On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:43 AM Henri Girard wrote:
>
> I am looking for the error, as I am on ubuntu 9.5 deb maybe it's not exactly
> like debian ?
>
> I got a problem to find local I got .local ?
>
>
> ./sage -tp --optional=debian,pip,sage,sage_spkg,mathematica
> src/sage/interfaces/mathematic
|I am looking for the error, as I am on ubuntu 9.5 deb maybe it's not
exactly like debian ?|
|I got a problem to find local I got .local ?|
|
|
|./sage -tp --optional=debian,pip,sage,sage_spkg,mathematica
src/sage/interfaces/mathematica.py|
|= test session starts
Please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33395
- we should document this, still.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:08 AM Henri Girard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I use mathematica engine with vscode on ubuntu22.04 after few tunings
> it's working but I can't get it working on sagemath, in fact I don't
> know h
Hi,
I use mathematica engine with vscode on ubuntu22.04 after few tunings
it's working but I can't get it working on sagemath, in fact I don't
know how to do it !
Any body can help me with sage ?
best
Henri
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage
I am working on our department servers so I don't have root access. I have
aliased the math command to call mathematica. When I use the Mathematica
interface (Sage version 6.3), it tries to use a temp file because at some
point, allow_use_file is set to True. Is there anyway to call mathemati
On 31 December 2012 17:09, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> > On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has
>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> > On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
> >> Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has
> >> changed.
> >
> > Of course, the Mathematica interface cannot be
On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has
>> changed.
>
> Of course, the Mathematica interface cannot be tested as often as everything
> else because not everyone has a lic
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 7:09 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 29 December 2012 02:39, William Stein wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
> >> > also make it an optional sage package).
> >>
> >> This is
On 29 December 2012 02:39, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
>> > also make it an optional sage package).
>>
>> This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking
>> WRI exact
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
> > also make it an optional sage package).
>
> This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking
> WRI exactly where we stood if using their protocol.
>
> At the end of the
On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
> also make it an optional sage package).
This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking
WRI exactly where we stood if using their protocol.
At the end of the day, anything you do to circumvent using their
shared library, WRI
On 28 December 2012 16:41, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote:
>>
>> I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica
>> written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to
>> writting such an interface. I wou
Of course #13540 will on most machines enable internet-using tests. So
somebody needs to fix the finance / stock price interfaces that currently
fail their doctests *hint* *hint* ;-)
On Friday, December 28, 2012 5:55:48 PM UTC, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> Of course, the Mathematica interface canno
On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
>> Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something
>> seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with "the rest of
>> the world".
>>
>> Setup(s) :
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I'm leaning towards a BSD-licensed C library with a RPC mechanism (tcp/ip
> socket or named pipe). That would be pretty minimal and you don't have to
> worry about Python stuff when linking on the proprietary side.
Yes, that makes a *lot* o
I'm leaning towards a BSD-licensed C library with a RPC mechanism (tcp/ip
socket or named pipe). That would be pretty minimal and you don't have to
worry about Python stuff when linking on the proprietary side.
On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:47:46 PM UTC, William wrote:
>
>1. Write a stand
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote:
>
>> I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to
>> Mathematica written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got
>> around to writting such an interface.
On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote:
> I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica
> written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to
> writting such an interface. I would like to strongly encourage people to
> write one.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
> > Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica :
> something
> > seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with "the rest
> of
> > the world".
> >
> >
On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something
> seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with "the rest of
> the world".
>
> Setup(s) : Debian wheezy with self-compiled sage v 5.4.1 then v 5.5,
>
Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something
seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with "the rest of
the world".
Setup(s) : Debian wheezy with self-compiled sage v 5.4.1 then v 5.5,
Mathematica Linux 64 bits V8 then V9.
(1) sage v 5.4 <--> Mathem
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 at 11:47AM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Mathematica is touring South Africa.
> http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/
> I expect their presentation to be very professional.
>
> Reviving an old topic since Mathematica is visiting our Free Software
> supporting institute
On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
* the price of the software
http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/
$139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey
how astronomical that amount to almost all African
students. Worse, when they want to start a small
business after completin
Hi Jan,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Does anyone have anything to add,
Here's a section from the Sage FAQ that raises some ethical issues in
mathematics research:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/faq/faq-general.html#why-is-sage-free-open-source
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguye
Hi
Mathematica is touring South Africa.
http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/
I expect their presentation to be very professional.
Reviving an old topic since Mathematica is visiting our Free Software supporting
institute www.aims.ac.za on Monday. It happens to be the first day of a 3-we
I'm trying to duplicate what this Mathematica code does in SAGE:
F[z_]=4*Log[z^3]-2*Log[z^3-8]
a=ContourPlot[If[yFalse, Contours->30]
b=Plot[Sqrt[3]*x, {x, 0, 4}]
Show[a, b]
I originally used this (this doesn't include the sqrt(3)*x line in the
code above):
z = var('z')
f(z) = 4*log(z^3)-2*log(z
Hello,
I am attempting to get my SAGE environment to interact with
Mathematica 6.0 installed in /Applications on Mac OS 10.5.8. When I
attempt to evaluate a mathematica expression I get the following
error:
eqn = mathematica('3x + 15 == 3')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1,
Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that
only works if I have mathematica installed.
What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage?
We used to have mathematica at my school and I remember using some very
nice mathematica notebooks by Jerry Uh
Hi,
In IRC when nobody was looking, somebody asked:
04:54 < xxx> stupid question: the mathematica interface of sage will open
_many_ instances of mathematica. unfortunately
our institute has a network license for only 4
copies. is it possible to force SAGE to us
I am currently running Mathematica through wine on Ubuntu.
>From the command line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wine "C:\Program Files\Wolfram Research\Mathematica
\6.0\math.exe"
Mathematica 6.0 for Microsoft Windows (32-bit)
Copyright 1988-2008 Wolfram Research, Inc.
In[1]:=
And in /usr/bin/math
[EMAIL
I just received this in an email from Wolfram:
Dear Mathematica User,
Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service
subscriber, you will receive a download link enabling you to
immediately access your free upgrade. Even at this busy time, we
hope that you will make the time to take a
32 matches
Mail list logo
