly that was found).
> I find
> Thanks for posting! Are you the author of jsmath?
Yes, I am he.
> Anyway, I meant that there isn't an easy way currently in Sage.
> Certainly jsmath itself offers this option.
Sorry, I didn't write carefully enough. I meant to say jsMath has the
ability (not sage), and that it could be adde
18 matches
Mail list logo
